The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Classification of brain tumor type and grade using MRI texture and shape in a machine learning scheme
Open accessAbstract
The objective of this study is to investigate the use of pattern classification methods for distinguishing different types of brain tumors, such as primary gliomas from metastases, and also for grading of gliomas. The availability of an automated computer analysis tool that is more objective than human readers can potentially lead to more reliable and reproducible brain tumor diagnostic procedures. A computer‐assisted classification method combining conventional MRI and perfusion MRI is developed and used for differential diagnosis. The proposed scheme consists of several steps including region‐of‐interest definition, feature extraction, feature selection, and classification. The extracted features include tumor shape and intensity characteristics, as well as rotation invariant texture features. Feature subset selection is performed using support vector machines with recursive feature elimination. The method was applied on a population of 102 brain tumors histologically diagnosed as metastasis (24), meningiomas (4), gliomas World Health Organization grade II (22), gliomas World Health Organization grade III (18), and glioblastomas (34). The binary support vector machine classification accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, assessed by leave‐one‐out cross‐validation, were, respectively, 85%, 87%, and 79% for discrimination of metastases from gliomas and 88%, 85%, and 96% for discrimination of high‐grade (grades III and IV) from low‐grade (grade II) neoplasms. Multiclass classification was also performed via a one‐vs‐all voting scheme. Magn Reson Med, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Numerical recipes in C: the art of scientific computing
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-5638 · Cited by 17,933
Breiman, L. (1996) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00058655 · Cited by 16,325
Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL
Smith, S. M., Jenkinson, M., Woolrich, M. W., Beckmann, C. F., Behrens, T. E. J., Johansen-Berg, H., Bannister, P. R., De Luca, M., Drobnjak, I., Flitney, D. E., et al. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051 · Cited by 13,630
Numerical recipes in Pascal: the art of scientific computing
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-5158 · Cited by 11,811
Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines
Guyon, I., Weston, J., Barnhill, S., & Vapnik, V. (2002) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1012487302797 · Cited by 9,954
A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images
Jenkinson, M., & Smith, S. (2001) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/s1361-8415(01)00036-6 · Cited by 6,872
(2000) · CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs · doi:10.1162/153244303322753616 · Cited by 3,502
Daugman, J. G. (1985) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.2.001160 · Cited by 3,219
Lacroix, M., Abi-Said, D., Fourney, D. R., Gokaslan, Z. L., Shi, W., DeMonte, F., Lang, F. F., McCutcheon, I. E., Hassenbusch, S. J., Holland, E., et al. (2001) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/jns.2001.95.2.0190 · Cited by 3,091
Nearest neighbor (NN) norms: NN pattern classification techniques
Dasarathy, B. V. (1991) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,654
Cited by
Swin UNETR: Swin Transformers for Semantic Segmentation of Brain Tumors in MRI Images
Hatamizadeh, A., Nath, V., Tang, Y., Yang, D., Roth, H. R., & Xu, D. (2022) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-08999-2_22 · Cited by 2,273
A survey of MRI-based medical image analysis for brain tumor studies
Bauer, S., Wiest, R., Nolte, L.-P., & Reyes, M. (2013) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/58/13/r97 · Cited by 1,036
Multi-grade brain tumor classification using deep CNN with extensive data augmentation
Sajjad, M., Khan, S., Muhammad, K., Wu, W., Ullah, A., & Baik, S. W. (2019) · Journal of Computational Science · doi:10.1016/j.jocs.2018.12.003 · Cited by 891
Assessment of tumor heterogeneity: an emerging imaging tool for clinical practice?
Davnall, F., Yip, C. S. P., Ljungqvist, G., Selmi, M., Ng, F., Sanghera, B., Ganeshan, B., Miles, K. A., Cook, G. J., & Goh, V. (2012) · Insights into Imaging · doi:10.1007/s13244-012-0196-6 · Cited by 878
Multi-Classification of Brain Tumor Images Using Deep Neural Network
Sultan, H. H., Salem, N. M., & Al-Atabany, W. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2919122 · Cited by 775
Metadata
- Authors
- Zacharaki, E. I., Wang, S., Chawla, S., Soo Yoo, D., Wolf, R., Melhem, E. R., & Davatzikos, C.
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-10-26
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1609-1618
- ISSN
- 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2594
- OpenAlex
- W2116531017
- Cited by
- 855
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 6.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Classification of brain tumor type and grade using MRI texture and shape in a machine learning scheme. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mrm.22147
- The paper
- Zacharaki, E. I., Wang, S., Chawla, S., Soo Yoo, D., Wolf, R., Melhem, E. R., & Davatzikos, C. (2009). Classification of brain tumor type and grade using MRI texture and shape in a machine learning scheme. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.22147
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.