Cited by 878Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingImage Retrieval and Classification TechniquesAI in cancer detection

Assessment of tumor heterogeneity: an emerging imaging tool for clinical practice?

Open access
Davnall, Fergus, Yip, Connie S. P., Ljungqvist, Gunnar, Selmi, Mariyah, Ng, Francesca, Sanghera, Bal, Ganeshan, Balaji, Miles, Kenneth A. +2 more·2012·Insights into Imaging

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tumor spatial heterogeneity is an important prognostic factor, which may be reflected in medical images METHODS: Image texture analysis is an approach of quantifying heterogeneity that may not be appreciated by the naked eye. Different methods can be applied including statistical-, model-, and transform-based methods. RESULTS: Early evidence suggests that texture analysis has the potential to augment diagnosis and characterization as well as improve tumor staging and therapy response assessment in oncological practice. CONCLUSION: This review provides an overview of the application of texture analysis with different imaging modalities, CT, MRI, and PET, to date and describes the technical challenges that have limited its widespread clinical implementation so far. With further efforts to refine its application, image texture analysis has the potential to develop into a valuable clinical tool for oncologic imaging. TEACHING POINTS : • Tumor spatial heterogeneity is an important prognostic factor. • Image texture analysis is an approach of quantifying heterogeneity. • Different methods can be applied, including statistical-, model-, and transform-based methods. • Texture analysis could improve the diagnosis, tumor staging, and therapy response assessment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13244-012-0196-6

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the past 10 years, radiomics and radiogenomics research in tomographic imaging has increased dramatically.

    “In the past 10 years, radiomics and radiogenomics research in tomographic imaging (CT, MR imaging, and PET) has increased dramatically.”

    From Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data (2016) · cites this paper as [42]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davnall, F., Yip, C. S. P., Ljungqvist, G., Selmi, M., Ng, F., Sanghera, B., Ganeshan, B., Miles, K. A., Cook, G. J., & Goh, V.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Mount Vernon Hospital (GB)
  • Brighton and Sussex Medical School (GB)
  • St Thomas' Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Goh, Vicky
Venue
Insights into Imaging
Published
2012-10-24
Volume
3
Issue
6
Pages
573-589
ISSN
1869-4101 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052295501
Cited by
878
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 86 · 2021: 105 · 2020: 98 · 2019: 92 · 2018: 91 · 2017: 75 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 9
FWCI
16.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Insights into Imaging (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  • King's College London
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
Keywords
tumor heterogeneity, texture analysis, spatial heterogeneity, CT, magnetic resonance imaging, PET, tumor staging, therapy response assessment, prognostic factors, tumor imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review