The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sodium MRI using a density‐adapted 3D radial acquisition technique
Open accessAbstract
A density‐adapted three‐dimensional radial projection reconstruction pulse sequence is presented which provides a more efficient k‐space sampling than conventional three‐dimensional projection reconstruction sequences. The gradients of the density‐adapted three‐dimensional radial projection reconstruction pulse sequence are designed such that the averaged sampling density in each spherical shell of k‐space is constant. Due to hardware restrictions, an inner sphere of k‐space is sampled without density adaption. This approach benefits from both the straightforward handling of conventional three‐dimensional projection reconstruction sequence trajectories and an enhanced signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) efficiency akin to the commonly used three‐dimensional twisted projection imaging trajectories. Benefits for low SNR applications, when compared to conventional three‐dimensional projection reconstruction sequences, are demonstrated with the example of sodium imaging. In simulations of the point‐spread function, the SNR of small objects is increased by a factor 1.66 for the density‐adapted three‐dimensional radial projection reconstruction pulse sequence sequence. Using analytical and experimental phantoms, it is shown that the density‐adapted three‐dimensional radial projection reconstruction pulse sequence allows higher resolutions and is more robust in the presence of field inhomogeneities. High‐quality in vivo images of the healthy human leg muscle and the healthy human brain are acquired. For equivalent scan times, the SNR is up to a factor of 1.8 higher and anatomic details are better resolved using density‐adapted three‐dimensional radial projection reconstruction pulse sequence. Magn Reson Med, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pros and cons of ultra-high-field MRI/MRS for human application
Ladd, M. E., Bachert, P., Meyerspeer, M., Moser, E., Nagel, A. M., Norris, D. G., Schmitter, S., Speck, O., Straub, S., & Zaiss, M. (2018) · Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy · doi:10.1016/j.pnmrs.2018.06.001 · Cited by 544
Self-citationOptimized 3D ultrashort echo time pulmonary MRI
Johnson, K. M., Fain, S. B., Schiebler, M. L., & Nagle, S. (2013) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.24570 · Cited by 322
Hammon, M., Grossmann, S., Linz, P., Kopp, C., Dahlmann, A., Garlichs, C., Janka, R., Cavallaro, A., Luft, F. C., Uder, M., et al. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0141336 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- Nagel, A. M., Laun, F. B., Weber, M., Matthies, C., Semmler, W., & Schad, L. R.
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-10-26
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1565-1573
- ISSN
- 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2594
- OpenAlex
- W2012104505
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sodium MRI using a density‐adapted 3D radial acquisition technique. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mrm.22157
- The paper
- Nagel, A. M., Laun, F. B., Weber, M., Matthies, C., Semmler, W., & Schad, L. R. (2009). Sodium MRI using a density‐adapted 3D radial acquisition technique. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.22157
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.