The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Estimation of labeling efficiency in pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling: Estimation of Labeling Efficiency in pCASL
Open accessAbstract
Pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling MRI is a new arterial spin labeling technique that has the potential of combining advantages of continuous arterial spin labeling and pulsed arterial spin labeling. However, unlike continuous arterial spin labeling, the labeling process of pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling is not strictly an adiabatic inversion and the efficiency of labeling may be subject specific. Here, three experiments were performed to study the labeling efficiency in pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling MRI. First, the optimal labeling position was determined empirically to be approximately 84 mm below the anterior commissure-posterior commissure line in order to achieve the highest sensitivity. Second, an experimental method was developed to utilize phase-contrast velocity MRI as a normalization factor and to estimate the labeling efficiency in vivo, which was founded to be 0.86 +/- 0.06 (n = 10, mean +/- standard deviation). Third, we compared the labeling efficiency of pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling MRI under normocapnic and hypercapnic (inhalation of 5% CO(2)) conditions and showed that a higher flow velocity in the feeding arteries resulted in a reduction in the labeling efficiency. In summary, our results suggest that labeling efficiency is a critical parameter in pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling MRI not only in terms of achieving highest sensitivity but also in quantification of absolute cerebral blood flow in milliliters per minute per 100 g. We propose that the labeling efficiency should be estimated using phase-contrast velocity MRI on a subject-specific basis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hart, J., Kraut, M. A., Womack, K. B., Strain, J., Didehbani, N., Bartz, E., Conover, H., Mansinghani, S., Lu, H., & Cullum, C. M. (2013) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/2013.jamaneurol.340 · Cited by 315
Self-citationAmygdala Hyperactivity at Rest in Paranoid Individuals With Schizophrenia
Pinkham, A. E., Liu, P., Lu, H., Kriegsman, M., Simpson, C., & Tamminga, C. (2015) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.14081000 · Cited by 93
Self-citationLiang, X., Connelly, A., & Calamante, F. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.013 · Cited by 48
Risk factor analysis of cerebral white matter hyperintensities in children with sickle cell disease
van der Land, V., Mutsaerts, H. J. M. M., Engelen, M., Heijboer, H., Roest, M., Hollestelle, M. J., Kuijpers, T. W., Nederkoorn, P. J., Cnossen, M. H., Majoie, C. B. L. M., et al. (2016) · British Journal of Haematology · doi:10.1111/bjh.13819 · Cited by 30
Inducing Paranoia is Linked to Increased Resting Amygdala Cerebral Blood Flow in Healthy Individuals
Pinkham, A., Bass, E., Klein, H., Springfield, C., Kent, J., & Aslan, S. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Psychopathology · doi:10.1177/20438087221130693 · Cited by 8
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Aslan, S., Xu, F., Wang, P. L., Uh, J., Yezhuvath, U. S., van Osch, M., & Lu, H.
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-02-25
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 765-771
- ISSN
- 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2012602334
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimation of labeling efficiency in pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling: Estimation of Labeling Efficiency in pCASL. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mrm.22245
- The paper
- Aslan, S., Xu, F., Wang, P. L., Uh, J., Yezhuvath, U. S., van Osch, M., & Lu, H. (2010). Estimation of labeling efficiency in pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling: Estimation of Labeling Efficiency in pCASL. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.22245
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.