The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Low-rank plus sparse matrix decomposition for accelerated dynamic MRI with separation of background and dynamic components: L+S Reconstruction
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: To apply the low-rank plus sparse (L+S) matrix decomposition model to reconstruct undersampled dynamic MRI as a superposition of background and dynamic components in various problems of clinical interest. THEORY AND METHODS: The L+S model is natural to represent dynamic MRI data. Incoherence between k-t space (acquisition) and the singular vectors of L and the sparse domain of S is required to reconstruct undersampled data. Incoherence between L and S is required for robust separation of background and dynamic components. Multicoil L+S reconstruction is formulated using a convex optimization approach, where the nuclear norm is used to enforce low rank in L and the l1 norm is used to enforce sparsity in S. Feasibility of the L+S reconstruction was tested in several dynamic MRI experiments with true acceleration, including cardiac perfusion, cardiac cine, time-resolved angiography, and abdominal and breast perfusion using Cartesian and radial sampling. RESULTS: The L+S model increased compressibility of dynamic MRI data and thus enabled high-acceleration factors. The inherent background separation improved background suppression performance compared to conventional data subtraction, which is sensitive to motion. CONCLUSION: The high acceleration and background separation enabled by L+S promises to enhance spatial and temporal resolution and to enable background suppression without the need of subtraction or modeling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity
Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2003.819861 · Cited by 57,892
A Fast Iterative Shrinkage-Thresholding Algorithm for Linear Inverse Problems
Beck, A., & Teboulle, M. (2009) · SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences · doi:10.1137/080716542 · Cited by 11,952
Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging
Lustig, M., Donoho, D., & Pauly, J. M. (2007) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.21391 · Cited by 6,952
Cited by
A deep cascade of convolutional neural networks for dynamic MR image reconstruction
Schlemper, J., Caballero, J., Hajnal, J. V., Price, A. N., & Rueckert, D. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2017.2760978 · Cited by 1,338
Demene, C., Deffieux, T., Pernot, M., Osmanski, B.-F., Biran, V., Gennisson, J.-L., Sieu, L.-A., Bergel, A., Franqui, S., Correas, J.-M., et al. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2015.2428634 · Cited by 983
Eo, T., Jun, Y., Kim, T., Jang, J., Lee, H., & Hwang, D. (2018) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.27201 · Cited by 455
Baranger, J., Arnal, B., Perren, F., Baud, O., Tanter, M., & Demene, C. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2018.2789499 · Cited by 348
Deep learning in ultrasound imaging
van Sloun, R. J. G., Cohen, R., & Eldar, Y. C. (2020) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2019.2932116 · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Otazo, R., Candès, E., & Sodickson, D. K.
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-04-23
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1125-1136
- ISSN
- 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2168903001
- Cited by
- 697
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 35.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Low-rank plus sparse matrix decomposition for accelerated dynamic MRI with separation of background and dynamic components: L+S Reconstruction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mrm.25240
- The paper
- Otazo, R., Candès, E., & Sodickson, D. K. (2015). Low-rank plus sparse matrix decomposition for accelerated dynamic MRI with separation of background and dynamic components: L+S Reconstruction. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.25240
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.