Cited by 135Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsMedical Imaging and Analysis

Automatic segmentation of the right ventricle from cardiac MRI using a learning‐based approach

Open access
Avendi, Michael R., Kheradvar, Arash, Jafarkhani, Hamid·2017·Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to accurately segment the right ventricle (RV) from cardiac MRI using a fully automatic learning‐based method. Methods: The proposed method uses deep learning algorithms, i.e., convolutional neural networks and stacked autoencoders, for automatic detection and initial segmentation of the RV chamber. The initial segmentation is then combined with the deformable models to improve the accuracy and robustness of the process. We trained our algorithm using 16 cardiac MRI datasets of the MICCAI 2012 RV Segmentation Challenge database and validated our technique using the rest of the dataset (32 subjects). Results: An average Dice metric of 82.5% along with an average Hausdorff distance of 7.85 mm were achieved for all the studied subjects. Furthermore, a high correlation and level of agreement with the ground truth contours for end‐diastolic volume (0.98), end‐systolic volume (0.99), and ejection fraction (0.93) were observed. Conclusion: Our results show that deep learning algorithms can be effectively used for automatic segmentation of the RV. Computed quantitative metrics of our method outperformed that of the existing techniques participated in the MICCAI 2012 challenge, as reported by the challenge organizers. Magn Reson Med 78:2439–2448, 2017. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mrm.26631

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Avendi, M. R., Kheradvar, A., & Jafarkhani, H.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Jafarkhani, Hamid
Venue
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-02-16
Volume
78
Issue
6
Pages
2439-2448
ISSN
  • 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2594
OpenAlex
W2588773529
Cited by
135
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 2
FWCI
7.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
American Heart Association (14GRNT18800013)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Medical Imaging and Analysis
Keywords
right ventricle segmentation, cardiac MRI, automatic segmentation, convolutional neural networks, stacked autoencoder, deformable models, end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, ejection fraction
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Algorithms, Automation, Heart, Heart Ventricles, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Reproducibility of Results, Models, Statistical, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review