Cited by 18Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research

Acceptance and commitment therapy for people with rheumatic disease: existing evidence and future directions

Hegarty, Roisin S.M., Fletcher, Benjamin D., Conner, Tamlin S., Stebbings, Simon, Treharne, Gareth J.·2020·Musculoskeletal Care

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Despite advances in the management of rheumatic diseases, many patients experience persistent pain and fatigue. Psychological interventions are useful adjunctive treatments, but improvements tend to be small, and progress in this area is needed. The aim of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for the treatment of chronic pain and fatigue in patients with rheumatic disease. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of ACT for the treatment of chronic pain and fatigue in patients with rheumatic disease. Ten RCTs that included people with rheumatic disease were identified, rated for risk of bias, and summarised in terms of effects on relevant outcomes (disability, emotional functioning, pain, and quality of life). RESULTS: Treatment with ACT was associated with improvements in physical and emotional functioning, pain, and quality of life in chronic pain patients. The favourable effects of ACT were evident when compared with those of treatment as usual or active control conditions (e.g., pain education and novel medication). There was consistent evidence to show that ACT is beneficial in improving physical and emotional functioning in patients with fibromyalgia but a lack of evidence pertaining to patients with other forms of rheumatic disease. CONCLUSION: ACT provides benefit for fibromyalgia patients. Further high-quality research is needed to develop ACT interventions for people with inflammatory rheumatic diseases and to evaluate their effectiveness for managing the pain and fatigue associated with these conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/msc.1464

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 58 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hegarty, R. S. M., Fletcher, B. D., Conner, T. S., Stebbings, S., & Treharne, G. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Otago (NZ)
  • Department of Psychology University of Otago Dunedin New Zealand
Corresponding author
Hegarty, Roisin S.M.
Venue
Musculoskeletal Care
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-04-15
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
330-341
ISSN
  • 1478-2189 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-0681
OpenAlex
W3015580419
Cited by
18
References
58
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Musculoskeletal Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Jack Thompson Arthritis Fund (JT364)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, rheumatic diseases, chronic pain, fatigue, fibromyalgia, psychological intervention, quality of life, emotional functioning, disability, inflammatory rheumatic diseases
MeSH terms
Fatigue, Fibromyalgia, Humans, Quality of Life, Chronic Pain, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review