The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of potentiated and unpotentiated twitches as an index of muscle fatigue
Abstract
Recent data suggest that the potentiated twitch is a more sensitive index of contractile fatigue than is the unpotentiated twitch. We hypothesized that after a potentially fatiguing load, the fall in twitch amplitude of the potentiated twitch would be significantly greater than that of an unpotentiated twitch. We compared the response of the potentiated and unpotentiated twitches to a series of potentially fatiguing loads using magnetic stimulation of the femoral nerve in 10 healthy subjects. The baseline unpotentiated quadriceps twitch force (TwQu), potentiated quadriceps twitch force (TwQp), and maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) were 129 ± 6 N, 198 ± 6 N, and 622 ± 25 N, respectively. During a fatigue protocol that was designed to induce a spectrum of fatigue from mild to marked, the percent fall in quadriceps twitch force was significantly greater for the potentiated method than for the unpotentiated method at all levels of fatigue (P < .005). The within‐subject within‐day coefficient of variation was 7.5 ± 0.5% for TwQu and 5.6 ± 0.9% for TwQp. Thus, TwQp is reproducible and is superior to TwQu for detecting early muscle fatigue. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Muscle Nerve 25: 000–000, 2002
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965
Cellular mechanisms of muscle fatigue
Fitts, R. H. (1994) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1994.74.1.49 · Cited by 1,537 · cited 1×
“The mechanism for excitation-contraction coupling impairment has not been fully elucidated and may involve a complex interaction of multiple factors.(7) Putative mechanisms for potentiation are alterations in calcium kinetics and phosphorylation of the light chains on the myosin head.”
Background
Cited by
Skeletal muscle dysfunction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Jeffery Mador, M., & Bozkanat, E. (2001) · Respiratory Research · doi:10.1186/rr60 · Cited by 425
Amann, M., Proctor, L. T., Sebranek, J. J., Pegelow, D. F., & Dempsey, J. A. (2009) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2008.163303 · Cited by 393
Amann, M., Eldridge, M. W., Lovering, A. T., Stickland, M. K., Pegelow, D. F., & Dempsey, J. A. (2006) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2006.113936 · Cited by 390
Amann, M., Blain, G. M., Proctor, L. T., Sebranek, J. J., Pegelow, D. F., & Dempsey, J. A. (2011) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2011.213769 · Cited by 286
Effect of inspiratory muscle work on peripheral fatigue of locomotor muscles in healthy humans
Romer, L. M., Lovering, A. T., Haverkamp, H. C., Pegelow, D. F., & Dempsey, J. A. (2006) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2005.099697 · Cited by 225
Metadata
- Authors
- Kufel, T. J., Pineda, L. A., & Mador, M. J.
- Venue
- Muscle & Nerve
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-02-19
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 438-444
- ISSN
- 0148-639X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4598
- OpenAlex
- W1991430841
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of potentiated and unpotentiated twitches as an index of muscle fatigue. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mus.10047
- The paper
- Kufel, T. J., Pineda, L. A., & Mador, M. J. (2002). Comparison of potentiated and unpotentiated twitches as an index of muscle fatigue. Muscle & Nerve. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.10047
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.