The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Persistent inward currents in motoneuron dendrites: Implications for motor output
Abstract
The dendrites of motoneurons are not, as once thought, passive conduits for synaptic inputs. Instead they have voltage‐dependent channels that provide the capacity to generate a very strong persistent inward current (PIC). The amplitude of the PIC is proportional to the level of neuromodulatory input from the brainstem, which is mediated primarily by the monoamines serotonin and norepinephrine. During normal motor behavior, monoaminergic drive is likely to be moderately strong and the dendritic PIC generates many of the characteristic features of motor unit firing patterns. Most of the PIC activates at or below recruitment threshold and thus motor unit firing patterns exhibit a linear increase just above recruitment. The dendritic PIC allows motor unit derecruitment to occur at a lower input level than recruitment, thus providing sustained tonic firing with little or no synaptic input, especially in low‐threshold units. However the dendritic PIC can be readily deactivated by synaptic inhibition. The overall amplification due to the dendritic PIC and other effects of monoamines on motoneurons greatly increases the input–output gain of the motor pool. Thus the brainstem neuromodulatory input provides a mechanism by which the excitability of motoneurons can be varied for different motor behaviors. This control system is lost in spinal cord injury but PICs nonetheless recover near‐normal amplitudes in the months following the initial injury. The relationship of these findings to the cause of the spasticity syndrome developing after spinal cord injury is discussed. Muscle Nerve, 2005
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Models of recruitment and rate coding organization in motor-unit pools.
Fuglevand, A. J., Winter, D. A., & Patla, A. E. (1993) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1993.70.6.2470 · Cited by 988
A neural circuit for circadian regulation of arousal
Aston-Jones, G., Chen, S., Zhu, Y., & Oshinsky, M. L. (2001) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/89522 · Cited by 632
Cited by
Heckman, C. J., & Enoka, R. M. (2012) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.c100087 · Cited by 414
Self-citationThe knowns and unknowns of neural adaptations to resistance training
Škarabot, J., Brownstein, C. G., Casolo, A., Del Vecchio, A., & Ansdell, P. (2021) · European Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00421-020-04567-3 · Cited by 183
Nonlinear Input-Output Functions of Motoneurons
Binder, M. D., Powers, R. K., & Heckman, C. J. (2020) · Physiology · doi:10.1152/physiol.00026.2019 · Cited by 136
Self-citationOya, T., Riek, S., & Cresswell, A. G. (2009) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2009.175695 · Cited by 136
Mechanical vibration does not systematically reduce the tremor in essential tremor patients
Lora-Millán, J. S., López-Blanco, R., Gallego, J. Á., Méndez-Guerrero, A., González de la Aleja, J., & Rocon, E. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-52988-8 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Heckman, C. J., Gorassini, M. A., & Bennett, D. J.
- Venue
- Muscle & Nerve
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-12-22
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 135-156
- ISSN
- 0148-639X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4598
- OpenAlex
- W2098118593
- Cited by
- 487
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Persistent inward currents in motoneuron dendrites: Implications for motor output. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mus.20261
- The paper
- Heckman, C. J., Gorassini, M. A., & Bennett, D. J. (2005). Persistent inward currents in motoneuron dendrites: Implications for motor output. Muscle & Nerve. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.20261
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.