Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,098

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Fourth international consultation on incontinence recommendations of the international scientific committee: Evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and fecal incontinence

Open access
Abrams, P., Andersson, K.E., Birder, L., Brubaker, L., Cardozo, L., Chapple, C., Cottenden, A., Davila, W., de Ridder, D., Dmochowski, R., Drake, M., DuBeau, C., Fry, C., Hanno, P., Smith, J. Hay, Herschorn, S., Hosker, G., Kelleher, C., Koelbl, H., Khoury, S., Madoff, R., Milsom, I., Moore, K., Newman, D., Nitti, V., Norton, C., Nygaard, I., Payne, C., Smith, A., Staskin, D., Tekgul, S., Thuroff, J., Tubaro, A., Vodusek, D., Wein, A., Wyndaele, J.J.·2010·Neurourology and Urodynamics

Abstract

The consultation agreed to use the current International Continence Society definitions (ICS) for lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD) including incontinence, except where stated.These definitions appeared in the journal Neurourology and Urodynamics (2002; 21:167-178 and 2006; 25: 293) or can be viewed on the ICS website: www.icsoffice.org.The following ICS definitions are relevant:Christopher Chapple led the review process.The 4th International Consultation on Incontinence met from July 5 to 9 2008 in Paris and was organized by the International Consultation on Urological Diseases, a non-governmental organization, in official collaboration with the World Health Organisation, in order to develop recommendations for the diagnosis evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse and bladder pain syndrome.The recommendations are evidence based following a thorough review of the available literature and the global subjective opinion of recognized experts serving on focused committees.The individual committee reports were developed and peer reviewed by open presentation and comment.The Scientific Committee, consisting of the Chairmen of all the committees then refined the final recommendations.These recommendations published in 2008 will be periodically re-evaluated in the light of clinical experience, technological progress and research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/nau.20870

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,098

Metadata

Authors
Abrams, P., Andersson, K. E., Birder, L., Brubaker, L., Cardozo, L., Chapple, C., Cottenden, A., Davila, W., de Ridder, D., Dmochowski, R., Drake, M., DuBeau, C., Fry, C., Hanno, P., Smith, J. H., Herschorn, S., Hosker, G., Kelleher, C., Koelbl, H., Khoury, S., Madoff, R., Milsom, I., Moore, K., Newman, D., Nitti, V., Norton, C., Nygaard, I., Payne, C., Smith, A., Staskin, D., Tekgul, S., Thuroff, J., Tubaro, A., Vodusek, D., Wein, A., & Wyndaele, J. J.
Venue
Neurourology and Urodynamics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-12-18
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
213-240
ISSN
  • 0733-2467 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6777
OpenAlex
W4253168713
Cited by
1,098
References
0
FWCI
30.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fourth international consultation on incontinence recommendations of the international scientific committee: Evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and fecal incontinence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/nau.20870
The paper
Abrams, P., Andersson, K. E., Birder, L., Brubaker, L., Cardozo, L., Chapple, C., Cottenden, A., Davila, W., de Ridder, D., Dmochowski, R., Drake, M., DuBeau, C., Fry, C., Hanno, P., Smith, J. H., Herschorn, S., Hosker, G., Kelleher, C., Koelbl, H., . . . Wyndaele, J. J. (2010). Fourth international consultation on incontinence recommendations of the international scientific committee: Evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and fecal incontinence. Neurourology and Urodynamics. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20870

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.