Cited by 33Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research

Cost‐effectiveness of involving nurse specialists for adult patients with urinary incontinence in primary care compared to care‐as‐usual: An economic evaluation alongside a pragmatic randomized controlled trial

Albers‐Heitner, C.P., Joore, M.A., Winkens, R.A.G., Lagro‐Janssen, A.L.M., Severens, J.L., Berghmans, L.C.M.·2012·Neurourology and Urodynamics

Abstract

Aims: To determine the 12‐month, societal cost‐effectiveness of involving urinary incontinence (UI) nurse specialists in primary care compared to care‐as‐usual by general practitioners (GPs). Methods: From 2005 until 2008 an economic evaluation was performed alongside a pragmatic multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing UI patients receiving care by nurse specialists with patients receiving care‐as‐usual by GPs in the Netherlands. One hundred eighty‐six adult patients with stress, urgency, or mixed UI were randomly allocated to the intervention and 198 to care‐as‐usual; they were followed for 1 year. Main outcome measures were Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY societal) based on societal preferences for health outcomes (EuroQol‐5D), QALY patient based on patient preferences for health outcomes (EuroQol VAS), and Incontinence Severity weighted Life Year (ISLY) based on patient‐reported severity and impact of UI (ICIQ‐UI SF). Health care resource use, patient and family costs, and productivity costs were assessed. Data were collected by three monthly questionnaires. Incremental cost‐effectiveness ratios were calculated. Uncertainty was assessed using bootstrap simulation, and the expected value of perfect information was calculated (EVPI). Results: Compared to care‐as‐usual, nurse specialist involvement costs € 16,742/QALY societal gained. Both QALY patient and ISLY yield slightly more favorable cost‐effectiveness results. At a threshold of € 40,000/QALY societal,the probability that the intervention is cost‐effective is 58%. The EVPI amounts to € 78 million. Conclusions: Based on these results, we recommend adopting the nurse specialist intervention in primary care, while conducting more research through careful monitoring of the effectiveness and costs of the intervention in routine practice. Neurourol. Urodynam. 31:526–534, 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/nau.21204

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Albers‐Heitner, C. P., Joore, M. A., Winkens, R. A. G., Lagro‐Janssen, A. L. M., Severens, J. L., & Berghmans, L. C. M.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Albers‐Heitner, C.P.
Venue
Neurourology and Urodynamics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-01-24
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
526-534
ISSN
  • 0733-2467 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6777
OpenAlex
W2132421306
Cited by
33
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurourology and Urodynamics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Keywords
urinary incontinence, specialist nurses, cost-effectiveness, primary care, general practitioners, stress urinary incontinence, urge urinary incontinence, mixed urinary incontinence, quality-adjusted life years, health care utilization, productivity costs, expected value of perfect information
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nurse Clinicians, Primary Health Care, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Urinary Incontinence, Treatment Outcome, Health Care Costs, Quality-Adjusted Life Years

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review