The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for the conservative and nonpharmacological management of female pelvic floor dysfunction
Open accessAbstract
Introduction and hypothesis There has been an increasing need for the terminology on the conservative management of female pelvic floor dysfunction to be collated in a clinically based consensus report. Methods This Report combines the input of members and elected nominees of the Standardization and Terminology Committees of two International Organizations, the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) and the International Continence Society (ICS), assisted at intervals by many external referees. An extensive process of nine rounds of internal and external review was developed to exhaustively examine each definition, with decision‐making by collective opinion (consensus). Before opening up for comments on the webpages of ICS and IUGA, five experts from physiotherapy, neurology, urology, urogynecology, and nursing were invited to comment on the paper. Results A Terminology Report on the conservative management of female pelvic floor dysfunction, encompassing over 200 separate definitions, has been developed. It is clinically based, with the most common symptoms, signs, assessments, diagnoses, and treatments defined. Clarity and ease of use have been key aims to make it interpretable by practitioners and trainees in all the different specialty groups involved in female pelvic floor dysfunction. Ongoing review is not only anticipated, but will be required to keep the document updated and as widely acceptable as possible. Conclusion A consensus‐based terminology report for the conservative management of female pelvic floor dysfunction has been produced, aimed at being a significant aid to clinical practice and a stimulus for research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925
Hawker, G. A., Mian, S., Kendzerska, T., & French, M. (2011) · Arthritis Care & Research · doi:10.1002/acr.20543 · Cited by 4,924
Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: a conceptual and empirical review
Baer, R. A. (2003) · Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice · doi:10.1093/clipsy.bpg015 · Cited by 4,577
Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: A conceptual and empirical review.
Baer, R. A. (2003) · Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice · doi:10.1093/clipsy/bpg015 · Cited by 4,576
Progression Models in Resistance Training for Healthy Adults
(2009) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e3181915670 · Cited by 4,332
Dworkin, R. H., Turk, D. C., Wyrwich, K. W., Beaton, D., Cleeland, C. S., Farrar, J. T., Haythornthwaite, J. A., Jensen, M. P., Kerns, R. D., Ader, D. N., et al. (2008) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2007.09.005 · Cited by 3,471 · cited 1×
“a) Numerical rating scale (NRS), from 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), with half-points marked [51, 52].”
BackgroundProgression Models in Resistance Training for Healthy Adults
(2002) · Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise · doi:10.1097/00005768-200202000-00027 · Cited by 2,979
What is Motivational Interviewing?
Rollnick, S., & Miller, W. R. (1995) · Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1017/s135246580001643x · Cited by 1,737
Doggweiler, R., Whitmore, K. E., Meijlink, J. M., Drake, M. J., Frawley, H., Nordling, J., Hanno, P., Fraser, M. O., Homma, Y., Garrido, G., et al. (2017) · Neurourology and Urodynamics · doi:10.1002/nau.23072 · Cited by 230
Self-citation
Cited by
Haylen, B. T., Maher, C. F., Barber, M. D., Camargo, S., Dandolu, V., Digesu, A., Goldman, H. B., Huser, M., Milani, A. L., Moran, P. A., et al. (2016) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/s00192-015-2932-1 · Cited by 461
Self-citationFrawley, H., Shelly, B., Morin, M., Bernard, S., Bø, K., Digesu, G. A., Dickinson, T., Goonewardene, S., McClurg, D., Rahnama'i, M. S., et al. (2021) · Neurourology and Urodynamics · doi:10.1002/nau.24658 · Cited by 246
Self-citationPhysiotherapy management of urinary incontinence in females
Bø, K. (2020) · Journal of Physiotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.jphys.2020.06.011 · Cited by 80
Al-Danakh, A., Safi, M., Alradhi, M., Almoiliqy, M., Chen, Q., Al-Nusaif, M., Yang, X., Al-Dherasi, A., Zhu, X., & Yang, D. (2022) · Parkinson's Disease · doi:10.1155/2022/2700227 · Cited by 37
Lowder, J. L., Bavendam, T. G., Berry, A., Brady, S. S., Fitzgerald, C. M., Fok, C. S., Goode, P. S., Lewis, C. E., Mueller, E. R., Newman, D. K., et al. (2019) · Neurourology and Urodynamics · doi:10.1002/nau.23985 · Cited by 30
Nyhus, M. Ø., Mathew, S., Salvesen, Ø., Salvesen, K. Å., Stafne, S., & Volløyhaug, I. (2020) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.22007 · Cited by 27
Giagio, S., Innocenti, T., Salvioli, S., Lami, A., Meriggiola, M. C., Pillastrini, P., & Gava, G. (2021) · Neurourology and Urodynamics · doi:10.1002/nau.24712 · Cited by 19
Pelvic floor muscle weakness: a risk factor for anterior vaginal wall prolapse recurrence
Schachar, J. S., Devakumar, H., Martin, L., Farag, S., Hurtado, E. A., & Davila, G. W. (2018) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/s00192-018-3626-2 · Cited by 9
Mathew, S., Nyhus, M. Ø., Salvesen, Ø., Salvesen, K. Å., Stafne, S. N., & Volløyhaug, I. (2021) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/s00192-021-04684-3 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Bo, K., Frawley, H. C., Haylen, B. T., Abramov, Y., Almeida, F. G., Berghmans, B., Bortolini, M., Dumoulin, C., Gomes, M., McClurg, D., Meijlink, J., Shelly, E., Trabuco, E., Walker, C., & Wells, A.
- Venue
- Neurourology and Urodynamics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-12-05
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 221-244
- ISSN
- 0733-2467 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6777
- OpenAlex
- W2560234099
- Cited by
- 415
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 24.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
