Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 334

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Minimum Reporting Standards for in vivo Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRSinMRS): Experts' consensus recommendations

Open access
Lin, Alexander, Andronesi, Ovidiu, Bogner, Wolfgang, Choi, In‐Young, Coello, Eduardo, Cudalbu, Cristina, Juchem, Christoph, Kemp, Graham J., Kreis, Roland, Krššák, Martin, Lee, Phil, Maudsley, Andrew A., Meyerspeer, Martin, Mlynarik, Vladamir, Near, Jamie, Öz, Gülin, Peek, Aimie L., Puts, Nicolaas A., Ratai, Eva‐Maria, Tkáč, Ivan, Mullins, Paul G., Experts' Working Group on Reporting Standards for MR Spectroscopy·2021·NMR in Biomedicine

Abstract

The translation of MRS to clinical practice has been impeded by the lack of technical standardization. There are multiple methods of acquisition, post‐processing, and analysis whose details greatly impact the interpretation of the results. These details are often not fully reported, making it difficult to assess MRS studies on a standardized basis. This hampers the reviewing of manuscripts, limits the reproducibility of study results, and complicates meta‐analysis of the literature. In this paper a consensus group of MRS experts provides minimum guidelines for the reporting of MRS methods and results, including the standardized description of MRS hardware, data acquisition, analysis, and quality assessment. This consensus statement describes each of these requirements in detail and includes a checklist to assist authors and journal reviewers and to provide a practical way for journal editors to ensure that MRS studies are reported in full.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/nbm.4484

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Metadata

Authors
Lin, A., Andronesi, O., Bogner, W., Choi, I., Coello, E., Cudalbu, C., Juchem, C., Kemp, G. J., Kreis, R., Krššák, M., Lee, P., Maudsley, A. A., Meyerspeer, M., Mlynarik, V., Near, J., Öz, G., Peek, A. L., Puts, N. A., Ratai, E., Tkáč, I., Mullins, P. G., & Experts' Working Group on Reporting Standards for MR Spectroscopy
Venue
NMR in Biomedicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-02-09
Volume
34
Issue
5
Pages
e4484-e4484
ISSN
  • 0952-3480 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1492
OpenAlex
W3128512883
Cited by
334
References
34
FWCI
23.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Minimum Reporting Standards for in vivo Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRSinMRS): Experts' consensus recommendations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/nbm.4484
The paper
Lin, A., Andronesi, O., Bogner, W., Choi, I., Coello, E., Cudalbu, C., Juchem, C., Kemp, G. J., Kreis, R., Krššák, M., Lee, P., Maudsley, A. A., Meyerspeer, M., Mlynarik, V., Near, J., Öz, G., Peek, A. L., Puts, N. A., Ratai, E., . . . Experts' Working Group on Reporting Standards for MR Spectroscopy. (2021). Minimum Reporting Standards for in vivo Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRSinMRS): Experts' consensus recommendations. NMR in Biomedicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.4484

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.