Cited by 57Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyNutrition and Health in AgingDietetics, Nutrition, and Education

Role of the nutrition‐focused physical examination in identifying malnutrition and its effectiveness

Hummell, A. Christine, Cummings, Michael·2022·Nutrition in Clinical Practice

Abstract

It has long been recognized that malnutrition changes physical appearance, as evidenced by muscle wasting, losses of fat stores, signs of vitamin and mineral deficiencies, and reduced physical activity. Malnutrition is associated with poor clinical outcomes and quality of life. Various nutrition assessment parameters have been used to determine the presence and degree of malnutrition, including use of anthropometric measurements and laboratory values. In the mid-1980s, the Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) tool was developed in acknowledgement of the physical features of malnutrition; an evaluation of muscle mass, fat stores, edema, and functional capacity was a major component of the SGA. SGA became a gold standard for nutrition assessment. Since then, nutrition assessment evolved from anthropometric tools and laboratory values to one based on the nutrition-focused physical examination (NFPE). NFPE uses a head-to-toe approach to evaluate muscle mass, fat stores, fluid retention, micronutrient deficiencies, and functional capacity. In 2012, the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics and the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (AND/ASPEN) developed a standardized definition for malnutrition diagnoses for coding and reimbursement; the AND/ASPEN malnutrition diagnosis is derived from the SGA. A few studies demonstrated good agreement between SGA and AND/ASPEN malnutrition criteria in diagnosing malnutrition, and some studies have shown malnutrition, as diagnosed b…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ncp.10797

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Systematic identification of clinical signs related to nutrition provides essential information about an individual's nutritional status and may reveal deficiencies or excesses of specific nutrients.

    “In addition to dietary and anthropometric assessments, the systematic identification of clinical signs related to nutrition provides essential information about an individual's nutritional status and may reveal deficiencies or excesses of specific nutrients [28].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hummell, A. C., & Cummings, M.
Affiliations
Cleveland Clinic (US)
Venue
Nutrition in Clinical Practice
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-11-09
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
41-49
ISSN
  • 0884-5336 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-2452
OpenAlex
W3212163990
Cited by
57
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6
FWCI
0.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nutrition in Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education
Keywords
nutrition-focused physical examination, malnutrition, Subjective Global Assessment, malnutrition diagnosis, muscle atrophy, fat stores, micronutrient deficiency, functional capacity, clinical outcomes, nutritional assessment
MeSH terms
Anthropometry, Humans, Nutritional Status, Quality of Life, Nutrition Assessment, Malnutrition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review