Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 399

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficient algorithms for inferring evolutionary trees

Gusfield, Dan·1991·Networks

Abstract

In this paper, we examine two related problems of inferring the evolutionary history of n objects, either from present characters of the objects or from several partial estimates of their evolutionary history. The first problem is called the Phylogeny problem, and second is the Tree Compatibility problem. Both of these problems are central in algorithmic approaches to the study of evolution and in other problems of historical reconstruction. In this paper, we show that both of these problems can be solved by graph theoretic methods in linear time, which is time optimal, and which is a significant improvement over existing methods.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/net.3230210104

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 399

Metadata

Authors
Gusfield, D.
Venue
Networks
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1991-01
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
19-28
ISSN
  • 0028-3045 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0037
OpenAlex
W2074507113
Cited by
399
References
1
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficient algorithms for inferring evolutionary trees. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/net.3230210104
The paper
Gusfield, D. (1991). Efficient algorithms for inferring evolutionary trees. Networks. https://doi.org/10.1002/net.3230210104

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.