Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 306

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A phase field model of dynamic fracture: Robust field updates for the analysis of complex crack patterns

Hofacker, M., Miehe, C.·2013·International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering

Abstract

SUMMARY: The numerical modeling of dynamic failure mechanisms in solids due to fracture based on sharp crack discontinuities suffers in situations with complex crack topologies and demands the formulation of additional branching criteria. This drawback can be overcome by a diffusive crack modeling, which is based on the introduction of a crack phase field. Following our recent works on quasi‐static modeling of phase‐field‐type brittle fracture, we propose in this paper a computational framework for diffusive fracture for dynamic problems that allows the simulation of complex evolving crack topologies. It is based on the introduction of a local history field that contains a maximum reference energy obtained in the deformation history, which may be considered as a measure of the maximum tensile strain in the history. This local variable drives the evolution of the crack phase field. Its introduction provides a very transparent representation of the balance equation that governs the diffusive crack topology. In particular, it allows for the construction of a very robust algorithmic treatment for elastodynamic problems of diffusive fracture. Here, we extend the recently proposed operator split scheme from quasi‐static to dynamic problems. In a typical time step, it successively updates the history field, the crack phase field, and finally the displacement field. We demonstrate the performance of the phase field formulation of fracture by means of representative numerical examples, which show the evolution of complex crack patterns under dynamic loading. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/nme.4387

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Metadata

Authors
Hofacker, M., & Miehe, C.
Venue
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-07-31
Volume
93
Issue
3
Pages
276-301
ISSN
  • 0029-5981 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0207
OpenAlex
W1922503614
Cited by
306
References
22
FWCI
10.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A phase field model of dynamic fracture: Robust field updates for the analysis of complex crack patterns. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/nme.4387
The paper
Hofacker, M., & Miehe, C. (2013). A phase field model of dynamic fracture: Robust field updates for the analysis of complex crack patterns. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.4387

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.