Cited by 19Statistical Methods in Clinical TrialsStatistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceStatistical Methods and Applications

Post hoc tests following analysis of variance

Holm, Karyn, Christman, Norma J.·1985·Research in Nursing & Health

Abstract

Review of nursing research literature revealed that post hoc comparisons of mean differences were not consistently reported, although their use was warranted. This paper describes the critical features of post hoc procedures and offers guidelines for selecting one method over another. Particular attention is given to how various procedures control Type 1 error. Selection of post hoc procedures considering the investigator's desire for control of Type 1 and Type 2 error also is presented.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/nur.4770080215

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 9 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holm, K., & Christman, N. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • University of Kentucky (US)
Corresponding author
Holm, Karyn
Venue
Research in Nursing & Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1985-06
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
207-210
ISSN
  • 0160-6891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-240X
OpenAlex
W1973035946
Cited by
19
References
9
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research in Nursing & Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
Keywords
post hoc tests, multiple comparisons, type I error control, type II error, analysis of variance, reporting guidelines, nursing research
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Humans, Nursing, Statistics as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review