Sharp Force Trauma and Chop Mark Identification Bias: Experimental Evidence on the Effects of Bone Morphology, Cortical Thickness, and Ax Material
Open accessAbstract
Sharp force trauma (SFT) is the main criterion used to identify chop mark butchery in zooarchaeology, yet its reliability as a diagnostic feature has not been systematically tested. Chop marks reflect both cutting and fracturing processes and exhibit characteristics of both sharp and blunt trauma. When present, SFT creates a distinct anthropogenic surface that is easily recognizable, whereas chops lacking SFT can resemble general fracture surfaces. This study investigates the potential bias within chop mark analysis by testing how bone type, cortical thickness, and ax material influence the presence and magnitude of SFT. Medium‐sized mammal femora and cervical vertebrae were impacted using stone, copper, bronze, iron, and modern steel ax heads under controlled energy conditions using the Instron 9440 Drop Tower System. Results modeled with a Bayesian hurdle‐lognormal framework show that bone morphology and tool material jointly determine SFT formation and depth. Iron and steel axes generated SFT more often and with greater depth than stone or copper axes, while femora produced significantly less visible SFT than vertebrae. Reliance on SFT as the main diagnostic criterion introduces material and mechanical bias, obscuring evidence of certain tool types and distorting interpretations of butchery behavior.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
<b>brms</b> : An <i>R</i> Package for Bayesian Multilevel Models Using <i>Stan</i>
Bürkner, P.-C. (2017) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v080.i01 · Cited by 9,476 · see citing works
Applications of Scanning Electron Microscopy to Taphonomic Problems*
Shipman, P. (1981) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1981.tb28179.x · Cited by 270 · see citing works
An Introduction to Zooarchaeology
Gifford-Gonzalez, D. P. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-65682-3 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Scanning Electron Microscopy in Archaeology
Olsen, S. L. (1988) · University of Michigan Press eBooks · doi:10.30861/9780860545798 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
An Experimental Study of the Morphological Characteristics of Tool Marks
Walker, P. L., & Long, J. C. (1977) · American Antiquity · doi:10.2307/278934 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Macroscopic Characteristics of Hacking Trauma
Humphrey, J., & Hutchinson, D. (2001) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1520/jfs14954j · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Long-distance connections in the Copper Age: New evidence from the Alpine Iceman’s copper axe
Artioli, G., Angelini, I., Kaufmann, G., Canovaro, C., Sasso, G. D., & Villa, I. M. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0179263 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Greenfield, H. J. (2013) · Lithic Technology · doi:10.1179/0197726113z.00000000019 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Macroscopic Analysis of Axe and Hatchet Trauma in Fleshed and Defleshed Mammalian Long Bones*
Lynn, K. S., & Fairgrieve, S. I. (2009) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01061.x · Cited by 50 · see citing works
The Advent of the Age of Iron in the Land of Israel: A Review and Reassessment
Gottlieb, Y. (2010) · Tel Aviv · doi:10.1179/033443510x12632070179469 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Interpreting Injury Mechanisms of Blunt Force Trauma from Butterfly Fracture Formation
Reber, S. L., & Simmons, T. L. (2015) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1111/1556-4029.12797 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Applications of Scanning Electron Microscopy in Archaeology
Olsen, S. L. (1988) · Advances in electronics and electron physics · doi:10.1016/s0065-2539(08)60904-x · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Rosen, S. A. (2013) · Lithic Technology · doi:10.1179/0197726113z.00000000023 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Okaluk, T. R., & Greenfield, H. J. (2022) · Quaternary · doi:10.3390/quat5010015 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Self-citationM iddle B ronze A ge II Battleaxes from R ishon L e Z ion, I srael: Archaeology and Metallurgy
Shalev, S., Caspi, E. N., Shilstein, S., Paradowska, A. M., Kockelmann, W. A., Meron, T. K.-C. –., & Levy, Y. (2013) · Archaeometry · doi:10.1111/arcm.12015 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
An experimental investigation of sharp force skeletal trauma with replica Bronze Age weapons
Downing, M., & Fibiger, L. (2017) · Journal of Archaeological Science Reports · doi:10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.12.034 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Ben‐Yosef, E., Yitzhak, V., Edwin, V. D. B., & Be’eri, R. (2016) · Journal of Archaeological Science Reports · doi:10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.08.010 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Microscopic Characteristics of Hacking Trauma
Tucker, B., Hutchinson, D., Gilliland, M., Charles, T., Daniel, H., & Wolfe, L. (2001) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1520/jfs14955j · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Ashkenazi, D., Bunimovitz, S., & Stern, A. (2016) · Journal of Archaeological Science Reports · doi:10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.02.006 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Tamminen, H. M., Ford, A. L. J., Welham, K., Loe, L., Webb, H., Boyle, A., & Smith, M. J. (2023) · American Journal of Biological Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.24697 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Aggrandisers and the first copper-base metallurgy in Southeast Asia
Higham, C. F. (2024) · Antiquity · doi:10.15184/aqy.2024.11 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Microscopic analysis of cut mark characteristics from chopping/hacking tools
McGehee, K. C., & Schultz, J. J. (2024) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2024.112197 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Christensen, A., Rickman, J., & Berryman, H. (2021) · Forensic Anthropology · doi:10.5744/fa.2020.0041 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Analyzing Cut Mark Characteristics on Bone from Chopping/Hacking Tools
McGehee, K. C., Schultz, J. J., & Freidline, S. E. (2023) · Forensic Anthropology · doi:10.5744/fa.2022.0023 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Ehrhardt, K. L. (2014) · Archaeometallurgy in Global Perspective · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-9017-3_13
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Wedel V. L., 2014, Broken Bones: Anthropological Analysis of Blunt Force Trauma
- Wenham S. J., 1989, Weapons and Warfare in Anglo‐Saxon England, 123
- Zephro L., 2014, Broken Bones: Anthropological Analysis of Blunt Force Trauma, 33
Cited by
Still being checked.
- Authors
- Okaluk, T., Dallmann, J., Cohen, H., Greenfield, T. L., & Shai, I.
- Affiliations
- Ariel University (IL)
- The University of Winnipeg (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Okaluk, Tiffany
- ORCID
- Okaluk, Tiffany
- Venue
- International Journal of Osteoarchaeology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2025-12-16
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 88-100
- ISSN
- 1047-482X (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1212
- OpenAlex
- W7115565943
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Osteoarchaeology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Ariel University
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (752‐2023‐0072)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
- Keywords
- sharp force trauma, skeletal morphology, cortical thickness, femur, cervical vertebrae, fracture morphology, zooarchaeology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
