The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New developments in the law for obesity discrimination protection
Abstract
Background: Obese individuals are frequent targets of weight‐based discrimination, particularly in the employment setting. Victims of weight discrimination have sought legal restitution like others who have suffered from different forms of discrimination. However, in the vast majority of the United States, body weight is not a protected class and weight‐based employment discrimination does not provide a basis for a legal claim. Some have attempted to seek legal recourse under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 or the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (collectively, the ADA), which protect against discrimination based on mental or physical disabilities in a variety of settings. Until recently, claims of weight discrimination under the ADA have also been largely unsuccessful. However, Congress recently passed the ADA Amendments Act, expanding the definition of what constitutes a disability and incorporating a broad view of ADA's coverage. Objective: This short communication provides an update of the law as it relates to employment based discrimination of obese people. The authors propose a legislative direction for future legal recourse. Design and Methods: The authors conducted legal research into the ADA Amendments Act, and synthesized this work relating to discrimination against weight in the employment context. Results: In light of the ADA Amendments Act, courts and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission have provided protection for severely obese people from discrimination based on actual or perceived disability in the employment context. Conclusion: The authors discuss this positive legal development and additionally propose a targeted solution to address weight discrimination in the employment setting. National polling suggests there is considerable public support for such a measure. The authors thus recommend the implementation of a “Weight Discrimination in Employment Act” modeled after the Age Discrimination in Employment Act to adequately address this pervasive and damaging injustice toward individuals who are affected by obesity.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Although some US states have introduced legislation protecting against height and weight discrimination, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 does not identify weight as a protected characteristic, and only in some instances a condition of very high BMI can meet the definition of disability under a 2008 amendment of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
“Although some US states have recently introduced a legislation that protects against height and weight discrimination65, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 does not identify weight as a protected characteristic, and only in some instances a condition of very high BMI can meet the definition of disability under a 2008 amendment of the Americans with Disabilities Act legislation66.”
From Joint international consensus statement for ending stigma of obesity (2020) · cites this paper as [66]
Citations
Cites
The Stigma of Obesity: A Review and Update
Puhl, R. M., & Heuer, C. A. (2009) · Obesity · doi:10.1038/oby.2008.636 · Cited by 3,323
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- 10.1038/oby.2008.35 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/ijo.2008.22 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jvb.2008.09.008 · DOI · Paper page
- Flegal KM, 2012, Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of Body Mass Index among US adults, 1999‐2010, JAMA, 307, E1, 10.1001/jama.2012.39 · DOI
- 10.1038/oby.2008.452 · DOI
- 10.1038/oby.2010.126 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Joint international consensus statement for ending stigma of obesity
Rubino, F., Puhl, R. M., Cummings, D. E., Eckel, R. H., Ryan, D. H., Mechanick, J. I., Nadglowski, J., Ramos Salas, X., Schauer, P. R., Twenefour, D., et al. (2020) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-020-0803-x · Cited by 1,152
“Although some US states have recently introduced a legislation that protects against height and weight discrimination 65 , the Civil Rights Act of 1964 does not identify weight as a protected characteristic, and only in some instances a condition of very high BMI can meet the definition of disability under a 2008 amen…”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Pomeranz, J. L., & Puhl, R. M.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pomeranz, Jennifer L.
- Venue
- Obesity
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-03
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 469-471
- ISSN
- 1930-7381 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-739X
- OpenAlex
- W1975797821
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7
- FWCI
- 5.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Obesity (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity and Health Practices
- Social Sciences › Law › Discrimination and Equality Law
- Social Sciences › Law › Business Law and Ethics
- Keywords
- weight discrimination, employment discrimination, ADA Amendments Act, Americans with Disabilities Act, Rehabilitation Act of 1973, definition of disability, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, perceived disability, anti-discrimination law
- MeSH terms
- Body Weight, Discrimination, Psychological, Employment, Persons with Disabilities, Humans, Obesity, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review