Cited by 56Obesity and Health PracticesDiscrimination and Equality LawBusiness Law and Ethics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

New developments in the law for obesity discrimination protection

Abstract

Background: Obese individuals are frequent targets of weight‐based discrimination, particularly in the employment setting. Victims of weight discrimination have sought legal restitution like others who have suffered from different forms of discrimination. However, in the vast majority of the United States, body weight is not a protected class and weight‐based employment discrimination does not provide a basis for a legal claim. Some have attempted to seek legal recourse under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 or the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (collectively, the ADA), which protect against discrimination based on mental or physical disabilities in a variety of settings. Until recently, claims of weight discrimination under the ADA have also been largely unsuccessful. However, Congress recently passed the ADA Amendments Act, expanding the definition of what constitutes a disability and incorporating a broad view of ADA's coverage. Objective: This short communication provides an update of the law as it relates to employment based discrimination of obese people. The authors propose a legislative direction for future legal recourse. Design and Methods: The authors conducted legal research into the ADA Amendments Act, and synthesized this work relating to discrimination against weight in the employment context. Results: In light of the ADA Amendments Act, courts and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission have provided protection for severely obese people from discrimination based on actual or perceived disability in the employment context. Conclusion: The authors discuss this positive legal development and additionally propose a targeted solution to address weight discrimination in the employment setting. National polling suggests there is considerable public support for such a measure. The authors thus recommend the implementation of a “Weight Discrimination in Employment Act” modeled after the Age Discrimination in Employment Act to adequately address this pervasive and damaging injustice toward individuals who are affected by obesity.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/oby.20094

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although some US states have introduced legislation protecting against height and weight discrimination, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 does not identify weight as a protected characteristic, and only in some instances a condition of very high BMI can meet the definition of disability under a 2008 amendment of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

    “Although some US states have recently introduced a legislation that protects against height and weight discrimination65, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 does not identify weight as a protected characteristic, and only in some instances a condition of very high BMI can meet the definition of disability under a 2008 amendment of the Americans with Disabilities Act legislation66.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. 10.1038/oby.2008.35 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1038/ijo.2008.22 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/j.jvb.2008.09.008 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Flegal KM, 2012, Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of Body Mass Index among US adults, 1999‐2010, JAMA, 307, E1, 10.1001/jama.2012.39 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/oby.2008.452 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/oby.2010.126 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Joint international consensus statement for ending stigma of obesity

    Rubino, F., Puhl, R. M., Cummings, D. E., Eckel, R. H., Ryan, D. H., Mechanick, J. I., Nadglowski, J., Ramos Salas, X., Schauer, P. R., Twenefour, D., et al. (2020) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-020-0803-x · Cited by 1,152

    “Although some US states have recently introduced a legislation that protects against height and weight discrimination 65 , the Civil Rights Act of 1964 does not identify weight as a protected characteristic, and only in some instances a condition of very high BMI can meet the definition of disability under a 2008 amen…”
    Background

Metadata

Authors
Pomeranz, J. L., & Puhl, R. M.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Pomeranz, Jennifer L.
Venue
Obesity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-03
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
469-471
ISSN
  • 1930-7381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-739X
OpenAlex
W1975797821
Cited by
56
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7
FWCI
5.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Social Sciences › Law › Discrimination and Equality Law
  • Social Sciences › Law › Business Law and Ethics
Keywords
weight discrimination, employment discrimination, ADA Amendments Act, Americans with Disabilities Act, Rehabilitation Act of 1973, definition of disability, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, perceived disability, anti-discrimination law
MeSH terms
Body Weight, Discrimination, Psychological, Employment, Persons with Disabilities, Humans, Obesity, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review