Cited by 900Obesity and Health PracticesEating Disorders and BehaviorsObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Perceptions of weight discrimination: prevalence and comparison to race and gender discrimination in America

Puhl, R M, Andreyeva, T, Brownell, K D·2008·International Journal of Obesity

Abstract

Objective Limited data are available on the prevalence and patterns of body weight discrimination from representative samples. This study examined experiences of weight/height discrimination in a nationally representative sample of US adults and compared their prevalence and patterns with discrimination experiences based on race and gender.Method and procedures Data were from the National Survey of Midlife Development in the United States, a 1995-1996 community-based survey of English-speaking adults aged 25-74 (N=2290). Reported experiences of weight/height discrimination included a variety of institutional settings and interpersonal relationships. Multivariate regression analyses were used to predict weight/height discrimination controlling for sociodemographic characteristics and body weight status.Results The prevalence of weight/height discrimination ranged from 5% among men to 10% among women, but these average percentages obscure the much higher risk of weight discrimination among heavier individuals (40% for adults with body mass index (BMI) of 35 and above). Younger individuals with a higher BMI had a particularly high risk of weight/height discrimination regardless of their race, education and weight status. Women were at greater risk for weight/height discrimination than men, especially women with a BMI of 30-35 who were three times more likely to report weight/height discrimination compared to male peers of a similar weight.Discussion Weight/height discrimination is prevalent in American society and is relatively close to reported rates of racial discrimination, particularly among women. Both institutional forms of weight/height discrimination (for example, in employment settings) and interpersonal mistreatment due to weight/height (for example, being called names) were common, and in some cases were even more prevalent than discrimination due to gender and race.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ijo.2008.22

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Puhl, R. M., Andreyeva, T., & Brownell, K. D.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Puhl, R M
Venue
International Journal of Obesity
Published
2008-03-04
Volume
32
Issue
6
Pages
992-1000
ISSN
  • 0307-0565 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5497
OpenAlex
W2017069089
Cited by
900
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 56 · 2017: 62 · 2016: 72 · 2015: 54 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 35
FWCI
79.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Yale University
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
weight discrimination, weight status, body mass index, racial discrimination, gender discrimination, institutional discrimination, interpersonal mistreatment, obesity, middle-aged adults, sex differences
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Epidemiologic Methods, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Prejudice, Social Perception, United States, Body Mass Index, Prevalence, Racial Groups, Body Size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review