Cited by 27Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gestational weight loss and perinatal outcomes in overweight and obese women subsequent to diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus

Open access

Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether gestational weight loss (GWL) after the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in overweight and obese women is associated with improved perinatal outcomes. Obesity and GDM are risk factors for adverse perinatal outcomes, but few studies have investigated weight loss during pregnancy in women with these comorbidities. Design and Methods: Retrospective cohort study of 26,205 overweight and obese gestational diabetic women enrolled in the California Diabetes and Pregnancy Program. Women with GWL during program enrollment were compared to those with weight gain. Perinatal outcomes were assessed using chi‐square test and multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results: About 5.2% of women experienced GWL. GWL was associated with decreased odds of macrosomia (aOR 0.63, 95% CI 0.52‐0.77), NICU admission (aOR 0.51, 95% CI 0.27‐0.95), and cesarean delivery (aOR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68‐0.97). Odds of SGA status (aOR 1.69, 95% CI 1.32‐2.17) and preterm delivery <34 weeks (aOR 1.71, 95% CI 1.23‐2.37) were increased. Conclusions: In overweight and obese women with GDM, third trimester weight loss is associated with some improved maternal and neonatal outcomes, although this effect is lessened by increased odds of SGA status and preterm delivery. Further research on weight loss and interventions to improve adherence to weight guidelines in this population is recommended.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/oby.20490

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Modest energy restriction in women with GDM does not increase adverse outcomes or SGA rates compared to the baseline population.

    “Emerging evidence suggests that modest energy restriction in women with GDM does not increase adverse outcomes or SGA rates compared to the baseline population [60,61,62].”

    From Medical Nutrition Therapy for Women with Gestational Diabetes: Current Practice and Future Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [62]

    The Results report increased SGA status and preterm delivery before 34 weeks among women who lost weight after a GDM diagnosis, compared with women who did not lose weight. This contradicts the claim that SGA rates and adverse outcomes did not increase. The study examined observed weight loss in overweight and obese women with GDM, not an intervention imposing modest energy restriction. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. 10.1001/jama.2009.2014 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1097/00006250-200509000-00054 · DOI
  3. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818b5dd9 · DOI
  4. Institute of Medicine (Subcommittees on Nutritional Status and Weight Gain During Pregnancy and Dietary Intake and Nutrient Supplements During Pregnancy, Committee on Nutritional Status During Pregnancy and Lactation, Food and Nutrition Board), 1990, Nutrition During Pregnancy: Part I, Weight Gain; Part II, Nutrient Supplements
  5. Institute of Medicine/National Research Council (Committee to Reexamine IOM Pregnancy Weight Guidelines, Food and Nutrition Board and Board on Children, Youth and Families), 2009, Weight Gain During Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines
  6. 10.1097/01.AOG.0000228960.16678.bd · DOI
  7. 10.1097/01.AOG.0000139515.97799.f6 · DOI
  8. 10.1097/01.AOG.0000247175.63481.5f · DOI
  9. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181f60da7 · DOI
  10. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181f1ad8b · DOI
  11. 10.3945/ajcn.2009.29008 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.3945/ajcn.2010.29726 · DOI
  13. 10.1007/s10995-010-0596-5 · DOI
  14. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182289f42 · DOI
  15. 10.3109/09513590.2010.540597 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02761.x · DOI
  17. 10.3945/ajcn.110.005306 · DOI
  18. 10.1067/mob.2000.107621 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.numecd.2006.12.001 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.ogc.2008.04.002 · DOI
  21. 10.1097/01.AOG.0000195059.82029.74 · DOI
  22. 10.3109/14767058.2010.531323 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Yee, L. M., Cheng, Y. W., Inturrisi, M., & Caughey, A. B.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
Venue
Obesity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-07-05
Volume
21
Issue
12
Pages
E770-4
ISSN
  • 1930-7381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-739X
OpenAlex
W2148928677
Cited by
27
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
3.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • World Health Organization
  • University of California, San Francisco
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K12HD001262)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, maternal obesity, overweight women, perinatal outcomes, macrosomia, small for gestational age, preterm birth, cesarean section, neonatal intensive care admission
MeSH terms
Adult, California, Cesarean Section, Female, Fetal Macrosomia, Humans, Obesity, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Pregnancy Outcome, Pregnancy Trimester, Third, Retrospective Studies, Weight Loss, Body Mass Index, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Diabetes, Gestational, Overweight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review