Cited by 12Obesity, Physical Activity, DietRegulation of Appetite and ObesityBariatric Surgery and Outcomes

Overstated metabolic adaptation after “the biggest loser” intervention

Open access
Kuchnia, Adam, Huizenga, Robert, Frankenfield, David, Matthie, James R., Earthman, Carrie P.·2016·Obesity

Abstract

The recent Obesity publication by Fothergill et al. (1) on the "The Biggest Loser" contestants (BLC) asserts that intensive exercise-centric intervention, despite fat-free mass (FFM) retention, leads to persistent metabolic adaptation (MA), thwarting long-term weight loss success.Their case rests upon predicting resting metabolic rate (RMR) using a newly developed, unvalidated, regression-derived equation [different from their previous equation in the same population (2)], with potentially error-prone weighted variables.The authors used baseline BLC data to predict RMR at subsequent time points in the same subjects.This is concerning, given the small sample (n 5 16, which makes identifying four robust predictors statistically suspect), lack of validation in an independent sample, and the fact that the 1,000 kcal/day y-intercept is high compared with other established, validated equations.When we apply their data to these other equations, the predicted RMR is much lower and the apparent MA is less prominent.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/oby.21638

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuchnia, A., Huizenga, R., Frankenfield, D., Matthie, J. R., & Earthman, C. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (US)
  • Matthie and Company La Jolla California USA
Corresponding author
Earthman, Carrie P.
Venue
Obesity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-09
Volume
24
Issue
10
Pages
2025-2025
ISSN
  • 1930-7381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-739X
OpenAlex
W2512776629
Cited by
12
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Keywords
metabolic adaptation, The Biggest Loser, resting metabolic rate, fat-free mass, weight loss, exercise intervention, equation validation
MeSH terms
Humans, Obesity, Weight Loss

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review