Cited by 32Melanoma and MAPK PathwaysColorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations

Phase I Study of Afatinib and Selumetinib in Patients with KRAS-Mutated Colorectal, Non-Small Cell Lung, and Pancreatic Cancer

Open access
Brummelen, Emilie M.J., Huijberts, Sanne, Herpen, Carla, Desar, Ingrid, Opdam, Frans, Geel, Robin, Marchetti, Serena, Steeghs, Neeltje +7 more·2021·The Oncologist

Abstract

Lessons Learned: Afatinib and selumetinib can be combined in continuous and intermittent dosing schedules, albeit at lower doses than approved for monotherapy. Maximum tolerated dose for continuous and intermittent schedules is afatinib 20 mg once daily and selumetinib 25 mg b.i.d. Because the anticancer activity was limited, further development of this combination is not recommended until better biomarkers for response and resistance are defined. Background: Antitumor effects of MEK inhibitors are limited in KRAS-mutated tumors because of feedback activation of upstream epidermal growth factor receptors, which reactivates the MAPK and the phosphoinositide 3-kinase–AKT pathway. Therefore, this phase I trial was initiated with the pan-HER inhibitor afatinib plus the MEK inhibitor selumetinib in patients with KRAS mutant, PIK3CA wild-type tumors. Methods: Afatinib and selumetinib were administered according to a 3+3 design in continuous and intermittent schedules. The primary objective was safety, and the secondary objective was clinical efficacy. Results: Twenty-six patients were enrolled with colorectal cancer (n = 19), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (n = 6), and pancreatic cancer (n = 1). Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in six patients, including grade 3 diarrhea, dehydration, decreased appetite, nausea, vomiting, and mucositis. The recommended phase II dose (RP2D) was 20 mg afatinib once daily (QD) and 25 mg selumetinib b.i.d. (21 days on/7 days off) for continuous afatinib dosing and for intermittent dosing with both drugs 5 days on/2 days off. Efficacy was limited with disease stabilization for 221 days in a patient with NSCLC as best response. Conclusion: Afatinib and selumetinib can be combined in continuous and intermittent schedules in patients with KRAS mutant tumors. Although target engagement was observed, the clinical efficacy was limited.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/onco.13631

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Early-phase clinical trials evaluating afatinib with selumetinib, dacomitinib with PD-0325901, and cobimetinib with atezolizumab failed to prove efficacy.

    “Early-phase clinical trials evaluating combinations such as afatinib (a pan-HER inhibitor) with selumetinib (a MEK inhibitor), dacomitinib (a panHER inhibitor) with PD-0325901 (a MEK1/2 inhibitor), and cobimetinib (a MEK inhibitor) with atezolizumab (an anti-PDL1), have failed to prove efficacy [78,79,80].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brummelen, E. M. J., Huijberts, S., Herpen, C., Desar, I., Opdam, F., Geel, R., Marchetti, S., Steeghs, N., Monkhorst, K., Thijssen, B., Rosing, H., Huitema, A., Beijnen, J., Bernards, R., & Schellens, J.
Affiliations
  • The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL)
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Corresponding author
  • Huijberts, Sanne
  • Opdam, Frans
Venue
The Oncologist
Published
2020-12-29
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
290-e545
ISSN
  • 1083-7159 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-490X
OpenAlex
W3111380117
Cited by
32
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6
FWCI
1.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Oncologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
AstraZeneca
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Keywords
afatinib, selumetinib, KRAS mutation, colorectal cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, MEK inhibitors, pan-HER inhibitor, combination therapy, intermittent dosing, dose-limiting toxicity, MAPK signaling, target engagement, maximum tolerated dose
MeSH terms
Afatinib, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Benzimidazoles, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Humans, Lung, Lung Neoplasms, Mutation, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Colorectal Neoplasms, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases, Protein Kinase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review