Artificial intelligence and income inequality: Do technological changes and worker's position matter?
Abstract
The technological progress in artificial intelligence (AI) has led to mass unemployment and various types of inequalities in the recent years. This study is an attempt to see how income inequality has increased with the changes in technology. The study also investigated how technology such as AI has affected (directly or indirectly) to working position and working process of workers. Analysis of the study is based on the data of automation and Gini-coefficients. The study finds that the relationship between AI and income distribution has always been considered negative and this is what has been observed in this study and it directly affects the distribution of income and jobs. Due to the automation, low and medium skill jobs are declining, and unemployment is increasing, further the income gap between middle and high skill labor is increasing. Gini-coefficients of developing nations are higher than in developed nations, indicating that income inequality in developing nations is higher than the developed nations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
If left unaddressed, these blindnesses auger a future where the integration of AI into every nook and cranny of our societies will radically entrench economic inequality.
“If left unaddressed, these blindnesses auger a future where the integration of AI into every nook and cranny of our societies will radically entrench economic inequality (Clark and Gevorkyan 2020;Goyal and Aneja 2020;Kim 2022)”
From Abundant intelligences: placing AI within Indigenous knowledge frameworks (2025) · cites this paper as Goyal and Aneja 2020
Cites
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2 · Cited by 6,220 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Abundant intelligences: placing AI within Indigenous knowledge frameworks
Lewis, J. E., Whaanga, H., & Yolgörmez, C. (2025) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-024-02099-4 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
- Authors
- Goyal, A., & Aneja, R.
- Affiliations
- Central University of Haryana (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Aneja, Ranjan
- Venue
- Journal of Public Affairs
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-09-02
- ISSN
- 1472-3891 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-1854
- OpenAlex
- W3083694288
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 3.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Public Affairs (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Economic Growth and Development
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence, income inequality, automation, technological change, unemployment, skill-biased technological change, Gini coefficient, income distribution, low-skilled jobs, developed and developing countries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review