Cited by 81Ethics and Social Impacts of AIIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsFeminist Epistemology and Gender Studies

Abundant intelligences: placing AI within Indigenous knowledge frameworks

Open access
Lewis, Jason Edward, Whaanga, Hēmi, Yolgörmez, Ceyda·2025·AI & SOCIETY

Abstract

The current trajectory of artificial intelligence development suffers from fundamental epistemological shortcomings, resulting in the systematic operationalization of bias against non-white, non-male, and non-Western peoples. We argue that these failings are, in part, the result of certain Western rationalist epistemologies that exclude many ways of knowing about the world, and therefore they cannot provide a sufficient foundation on which to adequately, robustly, and humanely conceptualize intelligence. We present a new research agenda, Abundant Intelligences, an Indigenous-led, Indigenous-majority international, interdisciplinary research program that imagines anew how to conceptualize and design artificial intelligence (AI) based on Indigenous knowledge (IK) systems. Abundant Intelligences draws on the rich plurality of Indigenous knowledge systems, bringing together diverse sets of thought, culture, and protocol together. We show IK systems provide one way to rebuild AI’s epistemological foundations and transform these tools’ current role in reinforcing colonial practices of exclusion, extraction, manipulation, and eradication into engines of abundance that enable us to care better for ourselves, our communities, and our world. Our proposition is to fully engage with AI to explore how different conceptions of intelligence could be embodied in these technologies. In this paper, we present the tenets of the research program in detail, account for our methodological approach, describe the impact and limitations, and conclude on a discussion of the implications of the program.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The authors argue that AI's problems are fundamentally epistemological rather than merely ethical, stemming from Western rationalist frameworks that treat intelligence as a property of isolated individuals. They propose Abundant Intelligences, an Indigenous-led, Indigenous-majority international research program that rebuilds AI's foundations on Indigenous knowledge systems organized around relationality, regeneration, generosity, and reciprocity.

Key findings

  • The paper's central claim is that "the AI industry-academic complex does not have an ethics problem, it does, however, have an epistemology problem," producing systematic bias against non-white, non-male, and non-Western peoples.
  • Mainstream AI definitions, exemplified by Legg and Hutter's "Intelligence measures an agent's general ability to achieve goals in a wide range of environments," are critiqued for treating intelligence as a property of a discrete, self-contained agent and ignoring the relational, cultural, and environmental conditions in which intelligence emerges. The authors trace this lineage to Linda Gottfredson's 1994 *Wall Street Journal* definition and its connections to eugenics and the Pioneer Fund.
  • The program is organized around three axes — Integrations, Imaginaries, and Intelligences — and identifies five technical areas for engagement: language (NLP for low-resource Indigenous languages), storytelling, environmental stewardship, multi-agent systems, and socio-neuro AI.
  • The research team comprises individuals from 16 Indigenous communities across Aotearoa New Zealand, North America, the Pacific, and Africa; the program currently has four Pods (Haudenosaunee-Niitsitapi, Ka Hawai'i Pae Aina, Aotearoa, and Wihanble S'a) and hopes to eventually have at least six.

Methods

  • This is a research-agenda/programmatic paper, not an empirical study; the authors state "No data has been used in this article."
  • Macro methodology: three axes — Integrations (synthesizing IK with AI research frameworks), Imaginaries (future imaginaries and speculative design workshops), and Intelligences (prototyping culturally grounded AI).
  • Conduct of research: locally rooted "Pods" anchored in Indigenous-centered labs, using mixed methods (research-creation, Indigenous qualitative research, and Indigenous-led quantitative research), governed by OCAP and CARE data sovereignty principles. A six-phase micro methodology is outlined: understand, imagine, formalize, develop, implement, integrate.

Limitations

  • Stated risks: integrating IK and computational practices "may turn out to be too difficult, or, worse, unsuited to transforming AI research"; epistemic gaps "might be too wide to meaningfully bridge"; initial relations across cultural, geographic, and institutional differences may be difficult to maintain; complexities of IK interacting with Western intellectual property regimes and data sovereignty; challenges integrating participants across computational sciences, natural sciences, humanities, arts, and community backgrounds; and skepticism among Indigenous communities about sharing knowledge with academia and industry.
  • The paper also acknowledges that even if outcomes fall short, benefits would include relationship networks, diversification of AI research, increased numbers of trained Indigenous researchers, and experimental models for data sovereignty.
  • Evident from the text: the paper reports no empirical results, prototypes, or evaluated outcomes — all impacts and outcomes are anticipated rather than demonstrated.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00146-024-02099-4

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

5 of 25 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    The historical alliance between colonialism, capitalism, and research practices involved traditional knowledges being extracted from communities to serve Western science and commerce at the expense of those communities.

    “We are mindful of the historical alliance between colonialism, capitalism, and research practices where traditional knowledges were extracted from communities to serve Western science and commerce at the expense of those communities (e.g., Abbass et al. 2022).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Abbass et al. 2022 source

      Sections 2.1–2.2 describe Aboriginal languages and explain how the authors drew on Jingulu grammar for an AI-teaming language. They do not address a historical alliance between colonialism, capitalism, and research, or say that traditional knowledge was extracted for Western science and commerce at communities’ expense. Searches for those concepts and for Indigenous-knowledge appropriation found no supporting passage in our copy; page numbers were unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.73)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Interpretationcitation

    There are deep-seated connections between white supremacy and the quest of artificial general intelligence (AGI).

    “One thing to address here in Legg and Hutter's definition is the deep-seated connections between white supremacy and the quest of artificial general intelligence (AGI).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Andrews et al. 2024 source

      The Introduction discusses the revival of physiognomic research through machine learning, and “A history of misbegotten science” links physiognomy and eugenics to racial hierarchies. Neither passage addresses the pursuit of artificial general intelligence or connects that pursuit to white supremacy. Searches for AGI, general intelligence, and Legg and Hutter found no passage making the attributed point. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Interpretationcitation

    The epistemic failings are inextricably linked with the ethical failings we observe in AI today.

    “As the prevalence of pseudoscientific formulations in AI is increasingly targeted by critical scholars (e.g., Andrews et al. 2024), it becomes clearer how the epistemic failings are inextricably linked with the ethical failings we observe in AI today.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Andrews et al. 2024 source
  • Interpretationcitation

    If left unaddressed, these blindnesses auger a future where the integration of AI into every nook and cranny of our societies will radically entrench economic inequality.

    “If left unaddressed, these blindnesses auger a future where the integration of AI into every nook and cranny of our societies will radically entrench economic inequality (Clark and Gevorkyan 2020;Goyal and Aneja 2020;Kim 2022)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Clark and Gevorkyan 2020 source
    • cites Goyal and Aneja 2020 source
    • cites Kim 2022

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Interpretationreasoning

    AI systems incorporate deep structural blindnesses and biases that render them incompetent, even dangerous, when confronted with the complexity and variety of human social systems.

    “Namely, these systems incorporate deep structural blindnesses and biases that render them incompetent, even dangerous, when confronted with the complexity and variety of human social systems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 32
  • May combine two claims. 12
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationcitation

    If left unaddressed, these blindnesses auger a future where the integration of AI into every nook and cranny of our societies will cement white supremacy into the core operating system(s) of the world.

    “cement white supremacy into the core operating system(s) of the world (Cave and Dihal 2020;Katz 2020;Phan 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Cave and Dihal 2020 source

      The Conclusion and Implications (section 4; page not provided) says White portrayals of AI can sustain racial prejudice and contribute to products that benefit one group while disadvantaging others. It also warns that racialised AI could exacerbate injustice in automated decisions. These conditional, specific harms support the concern, but not the stronger prediction that AI's integration throughout society will cement white supremacy into the world's core operating systems. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Katz 2020 source
    • cites Phan 2019 source

      In “Race, Voice, and Figurative Narratives” (page unavailable), Phan argues that Alexa’s white-speaking persona erases histories of racialized exploitation and that such figurations can shape attitudes to power. The Conclusion (page unavailable) also describes how Alexa obscures exploited, predominantly racialized labor. The paper does not establish the broader prediction that AI throughout society will cement white supremacy into the world’s core systems. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    These failings are, in part, the result of certain Western rationalist epistemologies that exclude many ways of knowing about the world, and therefore they cannot provide a sufficient foundation on which to adequately, robustly, and humanely conceptualize intelligence.

    “We argue that these failings are, in part, the result of certain Western rationalist epistemologies that exclude many ways of knowing about the world, and therefore they cannot provide a sufficient foundation on which to adequately, robustly, and humanely conceptualize intelligence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The current trajectory of AI development suffers from fundamental epistemological shortcomings, resulting in the systematic operationalization of bias against non-white, non-male, and non-Western peoples.

    “The current trajectory of artificial intelligence development suffers from fundamental epistemological shortcomings, resulting in the systematic operationalization of bias against non-white, non-male, and non-Western peoples.”
    • Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · plain
      “The current trajectory of AI development suffers from fundamental epistemological shortcomings, resulting in the systematic operationalization of bias against non-white, non-male, and non-Western peoples.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The Abundant Intelligences project enables cultural-technical collaborations between Indigenous communities, brings together scientific practice with cultural concerns, and creates a test bed for technologies imagined in the communities and prototyped with AI expertise.

    “The project enables cultural-technical collaborations between Indigenous communities, brings together scientific practice with cultural concerns, and creates a test bed for various technologies imagined in the communities and prototyped in collaboration with world-class AI expertise.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The notion of intelligence is increasingly impoverished under the banner of AI.

    “From our perspective, it is clear that the notion of intelligence is increasingly impoverished under the banner of AI, and bringing in the notion of abundance is a direct response to this.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    This blindness stems from an intellectual lineage heavily infected with Cartesian duality, monotheistic eschatology, and computational reductionism.

    “This blindness stems from an intellectual lineage heavily infected with Cartesian duality, monotheistic eschatology, and computational reductionism.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    When one treats intelligence as a property of an individual that can be analytically abstracted and not a collectively established relationality, the wider matrix in which our attributions of intelligence to certain activities or proclivities become obscured.

    “When one treats intelligence as a property of an individual that can be analytically abstracted and not a collectively established relationality, the wider matrix in which our attributions of intelligence to certain activities or proclivities become obscured.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The summer intensives and Pod workshops enable Indigenous groups to be more actively involved with the creation and deployment of AI systems.

    “The summer intensives and Pod workshops enable Indigenous groups to be more actively involved with the creation and deployment of AI systems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Integrating AI into Indigenous knowledge practices will be the latest example of this ongoing innovation.

    “Integrating AI into their knowledge practices will be but the latest example of this ongoing innovation (Whaanga and Mato 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Whaanga and Mato 2020 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Legg and Hutter's definition falls short because it takes intelligence to be a property of a singular and individual entity.

    “However, Legg and Hutter's definition falls short in our consideration as it takes intelligence to be a property of a singular and individual entity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    What is missing from most operationalized definitions of intelligence, including Legg and Hutters', is the very cultural context in which all such intelligent operations take place.

    “What is missing from most operationalized definitions of intelligence, including Legg and Hutters', is the very cultural context in which all such intelligent operations take place.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Western scientific framework prioritizes climbing a ladder of abstraction to reach simple universal principles that can be applied across all individuals, communities, and territories.

    “This can make it seem unruly when viewed from within a Western scientific framework, which prioritizes climbing a ladder of abstraction to reach simple universal principles that can be applied across all individuals, communities, and territories.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    IK systems provide one way to rebuild AI's epistemological foundations and transform these tools' current role in reinforcing colonial practices of exclusion, extraction, manipulation, and eradication into engines of abundance that enable us to care better for ourselves, our communities, and our world.

    “We show IK systems provide one way to rebuild AI's epistemological foundations and transform these tools' current role in reinforcing colonial practices of exclusion, extraction, manipulation, and eradication into engines of abundance that enable us to care better for ourselves, our communities, and our world.”
    • Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
      “IK systems provide one way to rebuild AI's epistemological foundations and transform these tools' current role in reinforcing colonial practices of exclusion, extraction, manipulation, and eradication into engines of abundance that enable us to care better for ourselves, our communities, and our world.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    IK systems are a class of epistemologies reflecting a different understanding of intelligence, offering alternative methods for considering how knowledge is generated, validated, and propagated.

    “IK systems are a class of epistemologies reflecting a different understanding of intelligence, offering alternative methods for considering how knowledge is generated, validated, and propagated (Cajete 2000;Descola 2013;Hester & Cheney 2001;Little Bear & Heavy Head 2004;Meyer 2003;Posthumus 2018;Smith 2016;Turner 2006;Waters 2004).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Cajete 2000

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Descola 2013

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Hester & Cheney 2001 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    This makes AI system engineers blind to vital aspects of human existence-such as trust, care, and community-that are fundamental to how intelligence actually operates.

    “This makes AI system engineers blind to vital aspects of human existence-such as trust, care, and community-that are fundamental to how intelligence actually operates.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The hegemonic weight of the ideology of intelligence is imbued to a large degree by the AI enterprise, propagating the assumption that intelligence is an abstractable property that is self-contained and self-evident, all the while erasing different notions of intelligence from consideration.

    “The hegemonic weight of the ideology of intelligence is indeed imbued to a large degree by the AI enterprise, propagating the assumption that intelligence is an abstractable property that is self-contained and self-evident, all the while erasing different notions of intelligence from consideration.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The Abundant Intelligences project serves as a model for other projects seeking to tackle similar issues through locally rooted research and creation Pods exploring fundamental questions pertaining to AI with a participatory and inclusive approach.

    “Furthermore, it serves as a model for other projects seeking to tackle similar issues through locally rooted research and creation Pods exploring fundamental questions pertaining to AI with a participatory and inclusive approach.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The research team is composed of individuals from 16 Indigenous communities from across Aotearoa New Zealand, North America, the Pacific, and Africa.

    “The research team itself is composed of individuals from 16 Indigenous communities from across Aotearoa New Zealand, North America, the Pacific, and Africa.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    IK systems have considerable potential, as much of them rest on a relational approach.

    “IK systems have considerable potential, as much of them rest on a relational approach.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    A big portion of the intelligence question lies in the normative conditions that valorize and provide meaning as well as power to certain actions over others.

    “A big portion of the intelligence question lies in the normative conditions that valorize and provide meaning as well as power to certain actions over others.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Such environments are defined, in no small part, by the cultural structure of specific human communities and their relations to the natural world.

    “Such environments are defined, in no small part, by the cultural structure of specific human communities and their relations to the natural world.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    IK insists on retaining the complexity of lived experience.

    “Furthermore, IK insists on retaining the complexity of lived experience.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The environmental cost of AI systems has been a significant point of contention, especially generative AI technologies, but also others, because of their resource-intensiveness.

    “For example, the environmental cost of AI systems has been a significant point of contention, especially generative AI technologies, but also others, because of their resource-intensiveness (Bender et al. 2021;Strubell et al. 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bender et al. 2021 source
    • cites Strubell et al. 2019

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    IK systems describe a multidimensional world that is in a flux, and seek out embodiments that can take shape in this constant becoming.

    “They describe a multidimensional world that is in a flux, and seek out embodiments that can take shape in this constant becoming (Little Bear and Heavy Head 2004).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Little Bear and Heavy Head 2004

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The Legg and Hutter definition draws from a 'mainstream scientific definition of intelligence' developed by Linda Gottfredson.

    “The Legg and Hutter definition is a good example here: they draw from a 'mainstream scientific definition of intelligence', a public statement published in the Wall Street Journal in 1994, as developed by Linda Gottrfredson.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Legg and Hutter 2007 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Stories, songs, dance, and lore all embed knowledge about the world and facilitate its rigorous transmission from one generation to the next.

    “Stories, songs, dance, and lore all embed knowledge about the world and facilitate its rigorous transmission from one generation to the next.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The need to redefine or expand the scope of what intelligent action means emerges from the narrow definitions of intelligence that underlie the AI systems and research.

    “This need emerges from the narrow definitions of intelligence that underlie the AI systems and research.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Abundant Intelligences establishes a platform for bringing together expertise from a multitude of disciplines, localities, and cultures.

    “Abundant Intelligences establishes a platform for bringing together expertise from a multitude of disciplines, localities, and cultures”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Separating mind from the body, elevating after-life over present-life, and violently forcing all experience into binary terms to make it (appear to be) computable produces impoverished notions of what constitutes human intelligence.

    “Separating mind from the body, elevating after-life over present-life, and violently forcing all experience into binary terms to make it (appear to be) computable produces impoverished notions of what constitutes human intelligence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This form of scientific racism still reverberates today, and definitions developed under such paradigms seem to be unproblematically employed by AGI researchers.

    “This form of scientific racism still reverberates today, 6 and definitions developed under such paradigms seem to be unproblematically employed by AGI researchers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Defining 'appropriate' function and useful 'foresight' requires a deep understanding of the different environments in which intelligent machines might operate.

    “We argue that defining 'appropriate' function and useful 'foresight' requires a deep understanding of the different environments in which intelligent machines might operate.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    These systems do not occur in a vacuum; they are always already entangled with the (cultural, social, political, physical, economic) world around them.

    “Yet, these systems do not occur in a vacuum; they are always already entangled with the (cultural, social, political, physical, economic) world around them.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    This difference in approaches provides a generative ground for considering alternative approaches to creating AI.

    “This difference in approaches provide a generative ground for considering alternative approaches to creating AI.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Legg and Hutter's view does not consider the relational structures that precede the actor, the web of relations into which the agent always-already arrives.

    “This view does not consider the relational structures that precede the actor, the web of relations into which the agent always-already arrives.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Indigenous epistemologies include observe-hypothesize-test iterations of the Western scientific method, but also practices excluded by it.

    “Indigenous epistemologies include observe-hypothesize-test iterations of the Western scientific method, but also practices excluded by it.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The project's online presence ensures a robust utilization of digital dissemination opportunities, contributing to debates on ethical AI design and emerging scholarship on the social and cultural aspects of AI.

    “The project's online presence (e.g., through our website) ensures a robust utilization of digital dissemination opportunities, thus contributing to debates on ethical AI design and emerging scholarship on the social and cultural aspects of AI.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    These systems are being increasingly tasked with interactions that have deep social, political, and legal consequences, yet the field seems to continue to fetishize rational goal seeking as the definition of intelligence.

    “These systems are being increasingly tasked with interactions that have deep social, political, and legal consequences, yet the field seems to continue to fetishize rational goal seeking as the definition of intelligence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Mainstream definitions in AI treat intelligence as something that pertains to an individual, and disregard the cultural, social, and environmental conditions in which an intelligence emerges.

    “Mainstream definitions in AI treat intelligence as something that pertains to an individual, and disregard the cultural, social, and environmental conditions in which an intelligence emerges.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
38 of 38
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    AI is still in early developmental stages.

    “We argue that interdisciplinary research and research-creation reimagining the AI project is required now, while AI is still in early developmental stages, and urgently before deeply problematic assumptions about how people behave and interact with each other and their environment is encoded into the foundations of our sociotechnical systems.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Deeply problematic assumptions about how people behave and interact with each other and their environment are being encoded into the foundations of our sociotechnical systems.

    “We argue that interdisciplinary research and research-creation reimagining the AI project is required now, while AI is still in early developmental stages, and urgently before deeply problematic assumptions about how people behave and interact with each other and their environment is encoded into the foundations of our sociotechnical systems.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Many Indigenous communities are skeptical about sharing their knowledge with academia and industry.

    “complicated further by the fact that many Indigenous communities are skeptical about sharing their knowledge with academia and industry.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Being Indigenous does not correlate to a monolithic landscape of values.

    “We recognize that being Indigenous does not correlate to a monolithic landscape of values; indeed the project supports the diversity of Indigenous thought and practice as a benefit to knowledge creation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Scientists and Indigenous peoples have had their encounters marked by colonial violence and power asymmetries.

    “Scientists and Indigenous peoples have had their encounters marked by colonial violence and power asymmetries.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The way in which the relationship between colonizing forces and Indigenous people worked before was with a top-down organization where colonizing forces took decisions for the Indigenous people and imposed the results onto the communities.

    “The way in which that relationship worked before was with a top-down organization where colonizing forces took decisions for the Indigenous people and imposed the results onto the communities.”
6 of 6

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Second research axis has two names

    Minor

    The overview names the second axis "Imaginations," but the following description and dedicated paragraph call it "Imaginaries."

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Adams R (2025) The new empire of AI: the future of global inequality. Polity Press. https://www.indigo.ca/en-ca/the-new-empire-of-ai-the-future-of-global-inequality/9781509553099.html
  2. Aylett R (2000) Emergent narrative, social immersion and “storification.” In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Narrative and Interactive Learning Environments, pp 35–44
  3. Brown AM (2017) Emergent strategy: shaping change, changing worlds. AK Press, California
  4. Daston L (2018) Calculation and the Division of Labor, 1750–1950. Bull Ger Hist Inst 62(Spring):9–30
  5. Eaglin JM (2017) Constructing recidivism risk. Emory Law J 67(1):59–122
  6. Eubanks V (2018) Automating inequality: how high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor (1st edition). St. Martin’s Press, New York
  7. Kim P (2022) AI and inequality. In: Johnson K, Reyes C (eds), Forthcoming in the Cambridge handbook on artificial intelligence & the law. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3938578
  8. Kovach M (2021) Indigenous methodologies: characteristics, conversations, and contexts. University of Toronto Press, Toronto
  9. Maracle L (2017) Ravensong—A novel (2nd edition). Women’s Press, London
  10. Simpson LB (2014) Land as pedagogy: Nishnaabeg intelligence and rebellioustransformation. Decolon Indigeneity, Educ Soc 3(3):1–25
  11. Smith LT (2016) Indigenous knowledge, methodology and mayhem: What is the role of methodology in producing indigenous insights? A discussion from Mātauranga Māori. Knowl Cult 4(3):131–156
  12. Smith LT (2012) Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples (2nd edition). Zed Books
  13. Stone P, Brooks R, Brynjolfsson E, Calo R, Etzioni O, Hager G, Hirschberg J, Kalyanakrishnan S, Kamar E, Kraus S, Leyton-Brown K, Parkes D, Press W, Saxenian A, Shah J, Tambe M, Teller A (2016) Artificial Intelligence and Life in 2030 (Report of the 2015 Study Panel. Stanford University, One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence)
  14. Toupin S (2024) Feminist artificial intelligence: a new era. Politics and rights review. https://politicsrights.com/feminist-artificial-intelligence-a-new-era/. Accessed 15 May 2024
  15. Tucker WH (2002) The funding of scientific racism: Wickliffe Draper and the Pioneer Fund (pp x, 286). University of Illinois Press, Champaign
  16. Turner DA (2006) This is not a peace pipe: towards a critical indigenous philosophy. University of Toronto Press, Toronto
  17. Walter M, Andersen C (2013) Indigenous statistics: a quantitative research methodology. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA
  18. Witehira JGP (2013) Tārai Kōrero Toi: articulating a Māori design language, Doctoral Dissertation, Massey University. http://hdl.handle.net/10179/5213
  19. Zuboff S (2020) The age of surveillance capitalism: the fight for a human future at the new frontier of power (First Trade Paperback Edition). PublicAffairs

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lewis, J. E., Whaanga, H., & Yolgörmez, C.
Affiliations
  • Concordia University (CA)
  • Massey University (NZ)
Corresponding author
Yolgörmez, Ceyda
Venue
AI & SOCIETY
Published
2024-10-19
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
2141-2157
ISSN
  • 0951-5666 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-5655
OpenAlex
W4403567707
Cited by
80
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 62 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 2
FWCI
33.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
AI & Society (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (895-2023-1022)
  • Canada Research Coordinating Committee (NFRFT-2022-00241)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
Keywords
artificial intelligence, indigenous knowledge, epistemology of AI, concept of intelligence, colonialism, Western rationalism, algorithmic bias, Indigenous-led research, embodied knowledge

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-30.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-30.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review