The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Effects of California's Paid Family Leave Program on Mothers’ Leave‐Taking and Subsequent Labor Market Outcomes
Open accessAbstract
This analysis uses March Current Population Survey data from 1999 to 2010 and a differences‐in‐differences approach to examine how California's first in the nation paid family leave (PFL) program affected leave‐taking by mothers following childbirth, as well as subsequent labor market outcomes. We obtain robust evidence that the California program doubled the overall use of maternity leave, increasing it from an average of three to six weeks for new mothers—with some evidence of particularly large growth for less advantaged groups. We also provide evidence that PFL increased the usual weekly work hours of employed mothers of 1‐ to 3‐year‐old children by 10 to 17 percent and that their wage incomes may have risen by a similar amount.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates?
Bertrand, M., Duflo, E., & Mullainathan, S. (2004) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355304772839588 · Cited by 10,641
Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion
Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009) · doi:10.1515/9781400829828 · Cited by 9,467
Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion
Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2008) · doi:10.2307/j.ctvcm4j72 · Cited by 5,051
Inference with Difference-in-Differences and Other Panel Data
Donald, S. G., & Lang, K. (2007) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest.89.2.221 · Cited by 1,324
The Economic Consequences of Parental Leave Mandates: Lessons from Europe
Ruhm, C. J. (1998) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355398555586 · Cited by 858
Self-citation
Cited by
Olivetti, C., & Petrongolo, B. (2017) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.31.1.205 · Cited by 552
Perinatal Depression: Challenges and Opportunities
Dagher, R. K., Bruckheim, H. E., Colpe, L. J., Edwards, E., & White, D. B. (2021) · Journal of Women's Health · doi:10.1089/jwh.2020.8862 · Cited by 285
Paid family leave's effect on hospital admissions for pediatric abusive head trauma
Klevens, J., Luo, F., Xu, L., Peterson, C., & Latzman, N. E. (2016) · Injury Prevention · doi:10.1136/injuryprev-2015-041702 · Cited by 127
Paid Family Leave and Mental Health in the U.S.: A Quasi-Experimental Study of State Policies
Irish, A. M., White, J. S., Modrek, S., & Hamad, R. (2021) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2021.03.018 · Cited by 45
Koebel, K., & Schirle, T. (2016) · Canadian Public Policy · doi:10.3138/cpp.2015-049 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Rossin‐Slater, M., Ruhm, C. J., & Waldfogel, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Policy Analysis and Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-12-17
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 224-245
- ISSN
- 0276-8739 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6688
- OpenAlex
- W2132851839
- Cited by
- 424
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 35.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
