The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Haematogenous metastastic patterns in colonic carcinoma: An analysis of 1541 necropsies
Abstract
The sequence of events in haematogenous metastasis from colonic carcinoma was analysed, using 1541 necropsy reports from 16 centres. The findings are consistent with the cascade hypothesis that metastases develop in discrete steps, first in the liver, next in the lungs and finally, in other sites. Deviations of necropsy findings from the cascade model are largely explained on the basis of false negative reports. In only 216 of 1194 cases was there suggestive evidence that metastatic patterns (excluding lymph nodes) were causally related to lymphatic or non‐haematogenous pathways. The incidence of metastatic involvement in ‘other’ (quaternary) sites correlated with target organ blood‐flow (ml min‐) per g, only when bone marrow and thyroid were excluded. In the thyroid the incidence was lower than expected on the basis of blood flow per g tissue; this may indicate that the thyroid is an unfavourable site for metastatic growth of colonic carcinoma. In the bone marrow it is higher; the latter may be due to delivery of cancer cells via both arterial blood and the vertebral venous plexus. Recognition of this pattern of metastases in the bone marrow could be important with respect of diagnosis and therapy, in patients with colonic carcinoma.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Palliative chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
Colorectal Cancer Collaborative Group (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.321.7260.531 · Cited by 662
Adam, R., Avisar, E., Ariche, A., Giachetti, S., Azoulay, D., Castaing, D., Kunstlinger, F., Levi, F., & Bismuth, F. (2001) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1007/s10434-001-0347-3 · Cited by 657
Unravelling tumour heterogeneity by single-cell profiling of circulating tumour cells
Keller, L., & Pantel, K. (2019) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-019-0180-2 · Cited by 544
Metastatic pattern in colorectal cancer is strongly influenced by histological subtype
Hugen, N., van de Velde, C. J. H., de Wilt, J. H. W., & Nagtegaal, I. D. (2014) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdt591 · Cited by 503
Metastatic spread in patients with gastric cancer
Riihimäki, M., Hemminki, A., Sundquist, K., Sundquist, J., & Hemminki, K. (2016) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.10740 · Cited by 462
Metadata
- Authors
- Weiss, L., Grundmann, E., Torhorst, J., Hartveit, F., Moberg, I., Eder, M., Fenoglio‐Preiser, C. M., Napier, J., Horne, C. H. W., Lopez, M. J., Shaw‐Dunn, R. I., Sugar, J., Davies, J. D., Day, D. W., & Harlos, J. P.
- Venue
- The Journal of Pathology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1986-11
- Volume
- 150
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 195-203
- ISSN
- 0022-3417 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9896
- OpenAlex
- W1966703018
- Cited by
- 655
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Haematogenous metastastic patterns in colonic carcinoma: An analysis of 1541 necropsies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/path.1711500308
- The paper
- Weiss, L., Grundmann, E., Torhorst, J., Hartveit, F., Moberg, I., Eder, M., Fenoglio‐Preiser, C. M., Napier, J., Horne, C. H. W., Lopez, M. J., Shaw‐Dunn, R. I., Sugar, J., Davies, J. D., Day, D. W., & Harlos, J. P. (1986). Haematogenous metastastic patterns in colonic carcinoma: An analysis of 1541 necropsies. The Journal of Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.1711500308
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.