Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 462

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Metastatic spread in patients with gastric cancer

Open access
Riihimäki, Matias, Hemminki, Akseli, Sundquist, Kristina, Sundquist, Jan, Hemminki, Kari·2016·Oncotarget

Abstract

// Matias Riihimäki 1, 2 , Akseli Hemminki 3, 4 , Kristina Sundquist 2 , Jan Sundquist 2 , Kari Hemminki 1, 2 1 Division of Molecular Genetic Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany 2 Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden 3 Cancer Gene Therapy Group, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Finland 4 Helsinki University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki, Finland Correspondence to: Matias Riihimäki, email: matias.riihimaki@gmail.com Keywords: gastric cancer, metastasis, epidemiology Received: December 22, 2015 Accepted: June 16, 2016 Published: July 20, 2016 ABSTRACT Background: The epidemiology of metastatic gastric cancer is unexplored because cancer registries seldom cover metastatic involvement apart from “present or not”. We used a novel approach by utilizing Swedish registers to assess metastatic spread in gastric cancer. To our knowledge, this is the first nationwide description of metastases in gastric cancer. Results: The most common sites of metastasis were liver (in 48% of metastatic cancer patients), peritoneum (32%), lung (15%), and bone (12%). Metastases to the lung, nervous system, and bone were more frequent in cardia cancer and men, whereas non-cardia cancer more frequently metastasized within the peritoneum. Signet ring adenocarcinomas more frequently metastasized within the peritoneum, bone and ovaries, and less frequently to the lungs and liver compared with generic adenocarcinoma. The liver and the peritoneum were commonly single metastases while lung metastases occurred frequently together with liver metastases. The median survival in metastatic gastric cancer was 3 months, worst among those with bone and liver metastases (2 months). Methods: A total of 7,559 patients with gastric cancer were identified. Metastatic patterns and survival depending on sex, age, stage, anatomical location (cardia and non-cardia), and histological type were assessed. Conclusions: The patterns of metastasis differ notably depending on histological type. Cardia cancer exhibits a completely different metastatic behavior than non-cardia cancer. Awareness of the differing patterns may guide in tailored diagnosis of metastases. Survivors from cardia cancer would benefit from increased surveillance of extraperitoneal metastases. Bone metastases should be considered in patients with signet ring adenocarcinoma if symptoms emerge.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18632/oncotarget.10740

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Cited by

See all 462

Metadata

Authors
Riihimäki, M., Hemminki, A., Sundquist, K., Sundquist, J., & Hemminki, K.
Venue
Oncotarget
Published
2016-07-20
Volume
7
Issue
32
Pages
52307-52316
ISSN
1949-2553 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2497266011
Cited by
462
References
26
FWCI
13.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metastatic spread in patients with gastric cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.18632/oncotarget.10740
The paper
Riihimäki, M., Hemminki, A., Sundquist, K., Sundquist, J., & Hemminki, K. (2016). Metastatic spread in patients with gastric cancer. Oncotarget. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.10740

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.