The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In situ end‐labelling detects DNA strand breaks in apoptosis and other physiological and pathological states
Abstract
We have investigated the use of a novel technique, in situ end‐labelling, as a means of the specific identification of apoptotic cells in formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐processed tissue sections. The technique relies on the presence of DNA strand breaks in apoptotic cells, caused by activation of endogenous nuclease activity during the process of cell death. These strands are labelled with a non‐isotopic reporter molecule in the presence of a DNA polymerase, and labelled DNA is identified immunohistochemically. We show that in situ end‐labelling stains cells with the morphological characteristics of apoptosis, and greatly simplifies their identification. Furthermore, in two model systems, the number of labelled cells parallels the number of cells undergoing apoptosis as measured by alternative techniques. The ability of the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase to label apoptotic nuclei suggests that the characteristic DNA fragmentation seen during this process involves the formation of DNA breaks with a 5′ overhang. in situ end‐labelling will be valuable for the identification and quantitation of apoptosis in a range of normal tissues and in a variety of pathological states. However, the technique is not specific for programmed cell death, and results must be interpreted with caution and correlated with morphological criteria of apoptosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Weintraub, H., & Groudine, M. (1976) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.948749 · Cited by 1,809
Cited by
Functional food science and gastrointestinal physiology and function
Salminen, S., Bouley, C., Boutron, M.-C., Cummings, J. H., Franck, A., Gibson, G. R., Isolauri, E., Moreau, M.-C., Roberfroid, M., & Rowland, I. (1998) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn19980108 · Cited by 1,398
Cui, W., Fowlis, D. J., Bryson, S., Duffie, E., Ireland, H., Balmain, A., & Akhurst, R. J. (1996) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80127-0 · Cited by 628
Lane, N. E., Yao, W., Balooch, M., Nalla, R. K., Balooch, G., Habelitz, S., Kinney, J. H., & Bonewald, L. F. (2006) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1359/jbmr.051103 · Cited by 355
The Neuropathology of Septic Shock
Sharshar, T., Annane, D., de la Gradmaison, G. L., Brouland, J. P., Hopkinson, N. S., & Gray, F. (2004) · Brain Pathology · doi:10.1111/j.1750-3639.2004.tb00494.x · Cited by 348
An overview of apoptosis assays detecting DNA fragmentation
Majtnerová, P., & Roušar, T. (2018) · Molecular Biology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11033-018-4258-9 · Cited by 330
Metadata
- Authors
- Ansari, B., Coates, P. J., Greenstein, B. D., & Hall, P. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Pathology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-05
- Volume
- 170
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-8
- ISSN
- 0022-3417 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9896
- OpenAlex
- W2058789249
- Cited by
- 577
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In situ end‐labelling detects DNA strand breaks in apoptosis and other physiological and pathological states. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/path.1711700102
- The paper
- Ansari, B., Coates, P. J., Greenstein, B. D., & Hall, P. A. (1993). In situ end‐labelling detects DNA strand breaks in apoptosis and other physiological and pathological states. The Journal of Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.1711700102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.