Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 224

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neuropilins in physiological and pathological angiogenesis

Open access
Staton, CA, Kumar, I, Reed, MWR, Brown, NJ·2007·The Journal of Pathology

Abstract

Neuropilin‐1 (Np1) and neuropilin‐2 (Np2) are transmembrane glycoproteins with large extracellular domains that interact with both class 3 semaphorins and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and are involved in the regulation of many physiological pathways, including angiogenesis. The neuropilins also interact directly with the classical receptors for VEGF, VEGF‐R1 and ‐R2, mediating signal transduction. The heart, glomeruli and osteoblasts express both Np1 and Np2, but there is differential expression in the adult vasculature, with Np1 expressed mainly by arterial endothelium, whereas Np2 is only expressed by venous and lymphatic endothelium. Both neuropilins are commonly over‐expressed in regions of physiological (wound‐healing) and pathological (tumour) angiogenesis, but the signal transduction pathways, neuropilin‐mediated gene expression and the definitive role of neuropilins in angiogenic processes are not fully characterized. This review details the current evidence for the role of neuropilins in angiogenesis, and suggests future research directions that may enhance our understanding of the mechanisms of action of this unique family of proteins. Copyright © 2007 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/path.2182

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 224

Metadata

Authors
Staton, C., Kumar, I., Reed, M., & Brown, N.
Venue
The Journal of Pathology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-05-14
Volume
212
Issue
3
Pages
237-248
ISSN
  • 0022-3417 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9896
OpenAlex
W2014608793
Cited by
224
References
3
FWCI
5.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.