The DOI matches its Crossref record.
One virus, one lesion—individual components of CIN lesions contain a specific HPV type
Abstract
In 20–40% of cervical intra‐epithelial neoplasia (CIN) and in 4–8% of cervical carcinoma tissue specimens, multiple HPV genotypes have been detected. Whole tissue section (WTS) PCR does not determine how the individual types relate causally to complex and multiple CIN. Our objective was to determine whether laser capture micro‐dissection (LCM) with HPV PCR genotyping (LCM‐PCR) could accurately recover type‐specific HPV DNA from epithelial cells in individual areas of CIN and normal epithelium, and whether one or more viruses are present in one lesion. For that, histologically selected samples of CIN and normal epithelium were isolated by LCM and analysed by the SPF 10 PCR/LiPA 25 (version 1) HPV genotyping system for 25 HPV genotypes. HPV genotypes detected in 756 areas of CIN (grade 1, 2 or 3) by LCM‐PCR were compared with results obtained by WTS‐PCR in 60 cases (74 biopsies). We showed that when a single HPV type is detected by WTS‐PCR, that type was almost always (94%; 29/31) recovered by LCM‐PCR from CIN. When multiple HPV types were present by WTS‐PCR, their distribution within histological sections could be mapped by LCM‐PCR. Association of a single HPV type with a discrete area of CIN was found for 93% (372/399) of LCM fragments analysed by PCR. We found colliding CIN lesions associated with separate HPV types and only 62% (61/99) of HPV types detected by WTS‐PCR were found in CIN by LCM‐PCR. Therefore, the LCM‐PCR technique was found very accurate for high‐resolution HPV genotyping and for assigning an individual HPV type to an area of CIN. At LCM level, in cervical biopsy sections with multiple HPV infections, the relation between HPV types and CIN lesions is often complex. Almost every HPV type found in CIN by LCM‐PCR is associated with a biological separate independent CIN lesion—one virus, one lesion. Copyright © 2012 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Biology and Life-Cycle of Human Papillomaviruses
Doorbar, J., Quint, W., Banks, L., Bravo, I. G., Stoler, M., Broker, T. R., & Stanley, M. A. (2012) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.06.083 · Cited by 1,528
Self-citationWei, F., Georges, D., Man, I., Baussano, I., & Clifford, G. M. (2024) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(24)01097-3 · Cited by 317
Role of Human Papillomavirus in Penile Carcinomas Worldwide
Alemany, L., Cubilla, A., Halec, G., Kasamatsu, E., Quirós, B., Masferrer, E., Tous, S., Lloveras, B., Hernández-Suarez, G., Lonsdale, R., et al. (2016) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.007 · Cited by 299
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Quint, W., Jenkins, D., Molijn, A., Struijk, L., van de Sandt, M., Doorbar, J., Mols, J., Van Hoof, C., Hardt, K., Struyf, F., & Colau, B.
- Venue
- The Journal of Pathology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-02-17
- Volume
- 227
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 62-71
- ISSN
- 0022-3417 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9896
- OpenAlex
- W2155071719
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.