The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High frequency of BRAFV600E mutations in ameloblastoma
Open accessAbstract
Ameloblastoma is a benign but locally infiltrative odontogenic neoplasm. Although ameloblastomas rarely metastasise, recurrences together with radical surgery often result in facial deformity and significant morbidity. Development of non‐invasive therapies has been precluded by a lack of understanding of the molecular background of ameloblastoma pathogenesis. When addressing the role of ERBB receptors as potential new targets for ameloblastoma, we discovered significant EGFR over‐expression in clinical samples using real‐time RT–PCR, but observed variable sensitivity of novel primary ameloblastoma cells to EGFR‐targeted drugs in vitro. In the quest for mutations downstream of EGFR that could explain this apparent discrepancy, Sanger sequencing revealed an oncogenic BRAF V600E mutation in the cell line resistant to EGFR inhibition. Further analysis of the clinical samples by Sanger sequencing and BRAF V600E‐specific immunohistochemistry demonstrated a high frequency of BRAF V600E mutations (15 of 24 samples, 63%). These data provide novel insight into the poorly understood molecular pathogenesis of ameloblastoma and offer a rationale to test drugs targeting EGFR or mutant BRAF as novel therapies for ameloblastoma. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. www.pathsoc.org.uk
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lynch, T. J., Bell, D. W., Sordella, R., Gurubhagavatula, S., Okimoto, R. A., Brannigan, B. W., Harris, P. L., Haserlat, S. M., Supko, J. G., Haluska, F. G., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa040938 · Cited by 11,486
EGFR Mutations in Lung Cancer: Correlation with Clinical Response to Gefitinib Therapy
Paez, J. G., Jänne, P. A., Lee, J. C., Tracy, S., Greulich, H., Gabriel, S., Herman, P., Kaye, F. J., Lindeman, N., Boggon, T. J., et al. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1099314 · Cited by 9,368
Improved survival with vemurafenib in melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation
Chapman, P. B., Hauschild, A., Robert, C., Haanen, J. B., Ascierto, P., Larkin, J., Dummer, R., Garbe, C., Testori, A., Maio, M., et al. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1103782 · Cited by 7,720
Wild-Type KRAS Is Required for Panitumumab Efficacy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Amado, R. G., Wolf, M., Peeters, M., Van Cutsem, E., Siena, S., Freeman, D. J., Juan, T., Sikorski, R., Suggs, S., Radinsky, R., et al. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2007.14.7116 · Cited by 3,207 · cited 1×
“These observations demonstrate that, similar to KRAS mutations in colorectal cancer [12,17,18,20], the BRAF V600E mutation is associated with resistance to EGFR-targeted drugs in ameloblastoma cells.”
BackgroundDe Roock, W., Claes, B., Bernasconi, D., De Schutter, J., Biesmans, B., Fountzilas, G., Kalogeras, K. T., Kotoula, V., Papamichael, D., Laurent-Puig, P., et al. (2010) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70130-3 · Cited by 2,144
Wild-Type BRAF Is Required for Response to Panitumumab or Cetuximab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Di Nicolantonio, F., Martini, M., Molinari, F., Sartore-Bianchi, A., Arena, S., Saletti, P., De Dosso, S., Mazzucchelli, L., Frattini, M., Siena, S., et al. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2008.18.0786 · Cited by 1,591 · cited 1×
“Specific genetic markers predict the response to EGFRtargeted cancer drugs in the clinic and in vitro [12–20].”
BackgroundBenvenuti, S., Sartore-Bianchi, A., Di Nicolantonio, F., Zanon, C., Moroni, M., Veronese, S., Siena, S., & Bardelli, A. (2007) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-4158 · Cited by 830
Cited by
Identification of recurrent SMO and BRAF mutations in ameloblastomas
Sweeney, R. T., McClary, A. C., Myers, B. R., Biscocho, J., Neahring, L., Kwei, K. A., Qu, K., Gong, X., Ng, T., Jones, C. D., et al. (2014) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2986 · Cited by 366
Metadata
- Authors
- Kurppa, K. J., Catón, J., Morgan, P. R., Ristimäki, A., Ruhin, B., Kellokoski, J., Elenius, K., & Heikinheimo, K.
- Venue
- The Journal of Pathology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-01-31
- Volume
- 232
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 492-498
- ISSN
- 0022-3417 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9896
- OpenAlex
- W1524280083
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 15.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
