Cited by 1,591Colorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesLung Cancer Treatments and MutationsColorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments

Wild-Type BRAF Is Required for Response to Panitumumab or Cetuximab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Open access
Di Nicolantonio, Federica, Martini, Miriam, Molinari, Francesca, Sartore-Bianchi, Andrea, Arena, Sabrina, Saletti, Piercarlo, De Dosso, Sara, Mazzucchelli, Luca +3 more·2008·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Cetuximab or panitumumab are effective in 10% to 20% unselected metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. KRAS mutations account for approximately 30% to 40% patients who are not responsive. The serine-threonine kinase BRAF is the principal effector of KRAS. We hypothesized that, in KRAS wild-type patients, BRAF mutations could have a predictive/prognostic value. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed objective tumor responses, time to progression, overall survival (OS), and the mutational status of KRAS and BRAF in 113 tumors from cetuximab- or panitumumab-treated metastatic CRC patients. The effect of the BRAF V600E mutation on cetuximab or panitumumab response was also assessed using cellular models of CRC. Results: KRAS mutations were present in 30% of the patients and were associated with resistance to cetuximab or panitumumab (P = .011). The BRAF V600E mutation was detected in 11 of 79 patients who had wild-type KRAS. None of the BRAF-mutated patients responded to treatment, whereas none of the responders carried BRAF mutations (P = .029). BRAF-mutated patients had significantly shorter progression-free survival (P = .011) and OS (P < .0001) than wild-type patients. In CRC cells, the introduction of BRAF V600E allele impaired the therapeutic effect of cetuximab or panitumumab. Treatment with the BRAF inhibitor sorafenib restored sensitivity to panitumumab or cetuximab of CRC cells carrying the V600E allele. Conclusion: BRAF wild-type is required for response to panitumumab or cetuximab and could be used to select patients who are eligible for the treatment. Double-hit therapies aimed at simultaneous inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor and BRAF warrant exploration in CRC patients carrying the V600E oncogenic mutation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2008.18.0786

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Di Nicolantonio, F., Martini, M., Molinari, F., Sartore-Bianchi, A., Arena, S., Saletti, P., De Dosso, S., Mazzucchelli, L., Frattini, M., Siena, S., & Bardelli, A.
Affiliations
  • From the Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, The Oncogenomics Center, Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment, University of Torino Medical School, Candiolo; The Falck Division of Medical Oncology, Ospedale Niguarda Ca’ Granda; Italian Foundation for Cancer Research–Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy; Laboratory of Molecular Diagnostic, Istituto Cantonale di Patologia, Locarno; and Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ospedale San Giovanni, Bellinzona, Switzerland
  • Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda (IT)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2008-12-10
Volume
26
Issue
35
Pages
5705-5712
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2131413118
Cited by
1,591
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 67 · 2016: 126 · 2015: 108 · 2014: 147 · 2013: 146 · 2012: 148
FWCI
87.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Oncosuisse
  • Regione Piemonte
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Keywords
BRAF wild-type, BRAF V600E mutation, KRAS mutation, cetuximab, panitumumab, metastatic colorectal cancer, EGFR inhibitors, treatment resistance, sorafenib, predictive biomarkers, progression-free survival, overall survival
MeSH terms
Cetuximab, Sorafenib, Panitumumab, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Antineoplastic Agents, Benzenesulfonates, Cell Survival, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Humans, Italy, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Neoplasm Metastasis, Niacinamide, Phenylurea Compounds, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Pyridines, Retrospective Studies, Switzerland, Time Factors, Biomarkers, Tumor, Colorectal Neoplasms, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), Treatment Outcome, Disease-Free Survival, Patient Selection, ras Proteins, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, HT29 Cells, Gene Expression Profiling, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review