Cited by 130Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders ResearchKawasaki Disease and Coronary ComplicationsImmunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders

The role of the initial bone marrow aspirate in the diagnosis of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis

Gupta, Abha, Tyrrell, Pascal, Valani, Rahim, Benseler, Susanne, Weitzman, Sheila, Abdelhaleem, Mohamed·2008·Pediatric Blood & Cancer

Abstract

Background: The identification of hemophagocytosis (HPC) in tissue or bone marrow (BM) represents only one of 5/8 criteria needed for the diagnosis of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH). Yet, confirmation of HPC in bone marrow aspirates (BMA) is often relied upon to make therapeutic decisions. There is no standardized reporting criteria for the definition of “positive” BMA, and likely differs between institutions. The purpose of this study was to quantify the number of HPC in the initial BMA in patients diagnosed with HLH at our institution. Procedure: Patient charts were retrospectively reviewed. Numbers of HPC were counted per 500 nucleated cells in initial BMA. Results: Fifty‐eight percent of patients had at least one HPC per 500 nucleated cells. Median number of HPC per 500 cells was 1 (0–12). Median time from initial BMA to HLH diagnosis was 0 days (−3 to 11), suggesting that HLH diagnosis was made regardless of the results of this initial BMA. Conclusion: The number of HPC at initial BMA is often low and variable, confirming that a BMA lacking HPC does not rule out the diagnosis of HLH, and a negative initial BMA should not delay therapy. We recommend that the BMA report should document negative as well as any positive findings of HPC. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2008;51:402–404. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pbc.21564

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Over 40% of patients with MAS/HLH do not have hemophagocytes in bone marrow aspirates.

    “Although sampling error is always of concern, it has been reported that over 40% of patients with MAS/HLH do not have hemophagocytes in bone marrow aspirates, suggesting a separation of disease initiation from the development of hemophagocytes (23).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gupta, A., Tyrrell, P., Valani, R., Benseler, S., Weitzman, S., & Abdelhaleem, M.
Affiliations
Hospital for Sick Children (CA)
Corresponding author
Gupta, Abha
Venue
Pediatric Blood & Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-06-03
Volume
51
Issue
3
Pages
402-404
ISSN
  • 1545-5009 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-5017
OpenAlex
W2012471701
Cited by
130
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 13
FWCI
2.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pediatric Blood & Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Kawasaki Disease and Coronary Complications
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
Keywords
hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, hemophagocytosis, bone marrow aspirate, diagnostic criteria, reporting criteria, delayed diagnosis, pediatric patients
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Biopsy, Needle, Bone Marrow Examination, Cell Count, Child, Child, Preschool, Diagnostic Errors, Humans, Infant, Retrospective Studies, Observer Variation, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Lymphohistiocytosis, Hemophagocytic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review