Cited by 115Natural Fiber Reinforced CompositesWood Treatment and PropertiesFiber-reinforced polymer composites

Mechanical properties of wood plastic composite panels made from waste fiberboard and particleboard

Chaharmahali, Majid, Tajvidi, Mehdi, Najafi, Saeed Kazemi·2008·Polymer Composites

Abstract

The possibility of producing wood‐plastic panels using a melt blend/hot press method was studied in this research. The studied panels were compared with conventional medium density fiberboard (MDF) and particleboard (PB) panels. Wood‐plastic panels were made from high density polyethylene (as resin) and MDF waste and PB waste (as natural fiber) at 60, 70, and 80% by weight fiber loadings. Nominal density and dimensions of the panels were 1 g/cm 3 and 35 × 35 × 1 cm 3, respectively. Mechanical properties of the panels including flexural modulus, flexural strength, screw and nail withdrawal resistances, and impact strength were studied. Results indicated that the mechanical properties of the composites were strongly affected by the proportion of the wood flour and polymer. Maximum values of flexural modulus of wood plastic panels were reached at 70% fiber content. Flexural strength, screw and nail withdrawal resistance, and impact strength of wood plastic composites declined with the increase in fiber content from 60 to 80%. This was attributed to the lack of compatibility between the phases. The produced panels outperformed conventional PB panels regarding their mechanical properties, which were acceptable when compared with MDF panels as well. The best feature in the produced panels was their screw withdrawal resistance, which is extremely important for screw joints in cabinet making. POLYM. COMPOS., 2008. © 2008 Society of Plastics Engineers

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pc.20434

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chaharmahali, M., Tajvidi, M., & Najafi, S. K.
Affiliations
  • Tarbiat Modares University (IR)
  • University of Tehran (IR)
Corresponding author
Tajvidi, Mehdi
Venue
Polymer Composites
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-03-17
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
606-610
ISSN
  • 0272-8397 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-0569
OpenAlex
W2019409392
Cited by
115
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Polymer Composites (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Wood Treatment and Properties
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Fiber-reinforced polymer composites
Keywords
wood-plastic composites, particleboard, high-density polyethylene, flexural modulus, flexural strength, screw withdrawal strength, impact strength, fiber loading, phase compatibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review