Cited by 0biodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesNatural Fiber Reinforced CompositesPolymer crystallization and properties

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Grape Pomace as a Biofiller in PLA ‐ and PBAT ‐Based Composites: Effects on Processing, Properties, and Compost Disintegration

Open access

Abstract

Biocomposites offer a key solution for managing food waste and replacing non‐biodegradable plastics. In this study, grape pomace (GP) was incorporated at 10 and 20 wt.% into poly(butylene adipate‐co‐butylene terephthalate) (PBAT) and polylactide (PLA) through melt compounding to investigate the effect of the filler on different properties. The influence of GP on morphology, mechanical, thermal, and rheological properties was evaluated. The results revealed a strongly matrix‐dependent effect of GP. GP has opposite effects on viscosity: it increases in PBAT‐based composite (especially at 20% loading), but reduces it in PLA‐based ones. SEC analyses showed a progressive decrease in PLA molecular weight from Mw about 245,000 g mol −1 for neat PLA to ~147,000 g mol −1 for PLA/GP20, while only limited variations were observed for PBAT‐based samples. For both matrices, GP enhanced stiffness while reducing tensile strength and elongation at break. The comparative performance assessment provided the appropriate information for selecting the PBAT‐based biocomposite as the most suitable formulation for further degradation testing in compost. Degradation tests in compost (58°C, 90 days) demonstrate that GP accelerates disintegration kinetics with PBAT‐based biocomposites showing significantly higher weight loss and surface deterioration than neat PBAT. Grape pomace promotes microbial colonization and enzyme activity, specifically driven by Streptomyces thermoviolaceus and Bradyrhizobium elkanii , which accelerates PBAT depolymerization. Overall, GP effects depend on the polymer: it worsens PLA chain degradation during processing, whereas in PBAT it preserves molecular integrity while accelerating composting disintegration. Further studies measuring CO 2 and O 2 are needed to confirm ultimate biodegradation and mineralization.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pc.71756

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. 10.3390/polym13010158 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.mtsust.2025.101220 · DOI
  3. 10.1177/07316844211070609 · DOI
  4. 10.3390/polym18010022 · DOI
  5. 10.1039/d5gc01294e · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.coco.2025.102597 · DOI
  7. 10.1002/pc.29589 · DOI
  8. 10.1007/s12649‐024‐02856‐y · DOI
  9. 10.1186/s44147‐025‐00862‐y · DOI
  10. 10.3390/polym16223172 · DOI
  11. 10.1002/pc.29742 · DOI
  12. 10.3390/polym13030381 · DOI
  13. 10.1021/acsomega.8b01675 · DOI
  14. 10.1002/app.49061 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.afres.2026.101776 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/app.54425 · DOI
  17. 10.1002/app.32961 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2024.111091 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2025.111551 · DOI
  20. 10.1007/s10924‐024‐03456‐6 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.03.022 · DOI
  22. 10.1002/PC.28439 · DOI
  23. 10.3390/nano12132275 · DOI
  24. 10.3390/polym16030411 · DOI
  25. Rizzarelli P., 2026, Comprehensive Polymer Science, 243, 10.1016/B978-0-323-95486-0.00079-X · DOI
  26. 10.3390/ijms21217857 · DOI
  27. 10.1007/s00253‐010‐2555‐x · DOI
  28. 10.1186/2191‐0855‐3‐8 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.142696 · DOI
  30. 10.1007/s00253‐025‐13565‐4 · DOI
  31. 10.1038/s41598‐020‐62198‐2 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.137155 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Leanza, M., Botta, L., Indovino, E., Titone, V., Melilli, D., Abbate, C., Faulisi, M. V., Restuccia, C., Scarfato, P., Rizzarelli, P., & Mistretta, M. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Catania (IT)
  • National Interuniversity Consortium of Materials Science and Technology (IT)
  • University of Salerno (IT)
Corresponding author
  • Rizzarelli, Paola
  • Mistretta, Maria Chiara
Venue
Polymer Composites
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2026-11-03
ISSN
  • 0272-8397 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-0569
OpenAlex
W7225228210
Cited by
0
References
25
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Polymer Composites (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
Keywords
grape pomace, biocomposites, polylactic acid, poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate), bio-based fillers, food waste valorization, melt blending, mechanical properties, rheology, molecular weight degradation, depolymerization, Streptomyces thermoviolaceus, Bradyrhizobium elkanii, biodegradable plastics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review