Cited by 11Neuroscience and Music PerceptionNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Setting the beat of an internal clock: Effects of dexamphetamine on different interval ranges of temporal processing in healthy volunteers

Graham‐Schmidt, Kyran T., Martin‐Iverson, Mathew T., Waters, Flavie A.V.·2019·PsyCh Journal

Abstract

Drug studies are powerful models to investigate the neuropharmacological mechanisms underlying temporal processing in humans. This study administered dexamphetamine to 24 healthy volunteers to investigate time perception at different time scales, along with contributions from working memory. Healthy volunteers were administered 0.45 mg/kg dexamphetamine or placebo in a double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled design. Time perception was assessed using three experimental tasks: a time-discrimination task, which asked participants to determine whether a comparison interval (1200 ± 0, 50, 100, 150, 200 ms) was shorter or longer than a standard interval (1200 ms); a retrospective time estimation task, which required participants to verbally estimate time intervals (10, 30, 60, 90 and 120 s) retrospectively; and a prospective time-production task, where participants were required to prospectively monitor the passing of time (10, 30, 60, 90 and 120 s). Working memory was assessed with the backwards digit span. On the discrimination task, there was a change in the proportion of long-to-short responses and reaction times in the dexamphetamine condition (but no association with working memory), consistent with an increase in the speed of an internal pacemaker, and an overestimation of durations in the timing of shorter intervals. There was an interaction between dexamphetamine, working memory, and performance on the estimation and production tasks, whereby increasing digit span sco…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pchj.274

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Graham‐Schmidt, K. T., Martin‐Iverson, M. T., & Waters, F. A. V.
Affiliations
  • Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Pharmacology University of Western Australia Perth Western Australia Australia
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
Venue
PsyCh Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-02-21
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
90-109
ISSN
  • 2046-0252 (ISSN-L)
  • 2046-0260
OpenAlex
W2917389288
Cited by
11
References
9
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PsyCh Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Health and Medical Research Council (403994)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
d-amphetamine, time perception, temporal processing, working memory, dopamine, temporal discrimination, retrospective time estimation, interval timing, healthy volunteers
MeSH terms
Adult, Dextroamphetamine, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Time Perception, Cross-Over Studies, Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review