Cited by 61Prenatal Screening and DiagnosticsCraniofacial Disorders and TreatmentsCongenital limb and hand anomalies

Diagnosis of Apert syndrome in the second‐trimester using 2D and 3D ultrasound

Open access
David, A. L., Turnbull, C., Scott, R., Freeman, J., Bilardo, C. M., van Maarle, M., Chitty, L. S.·2007·Prenatal Diagnosis

Abstract

Objectives: To illustrate how Apert syndrome, a rare autosomal dominant genetic syndrome, can be detected in the second‐trimester of pregnancy using 2D ultrasound, and how 3D ultrasound examination may provide parents with a better understanding of the structural defects affecting their baby. Methods: Fetal Medicine Unit database searches to identify Apert syndrome cases. Results: Five cases of Apert syndrome were suspected in the second‐trimester when sonography showed abnormal extremities including syndactyly, and an abnormal skull shape. In 1 case there was increased nuchal translucency with a normal fetal karyotype in the first‐trimester. In all cases, a mutation of the FGFR2 gene confirmed the diagnosis of Apert syndrome. 3D ultrasound was used to show parents the extent of the abnormalities of the skull, face and extremities. Parents were counseled by craniofacial surgeons and geneticists. Conclusion: Apert syndrome can be accurately suspected in the second‐trimester by careful ultrasound examination of the fetus including the extremities and skull shape. 3D ultrasound can be a useful adjunct to 2D examination for parental counseling. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pd.1758

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A small number of reports describe ultrasound detection of craniosynostosis at about 20 weeks.

    “Although there have been a few reports of ultrasound diagnosis of craniosynostosis around this time, 47”

    From Craniosynostosis (2011) · cites this paper as [47]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
David, A. L., Turnbull, C., Scott, R., Freeman, J., Bilardo, C. M., van Maarle, M., & Chitty, L. S.
Affiliations
  • University College Hospital (GB)
  • Great Ormond Street Hospital (GB)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
David, A. L.
Venue
Prenatal Diagnosis
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-05-14
Volume
27
Issue
7
Pages
629-632
ISSN
  • 0197-3851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0223
OpenAlex
W1994906556
Cited by
61
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Prenatal Diagnosis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Congenital limb and hand anomalies
Keywords
Apert syndrome, second trimester prenatal diagnosis, 3D ultrasound, two-dimensional ultrasound, syndactyly, craniosynostosis, FGFR2 mutations, increased nuchal translucency, parental counseling
MeSH terms
Acrocephalosyndactylia, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, Second, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Imaging, Three-Dimensional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review