The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Detection of fetal structural abnormalities at the 11–14 week ultrasound scan
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the detection of fetal structural abnormalities by the 11–14 week scan. 2853 pregnant women were submitted to a routine ultrasound scan between the 11th and 14th week and the fetal skull, brain, spine, abdominal wall, limbs, stomach and bladder were examined. Following the scans the patientes were examined in the second or third trimester of pregnancy. An isolated increased nuchal translucency was not considered an abnormality. However, these patients had an early echocardiography assessment. Fetal structural abnormalities were classified as major or minor and of early or late onset. A total of 130 (4.6%) defects were identified and 29 (22.3%) of these were diagnosed at the 11–14 week scan, including nine cardiac defects associated with increased nuchal translucency. The antenatal ultrasound detection rate was 71.5%, and 31.2% were detected in the first‐trimester assessment. 78.8% of the major defects were diagnosed by the prenatal scan and 37.8% by the 11–14 week scan. Fetal structural abnormalities at the 11–14 week scan were detected in approximately 22.3% of the cases, therefore, a second‐trimester anomaly scan is important in routine antenatal care to increase the prenatal detection of fetal defects. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal blood in screening for aneuploidies: Updated meta-analysis
Gil, M. M., Accurti, V., Santacruz, B., Plana, M. N., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2017) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.17484 · Cited by 683
Challenges in the diagnosis of fetal non‐chromosomal abnormalities at 11–13 weeks
Syngelaki, A., Chelemen, T., Dagklis, T., Allan, L., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2011) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.2642 · Cited by 498
Benn, P., Borrell, A., Chiu, R. W. K., Cuckle, H., Dugoff, L., Faas, B., Gross, S., Huang, T., Johnson, J., Maymon, R., et al. (2015) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.4608 · Cited by 292
Karim, J. N., Roberts, N. W., Salomon, L. J., & Papageorghiou, A. T. (2017) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.17246 · Cited by 266
Revisiting first-trimester fetal biometry
Salomon, L. J., Bernard, J. P., Duyme, M., Dorion, A., & Ville, Y. (2003) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.162 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Carvalho, M. H. B., Brizot, M. L., Lopes, L. M., Chiba, C. H., Miyadahira, S., & Zugaib, M.
- Venue
- Prenatal Diagnosis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-4
- ISSN
- 0197-3851 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0223
- OpenAlex
- W2042531256
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection of fetal structural abnormalities at the 11–14 week ultrasound scan. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pd.200
- The paper
- Carvalho, M. H. B., Brizot, M. L., Lopes, L. M., Chiba, C. H., Miyadahira, S., & Zugaib, M. (2002). Detection of fetal structural abnormalities at the 11–14 week ultrasound scan. Prenatal Diagnosis. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.200
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.