Reproducibility study of crown-rump length and biparietal diameter measurements in the first trimester
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to investigate the intra‐observer and inter‐observer variability of crown–rump length (CRL) and biparietal diameter (BPD) measurements in the first trimester. Methods: A prospective observational study on 592 fetuses between 8 and 14 gestational weeks was conducted. Intra‐class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were computed, and Bland–Altman analysis was carried out. Results: The ICCs (95% confidence interval) and the 95% limits of agreement, expressed as a percentage of the average, for CRL's intra‐observer and inter‐observer variability were 0.979 (0.974–0.982, p < 0.001), +8.53% to −8.376%, and 0.968 (0.952–0.978, p < 0.001), +9.06% to −7.69%, respectively. The corresponding figures for BPD were 0.981 (0.977–0.984, p < 0.001), +7.41% to −7.51%, and 0.968 (0.952–0.978, p < 0.001), +6.65% to −7.25%. After conversion in days, the ICCs and 95% limits of agreement for CRL's intra‐observer and inter‐observer variability were 0.983 (0.980–0.986, p < 0.001), +2.88% to −2.84%, and 0.971 (0.957–0.980, p < 0.001), 2.83% to −2.60%, respectively. The corresponding figures for BPD were 0.982 (0.979–0.986, p < 0.001), +3.36% to −3.40%, and 0.968 (0.953–0.978, p < 0.001), +3.06% to −3.38%. CRL's standard deviation of the differences increased with gestation for intra‐observer (r = 0.289, p < 0.001) and inter‐observer (r = 0.197, p = 0.023) variability. Conclusion: The BPD and CRL are highly reproducible measurements. CRL's measurement error increased with the magnitude of CRL, whereas BPD's reproducibility was not affected by gestational age. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
With advancing gestation, the inter-observer variability in crown-rump length increased from +1.42 to −2.15 at 55 mm to +3.12 to −2.36 at 80 mm.
“This is justified by a prospective study that showed that with advancing gestation the inter-observer variability in the CRL increased from +1.42 to −2.15 at 55 mm to +3.12 to −2.36 at 80 mm [23].”
From First-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines (2026) · cites this paper as [23]
Crown-rump length is a reliable method only when it measures between 45 and 84 mm.
“Of note, the CRL is a reliable method only when it measures between 45 and 84 mm.”
From First-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines (2026) · cites this paper as [23]
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965 · see citing works
Predicting delivery date by ultrasound and last menstrual period in early gestation
Taipale, P. (2001) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01131-5 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
First-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines
Boureka, E., Tsakiridis, I., Michos, G., Liberis, A., Giouleka, S., Mamopoulos, A., Kalogiannidis, I., & Dagklis, T. (2026) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics16111695
- Authors
- Souka, A. P., Pilalis, A., Papastefanou, I., Salamalekis, G., & Kassanos, D.
- Affiliations
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
- Corresponding author
- Souka, Athena P.
- Venue
- Prenatal Diagnosis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-10-03
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1158-1165
- ISSN
- 0197-3851 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0223
- OpenAlex
- W1837528702
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Prenatal Diagnosis (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
- Keywords
- reproducibility, crown-rump length, biparietal diameter, first trimester, prenatal ultrasound, intraobserver variability, interobserver variability, measurement agreement, gestational age estimation, fetal biometry, gestational sac, yolk sac, fetal heart rate
- MeSH terms
- Cephalometry, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Reference Values, Reproducibility of Results, Observer Variation, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Crown-Rump Length
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review