Cited by 21Reliability and Agreement in MeasurementPrenatal Screening and DiagnosticsPregnancy and preeclampsia studies

Reproducibility study of crown-rump length and biparietal diameter measurements in the first trimester

Souka, Athena P., Pilalis, Athanasios, Papastefanou, Ioannis, Salamalekis, George, Kassanos, Dimitrios·2012·Prenatal Diagnosis

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to investigate the intra‐observer and inter‐observer variability of crown–rump length (CRL) and biparietal diameter (BPD) measurements in the first trimester. Methods: A prospective observational study on 592 fetuses between 8 and 14 gestational weeks was conducted. Intra‐class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were computed, and Bland–Altman analysis was carried out. Results: The ICCs (95% confidence interval) and the 95% limits of agreement, expressed as a percentage of the average, for CRL's intra‐observer and inter‐observer variability were 0.979 (0.974–0.982, p < 0.001), +8.53% to −8.376%, and 0.968 (0.952–0.978, p < 0.001), +9.06% to −7.69%, respectively. The corresponding figures for BPD were 0.981 (0.977–0.984, p < 0.001), +7.41% to −7.51%, and 0.968 (0.952–0.978, p < 0.001), +6.65% to −7.25%. After conversion in days, the ICCs and 95% limits of agreement for CRL's intra‐observer and inter‐observer variability were 0.983 (0.980–0.986, p < 0.001), +2.88% to −2.84%, and 0.971 (0.957–0.980, p < 0.001), 2.83% to −2.60%, respectively. The corresponding figures for BPD were 0.982 (0.979–0.986, p < 0.001), +3.36% to −3.40%, and 0.968 (0.953–0.978, p < 0.001), +3.06% to −3.38%. CRL's standard deviation of the differences increased with gestation for intra‐observer (r = 0.289, p < 0.001) and inter‐observer (r = 0.197, p = 0.023) variability. Conclusion: The BPD and CRL are highly reproducible measurements. CRL's measurement error increased with the magnitude of CRL, whereas BPD's reproducibility was not affected by gestational age. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pd.3976

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • With advancing gestation, the inter-observer variability in crown-rump length increased from +1.42 to −2.15 at 55 mm to +3.12 to −2.36 at 80 mm.

    “This is justified by a prospective study that showed that with advancing gestation the inter-observer variability in the CRL increased from +1.42 to −2.15 at 55 mm to +3.12 to −2.36 at 80 mm [23].”
  • Crown-rump length is a reliable method only when it measures between 45 and 84 mm.

    “Of note, the CRL is a reliable method only when it measures between 45 and 84 mm.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Souka, A. P., Pilalis, A., Papastefanou, I., Salamalekis, G., & Kassanos, D.
Affiliations
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
Corresponding author
Souka, Athena P.
Venue
Prenatal Diagnosis
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-10-03
Volume
32
Issue
12
Pages
1158-1165
ISSN
  • 0197-3851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0223
OpenAlex
W1837528702
Cited by
21
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Prenatal Diagnosis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Keywords
reproducibility, crown-rump length, biparietal diameter, first trimester, prenatal ultrasound, intraobserver variability, interobserver variability, measurement agreement, gestational age estimation, fetal biometry, gestational sac, yolk sac, fetal heart rate
MeSH terms
Cephalometry, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Reference Values, Reproducibility of Results, Observer Variation, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Crown-Rump Length

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review