Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 230

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical application of massively parallel sequencing‐based prenatal noninvasive fetal trisomy test for trisomies 21 and 18 in 11 105 pregnancies with mixed risk factors

Open access
Dan, Shan, Wang, Wei, Ren, Jinghui, Li, Yali, Hu, Hua, Xu, Zhengfeng, Lau, Tze Kin, Xie, Jianhong, Zhao, Weihua, Huang, Hefeng, Xie, Jiansheng, Sun, Luming, Zhang, Xiaohong, Wang, Weipeng, Liao, Shixiu, Qiang, Rong, Cao, Jiangxia, Zhang, Qiufang, Zhou, Yulin, Zhu, Haiyan, Zhong, Mei, Guo, Yi, Lin, Linhua, Gao, Zhiying, Yao, Hong, Zhang, Hongyun, Zhao, Lijian, Jiang, Fuman, Chen, Fang, Jiang, Hui, Li, Songgang, Li, Yingrui, Wang, Jun, Wang, Jian, Duan, Tao, Su, Yue, Zhang, Xiuqing·2012·Prenatal Diagnosis

Abstract

Objective: To report the performance of massively parallel sequencing (MPS) based prenatal noninvasive fetal trisomy test based on cell‐free DNA sequencing from maternal plasma in a routine clinical setting in China. Method: The MPS‐based test was offered as a prenatal screening test for trisomies 21 and 18 to pregnant women in 49 medical centers over 2 years. A total of 11 263 participants were recruited and the MPS‐based test was performed in 11 105 pregnancies. Fetal outcome data were obtained after the expected date of confinement. Results: One hundred ninety cases were classified as positive, including 143 cases of trisomy 21 and 47 cases of trisomy 18. With the karyotyping results and the feedback of fetal outcome data, we observed one false positive case of trisomy 21, one false positive case of trisomy 18 and no false negative cases, indicating 100% sensitivity and 99.96% specificity for the detection of trisomies 21 and 18. Conclusion: Our large‐scale multicenter study proved that the MPS‐based test is of high sensitivity and specificity in detecting fetal trisomies 21 and 18. The introduction of this screening test into a routine clinical setting could avoid about 98% of invasive prenatal diagnostic procedures. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pd.4002

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 230

Metadata

Authors
Dan, S., Wang, W., Ren, J., Li, Y., Hu, H., Xu, Z., Lau, T. K., Xie, J., Zhao, W., Huang, H., Xie, J., Sun, L., Zhang, X., Wang, W., Liao, S., Qiang, R., Cao, J., Zhang, Q., Zhou, Y., Zhu, H., Zhong, M., Guo, Y., Lin, L., Gao, Z., Yao, H., Zhang, H., Zhao, L., Jiang, F., Chen, F., Jiang, H., Li, S., Li, Y., Wang, J., Wang, J., Duan, T., Su, Y., & Zhang, X.
Venue
Prenatal Diagnosis
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-11-09
Volume
32
Issue
13
Pages
1225-1232
ISSN
  • 0197-3851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0223
OpenAlex
W2108641027
Cited by
230
References
1
FWCI
33.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical application of massively parallel sequencing‐based prenatal noninvasive fetal trisomy test for trisomies 21 and 18 in 11 105 pregnancies with mixed risk factors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pd.4002
The paper
Dan, S., Wang, W., Ren, J., Li, Y., Hu, H., Xu, Z., Lau, T. K., Xie, J., Zhao, W., Huang, H., Xie, J., Sun, L., Zhang, X., Wang, W., Liao, S., Qiang, R., Cao, J., Zhang, Q., Zhou, Y., . . . Zhang, X. (2012). Clinical application of massively parallel sequencing‐based prenatal noninvasive fetal trisomy test for trisomies 21 and 18 in 11 105 pregnancies with mixed risk factors. Prenatal Diagnosis. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.4002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.