Pregnancy continuation and organizational religious activity following prenatal diagnosis of a lethal fetal defect are associated with improved psychological outcome: Psychological outcome following prenatal diagnosis of a lethal fetal defect
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the article is to examine the psychological impact, specifically symptoms of grief, post-traumatic stress and depression, in women and men who either terminated or continued a pregnancy following prenatal diagnosis of a lethal fetal defect. METHOD: This project investigated a diagnostically homogeneous group composed of 158 women and 109 men who lost a pregnancy to anencephaly, a lethal neural tube defect. Participants completed the Perinatal Grief Scale, Impact of Event Scale - Revised and Beck Depression Inventory-II, which measure symptoms of grief, post-traumatic stress and depression, respectively. Demographics, religiosity and pregnancy choices were also collected. Gender-specific analysis of variance was performed for instrument total scores and subscales. RESULTS: Women who terminated reported significantly more despair (p = 0.02), avoidance (p = 0.008) and depression (p = 0.04) than women who continued the pregnancy. Organizational religious activity was associated with a reduction in grief (Perinatal Grief Scale subscales) in both women (p = 0.02, p = 0.04 and p = 0.03) and men (p = 0.047). CONCLUSION: There appears to be a psychological benefit to women to continue the pregnancy following a lethal fetal diagnosis. Following a lethal fetal diagnosis, the risks and benefits, including psychological effects, of termination and continuation of pregnancy should be discussed in detail with an effort to be as nondirective as possible.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Quantitative studies comparing heterosexual couples' experiences following pregnancy loss and neonatal death suggest that men typically experience less intense and enduring levels of grief than women.
“For example, quantitative studies comparing heterosexual couples’ experiences following pregnancy loss and neonatal death suggest that men typically experience less intense and enduring levels of grief than women [18–23].”
From Factors contributing to men’s grief following pregnancy loss and neonatal death: further development of an emerging model in an Australian sample (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
The Introduction (page unavailable) says that a few quantitative studies of pregnancy loss due to fetal anomalies suggest men experience grief to a lesser degree and perhaps for a shorter period. The Results and Discussion (page unavailable) also report greater distress among women in this study of losses involving anencephaly. The source supports the suggested gender pattern, but its evidence is limited to lethal fetal defects rather than pregnancy loss and neonatal death generally. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredWith the exception of one study which employed author-developed measures of grief and support service satisfaction, the remaining quantitative studies employed standardised and validated measures for both predictors and grief.
“With the exception of one study which employed author-developed measures of grief and support service satisfaction [70] the remaining quantitative studies employed standardised and validated measures for both predictors and grief [23–25, 67, 76, 84, 86–96].”
From Men’s grief following pregnancy loss and neonatal loss: a systematic review and emerging theoretical model (2020) · cites this paper as [67]
The Methods > Measures section says participants completed standardized instruments, including the Perinatal Grief Scale, and used items from the Duke University Religion Index to assess religious activity. But pregnancy management choices were collected with the Pregnancy History and Choices Questionnaires, which the authors say were developed specifically for this project; the claim that predictors were uniformly measured with standardized, validated instruments is therefore not supported for this study. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn nine of 10 studies which compared men and women, men's grief scores were significantly lower or less intense than those of women.
“In nine of 10 studies which compared men and women, men’s grief scores were significantly lower or less intense than those of women [67, 94, 96].”
From Men’s grief following pregnancy loss and neonatal loss: a systematic review and emerging theoretical model (2020) · cites this paper as [67]
The Results (Psychological outcome; page not provided) report significantly higher grief scores among women than men in this study. The paper does not report a comparison of ten studies or the claimed nine-of-ten count. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn five quantitative studies, increasing gestational age was associated with higher grief scores.
“In five quantitative studies, increasing gestational age was associated with higher grief scores [23–25, 67, 93].”
From Men’s grief following pregnancy loss and neonatal loss: a systematic review and emerging theoretical model (2020) · cites this paper as [67]
The Results (Psychological outcome; page unavailable) report higher active-grief scores among men whose partners terminated in the second trimester than among those whose partners terminated in the first. The paper does not establish this association for women or count five studies with that finding; its Introduction says prior findings on gestational age were conflicting. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThirteen included studies used the Perinatal Grief Scale (PGS) as a primary measure of grief.
“Although 13 studies used the Perinatal Grief Scale (PGS) as a primary measure of grief”
From Men’s grief following pregnancy loss and neonatal loss: a systematic review and emerging theoretical model (2020) · cites this paper as [67]
Of the 12 quantitative studies that provided raw grief scores for men, outcomes varied considerably both between studies and within them.
“Of the 12 quantitative studies that provided raw grief scores for men, outcomes varied considerably both between studies and within them [23, 25, 67, 76, 84, 87, 88, 91, 93–96].”
From Men’s grief following pregnancy loss and neonatal loss: a systematic review and emerging theoretical model (2020) · cites this paper as [67]
Of the included quantitative studies, 16 included an analysis on predictors of men's grief and/or correlations to related factors.
“Of the included quantitative studies, 16 included an analysis on predictors of men’s grief and/or correlations to related factors [23–25, 67, 76, 84, 86–93, 95, 96].”
From Men’s grief following pregnancy loss and neonatal loss: a systematic review and emerging theoretical model (2020) · cites this paper as [67]
In one quantitative study, involvement in organised religious activity was inversely associated with Despair subscale scores on the PGS for men (p = 0.047).
“In one quantitative study [67], involvement in organised religious activity was inversely associated with Despair subscale scores on the PGS for men (p = 0.047).”
From Men’s grief following pregnancy loss and neonatal loss: a systematic review and emerging theoretical model (2020) · cites this paper as [67]
In some quantitative studies, men's grief was less intense compared to women's.
“Although men’s grief was less intense compared to women’s in some quantitative studies [23, 67, 76, 88, 91, 93, 94, 96], qualitative studies identified the significant impact of loss on men.”
From Men’s grief following pregnancy loss and neonatal loss: a systematic review and emerging theoretical model (2020) · cites this paper as [67]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Psychometric properties of the Impact of Event Scale—Revised
Creamer, M., Bell, R., & Failla, S. (2003) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2003.07.010 · Cited by 1,947 · see citing works
The Duke University Religion Index (DUREL): A Five-Item Measure for Use in Epidemological Studies
Koenig, H. G., & Büssing, A. (2010) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel1010078 · Cited by 1,113 · see citing works
A grief ignored: narratives of pregnancy loss from a male perspective
McCreight, B. S. (2004) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2004.00393.x · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Toedter, L. J., Lasker, J. N., & Janssen, H. J. E. M. (2001) · Death Studies · doi:10.1080/07481180125971 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Toedter, L. J., Lasker, J. N., & Janssen, H. J. E. M. (2001) · Death Studies · doi:10.1080/074811801750073251 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Korenromp, M. J., Christiaens, G. C. M. L., van den Bout, J., Mulder, E. J. H., Hunfeld, J. A. M., Bilardo, C. M., Offermans, J. P. M., & Visser, G. H. A. (2005) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.1127 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Common and specific dimensions of self-reported anxiety and depression: the BDI-II versus the BDI-IA
Steer, R. A., Clark, D. A., Beck, A. T., & Ranieri, W. F. (1999) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(98)00087-4 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Marteau, T. M., Drake, H., & Bobrow, M. (1994) · Journal of Medical Genetics · doi:10.1136/jmg.31.11.864 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Evidence for Healing Interventions With Perinatal Bereavement
Capitulo, K. L. (2005) · MCN The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing · doi:10.1097/00005721-200511000-00007 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
6-year experience of prenatal diagnosis in an unselected population in Oxford, UK
Boyd, P. A., Chamberlain, P. F., & Hicks, N. (1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(98)03202-4 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Decision-making for termination of pregnancies with fetal anomalies: analysis of 53,000 pregnancies
Schechtman, K. B. (2002) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01673-8 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
A Waste of Life: Fathers' Experience of Losing a Child Before Birth
Samuelsson, M., Rådestad, I., & Segesten, K. (2001) · Birth · doi:10.1046/j.1523-536x.2001.00124.x · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Davies, V., Gledhill, J. A., McFadyen, A., Whitlow, B., & Economides, D. L. (2005) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.1854 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Korenromp, M. J., Page-Christiaens, G. C. M. L., van den Bout, J., Mulder, E. J. H., & Visser, G. H. A. (2009) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2009.04.007 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Kersting, A., Kroker, K., Steinhard, J., Hoernig-Franz, I., Wesselmann, U., Lüdorff, K., Ohrmann, P., Arolt, V., & Suslow, T. (2009) · Archives of Women s Mental Health · doi:10.1007/s00737-009-0063-8 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Prenatal diagnosis of fetal abnormality: psychological effects on women in low-risk pregnancies
Statham, H., Solomou, W., & Chitty, L. S. (2000) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1053/beog.2000.0108 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Fathers’ Perspectives During Pregnancy, Postperinatal Loss
O'Leary, J., & Thorwick, C. (2006) · Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1552-6909.2006.00017.x · Cited by 124 · see citing works
A prospective study on parental coping 4 months after termination of pregnancy for fetal anomalies
Korenromp, M. J., Christiaens, G. C. M. L., van den Bout, J., Mulder, E. J. H., Hunfeld, J. A. M., Potters, C. M. A. A., Erwich, J. J. H. M., van Binsbergen, C. J. M., Brons, J. T. J., Beekhuis, J. R., et al. (2007) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.1763 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
The psychosocial sequelae of a second‐trimester termination of pregnancy for fetal abnormality
Mourik, M. C. A. W., Connor, J. M., & Ferguson‐Smith, M. A. (1992) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.1970120308 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Trauma and grief 2–7 years after termination of pregnancy because of fetal anomalies – a pilot study
Kersting, A., Dorsch, M., Kreulich, C., Reutemann, M., Ohrmann, P., Baez, E., & Arolt, V. (2005) · Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1080/01443610400022967 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Johnson, C. Y., Honein, M. A., Flanders, W. D., et al. (2012) · Birth Defects Research Part A Clinical and Molecular Teratology · doi:10.1002/bdra.23086 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Redlinger‐Grosse, K., Bernhardt, B. A., Berg, K. A., Muenke, M., & Biesecker, B. B. (2002) · American Journal of Medical Genetics · doi:10.1002/ajmg.10657 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Zeanah, C. H., Dailey, J. V., Rosenblatt, M. J., & Saller, D. N. (1993) · PubMed · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Deak, K. L., Siegel, D. G., George, T. M., et al. (2008) · Birth Defects Research Part A Clinical and Molecular Teratology · doi:10.1002/bdra.20511 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Psychiatric outcome of termination of pregnancy for foetal abnormality
Iles, S., & Gath, D. (1993) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291700028506 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
A 1 and 6 month follow‐up of prenatal diagnosis patients who lost pregnancies
Black, R. B. (1989) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.1970091108 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Korenromp, M. J., Page-Christiaens, G. C. M. L., van den Bout, J., Mulder, E. J. H., Hunfeld, J. A. M., Bilardo, C. M., Offermans, J. P. M., & Visser, G. H. A. (2005) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.1307 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Grieving the wanted child: Ramifications of abortion after prenatal diagnosis of abnormality
Kolker, A., & Burke, B. M. (1993) · Health Care For Women International · doi:10.1080/07399339309516081 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Survey of physicians' approach to severe fetal anomalies
Heuser, C. C., Eller, A., & Byrne, J. L. B. (2012) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2011-100340 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Robson, F. M. (2002) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/1359105302007002457 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Genetic Counseling for Prenatal Testing: Where is the Discussion About Disability?
Farrelly, E. R., Cho, M. K., Erby, L. H., et al. (2012) · Journal of Genetic Counseling · doi:10.1007/s10897-012-9484-z · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Burgoine, G. A., Kirk, S. D. V., Romm, J., Edelman, A. B., Jacobson, S., & Jensen, J. T. (2005) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2005.02.064 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Cowchock, F. S., Ellestad, S. E., Meador, K. G., Koenig, H. G., Hooten, E. G., & Swamy, G. K. (2011) · Journal of Religion and Health · doi:10.1007/s10943-011-9528-y · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Predicting depressive symptoms and grief after pregnancy loss
Mann, J. R., McKeown, R. E., Bacon, J., Vesselinov, R., & Bush, F. (2008) · Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1080/01674820802015366 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Dallaire, L., Lortie, G., Rochers, M. D., et al. (1995) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.1970150308 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
The Continuing Need for Late Abortions
Grimes, D. A. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.280.8.747 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Yoon, J. D., Rasinski, K. A., & Curlin, F. A. (2010) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e3181eabacc · Cited by 31 · see citing works
(2013) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000437384.88715.03 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Obst, K. L., Due, C., Oxlad, M., & Middleton, P. (2020) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-019-2677-9 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Obst, K. L., Oxlad, M., Due, C., & Middleton, P. (2021) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-020-03514-6 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cope, H., Garrett, M. E., Gregory, S., & Ashley-Koch, A.
- Affiliations
- Duke Medical Center (US)
- Center for Human Disease Modeling; Duke University Medical Center; Durham NC USA
- Corresponding author
- Cope, Heidi
- Venue
- Prenatal Diagnosis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-05-26
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 761-768
- ISSN
- 0197-3851 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4968036
- OpenAlex
- W1792196047
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 2.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- Prenatal Diagnosis (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (NS039818)
- Genetic Counseling Foundation (n/a)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Keywords
- abortion, continuation of pregnancy, anencephaly, neural tube defects, perinatal grief, post-traumatic stress, depression, religiosity, gender differences, psychological outcomes
- MeSH terms
- Abortion, Eugenic, Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Anencephaly, Depression, Female, Fetal Death, Grief, Humans, Male, Pregnancy, Prenatal Diagnosis, Religion, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Logistic Models, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review