Prenatal sonographic diagnosis of congenital hiatal hernia
Abstract
Objectives: To report a rare case of congenital hiatal hernia illustrating the importance of its prenatal diagnosis as well as to discuss the prenatal sonographic criteria. Case Report: A case of congenital hiatal hernia was diagnosed by ultrasound at 33 weeks of gestation. After a normal second‐trimester morphologic ultrasound examination, a hypoechogenic mass was detected in the posterior mediastinum juxtaposed to the vertebral body and seemed to be in continuity with the intra‐abdominal stomach bubble. Congenital hiatal hernia was suspected mainly because of the dynamic position of the stomach during the examination, without mediastinal shift, and normal appearance of the diaphragm on parasagittal sections of the thorax. Postnatal management was planned with no urgency and surgery was successfully performed, confirming the diagnosis. Conclusion: This rare case illustrates the importance of prenatal diagnosis of congenital hiatal hernia for prenatal counseling and postnatal management. The ultrasound criterion for prenatal diagnosis is the presence of a herniated stomach in the posterior mediastinum, sometimes having a dynamic position during examination, with no mediastinal shift associated with normal diaphragm appearance on parasagittal sections of the thorax. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The diaphragmatic interface can often be visualized as a hypoechoic dividing line between the thoracic and abdominal content.
“The diaphragmatic interface can often be visualized as a hypoechoic dividing line between the thoracic and abdominal content (e.g. between heart and stomach or lung and liver) 69,70 .”
From <scp>ISUOG</scp> Practice Guidelines (updated): performance of the routine mid‐trimester fetal ultrasound scan (2022) · cites this paper as [69]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 4 · Cited by 24
- Authors
- Ruano, R., Benachi, A., Aubry, M., Bernard, J., Hameury, F., Nihoul‐Fekete, C., & Dumez, Y.
- Affiliations
- Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades (FR)
- Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Ruano, Rodrigo
- Venue
- Prenatal Diagnosis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-12-16
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 26-30
- ISSN
- 0197-3851 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0223
- OpenAlex
- W2066644203
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Prenatal Diagnosis (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
- Keywords
- prenatal ultrasound, posterior mediastinal mass, mediastinal shift, diaphragm, prenatal counseling, postnatal management
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Fetal Diseases, Hernia, Hiatal, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Male, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, Third, Ultrasonography, Prenatal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review