ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): performance of the routine mid‐trimester fetal ultrasound scan
Open accessAbstract
The International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) is a scientific organization that encourages sound clinical practice, and high-quality teaching and research related to diagnostic imaging in women's healthcare. The ISUOG Clinical Standards Committee (CSC) has a remit to develop Practice Guidelines and Consensus Statements as educational recommendations that provide healthcare practitioners with a consensus-based approach, from experts, for diagnostic imaging. They are intended to reflect what is considered by ISUOG to be the best practice at the time at which they are issued. Although ISUOG has made every effort to ensure that Guidelines are accurate when issued, neither the Society nor any of its employees or members accepts liability for the consequences of any inaccurate or misleading data, opinions or statements issued by the CSC. The ISUOG CSC documents are not intended to establish a legal standard of care, because interpretation of the evidence that underpins the Guidelines may be influenced by individual circumstances, local protocol and available resources. Approved Guidelines can be distributed freely with the permission of ISUOG (info@isuog.org).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 71 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Premisecitation§ Fetal biometry and wellbeing · p. 4
Recent evidence from the INTERGROWTH-21st study indicates that HC alone or HC plus FL may be the most accurate predictor of gestational age after 14 weeks.
“Although head measurements (BPD and HC) and FL have all been used in the past, recent evidence from the INTERGROWTH-21 st study indicates that HC alone or HC plus FL may be the most accurate predictor of gestational age after 14weeks 19 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] 19. Papageorghiou AT, Kemp B, Stones W, Ohuma EO, Kennedy SH, Purwar M, Salomon LJ, Altman DG, Noble JA, Bertino E, Gravett MG, Pang R, Cheikh Ismail L, Barros FC, Lambert A, Jaffer YA, Victora CG, Bhutta ZA, Villar J, for the International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21 st Century (INTERGROWTH-21st). Ultrasound-based gestational-age estimation in late pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 48 : 719-726. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ Recommendation · p. 3
It is likely that the policy of including a mid-trimester ultrasound scan has become even more effective since 2005, as the detection rate of congenital heart defects may have increased.
“It is likely that this policy has become even more effective since then, as the detection rate of congenital heart defects may have increased 6 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] 6. Lytzen R, Vejlstrup N, Bjerre J, Petersen OB, Leenskjold S, Dodd JK, Jørgensen FS, Søndergaard L. Live-Born Major Congenital Heart Disease in Denmark: Incidence, Detection Rate, and Termination of Pregnancy Rate From 1996 to 2013. JAMA Cardiol 2018; 3 : 829-837. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Recommendation · p. 4
When an examination cannot be performed completely in accordance with adopted guidelines, abnormalities are eventually detected in 0.5-5% of such cases.
“as abnormalities are eventually detected in 0.5-5% of such cases 11,12 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [11] 11. Silvestri MT, Pettker CM, Raney JH, Xu X, Ross JS. Frequency and Importance of Incomplete Screening Fetal Anatomic Sonography in Pregnancy. J Ultrasound Med 2016; 35 : 2665-2673. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [12] 12. Waller SA, O'Connell K, Carter A, Gravett MG, Dighe M, Richardson ML, Dubinsky TJ. Incidence of fetal anomalies after incomplete anatomic surveys between 16 and 22 weeks. Ultrasound Q 2013; 29 : 307-312. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Fetal biometry and wellbeing · p. 5
Recent evidence suggests that outer-to-outer placement of calipers eases standardization, reproducibility and quality control.
“Recent evidence suggests that outer-to-outer placement of calipers eases standardization, reproducibility and quality control 22 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] 22. Napolitano R, Donadono V, Ohuma EO, Knight CL, Wanyonyi SZ, Kemp B, Norris T, Papageorghiou AT. Scientific basis for standardization of fetal head measurements by ultrasound: a reproducibility study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 48 : 80-85. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ INTRODUCTION · p. 2
In experts' hands, most clinically important structural anomalies can be detected.
“In experts' hands, most clinically important structural anomalies can be detected 1 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] 1. Edwards L, Hui L. First and second trimester screening for fetal structural anomalies. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2018; 23 : 102-111. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Recommendations · p. 7
Increased or reduced umbilical cord coiling have no proven significance.
“Increased or reduced umbilical cord coiling have no proven significance and should not be reported as part of the routine mid-trimester scan 52 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [52] 52. Sebire NJ. Pathophysiological significance of abnormal umbilical cord coiling index. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 30 : 804-806. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Recommendations · p. 8
All four aspects of the fetal skull (size, shape, integrity and bone density) can be visualized at the time of the head measurements, when the brain is evaluated for anatomical integrity.
“All these characteristics can be visualized at the time of the head measurements, when the brain is evaluated for anatomical integrity also (Figure 2) 56 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [56] 56. Aubry MC, Aubry JP, Dommergues M. Sonographic prenatal diagnosis of central nervous system abnormalities. Childs Nerv Syst 2003; 19 : 391-402. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Recommendations · p. 6
Mid-trimester sonographic measurements can be used to identify anomalies of fetal size.
“Mid-trimester sonographic measurements can be used to identify anomalies of fetal size 25 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] 25. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, Deter RL, Park SK. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements--a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 151 : 333-337. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Recommendations · p. 10
The heart axis deviates by approximately 45 ± 20° (2 SD) towards the left side of the fetus.
“The heart axis deviates by approximately 45 ± 20 ◦ (2 SD) towards the left side of the fetus 72 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [72] 72. Comstock CH. Normal fetal heart axis and position. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 70 : 255-259.
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Thorax · p. 10
The diaphragmatic interface can often be visualized as a hypoechoic dividing line between the thoracic and abdominal content.
“The diaphragmatic interface can often be visualized as a hypoechoic dividing line between the thoracic and abdominal content (e.g. between heart and stomach or lung and liver) 69,70 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [69] 69. Ruano R, Benachi A, Aubry MC, Bernard JP, Hameury F, Nihoul-Fekete C, Dumez Y. Prenatal sonographic diagnosis of congenital hiatal hernia. Prenat Diagn 2004; 24 : 26-30. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [70] 70. Blaas HG, Eik-Nes SH. Sonographic development of the normal foetal thorax and abdomen across gestation. Prenat Diagn 2008; 28 : 568-580. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Fetal movement · p. 7
Abnormal positioning or unusually restricted or persistently absent fetal movements may suggest abnormal fetal conditions, such as arthrogryposis.
“Abnormal positioning or unusually restricted or persistently absent fetal movements may suggest abnormal fetal conditions, such as arthrogryposis, and should prompt a request for referral 44 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [44] 44. Bonilla-Musoles F, Machado LE, Osborne NG. Multiple congenital contractures (congenital multiple arthrogryposis). J Perinat Med 2002; 30 : 99-104. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Fetal movement · p. 7
Temporary absence of or a reduction in fetal movements during the scan is not a risk factor.
“Temporary absence of or a reduction in fetal movements during the scan should not be considered as a risk factor 43 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [43] 43. de Vries JI, Fong BF. Normal fetal motility: an overview. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27 : 701-711. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Recommendations · p. 10
The three-vessel view and closely related three-vessels-and-trachea view may improve detection of outflow tract, aortic arch and systemic vein anomalies.
“The three-vessel view and closely related three-vessels-and-trachea view may improve detection of outflow tract, aortic arch and systemic vein anomalies (Figure 4d,e) 73-77 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checked- cites [73] 73. Chaoui R, Heling KS, Lopez AS, Thiel G, Karl K. The thymic-thoracic ratio in fetal heart defects: a simple way to identify fetuses at high risk for microdeletion 22q11. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 37 : 397-403. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [74] 74. Karl K, Heling KS, Sarut Lopez A, Thiel G, Chaoui R. Thymic-thoracic ratio in fetuses with trisomy 21, 18 or 13. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 40 : 412-417. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [75] 75. Everwijn SMP, van Nisselrooij AEL, Rozendaal L, Clur SAB, Pajkrt E, Hruda J, Linskens IH, van Lith JM, Blom NA, Haak MC. The effect of the introduction of the three-vessel view on the detection rate of transposition of the great arteries and tetralogy of Fallot. Prenat Diagn 2018; 38 : 951-957. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [76] 76. Bravo C, G´ amez F, P´ erez R, ´ Alvarez T, De Le´ on-Luis J. Fetal Aortic Arch Anomalies: Key Sonographic Views for Their Differential Diagnosis and Clinical Implications Using the Cardiovascular System Sonographic Evaluation Protocol. J Ultrasound Med 2016; 35 : 237-251. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [77] 77. Anton T, Sklansky MS, Perez M, Pretorius DH. The Fetal 3-Vessel Views: An Illustrative Case-Based Tutorial. J Ultrasound Med 2019; 38 : 3335-3347. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Recommendations · p. 6
The three-parameters (HC, AC, FL) formula reported by Hadlock et al. provided the best fetal weight estimates in a large study cohort.
“Despite many efforts to develop new models for calculating EFW, the three-parameters (HC, AC, FL) formula reported by Hadlock et al. 25 provided the best fetal weight estimates in a large study cohort 27 , and should be considered the method of choice for assessment of all fetuses, including those suspected to be either small or large 13 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [25] 25. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, Deter RL, Park SK. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements--a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 151 : 333-337. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [27] 27. Hammami A, Mazer Zumaeta A, Syngelaki A, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH. Ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight: development of new model and assessment of performance of previous models. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018; 52 : 35-43. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Recommendations · p. 6
Recent research suggests that estimated fetal weight as early as the mid trimester could be used in a competing-risks model to predict subsequent small-for-gestational age.
“Recent research suggests that EFW as early as the mid trimester could be used in a competing-risks model to predict subsequent small-for-gestational age 28 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] 28. Papastefanou I, Nowacka U, Syngelaki A, Dragoi V, Karamanis G, Wright D, Nicolaides KH. Competing-risks model for prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate from estimated fetal weight at 19-24 weeks' gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2021; 57 : 917-924. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Recommendations · p. 7
There is no consensus regarding the potential impact of single umbilical artery on pregnancy outcome.
“There is, as yet, no consensus regarding the potential impact of SUA on pregnancy outcome 50,51 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [50] 50. Kim HJ, Kim JH, Chay DB, Park JH, Kim MA. Association of isolated single umbilical artery with perinatal outcomes: Systemic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol Sci 2017; 60 : 266-273. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [51] 51. Voskamp BJ, Fleurke-Rozema H, Oude-Rengerink K, Snijders RJM, Bilardo CM, Mol BWJ, Pajkrt E. Relationship of isolated single umbilical artery to fetal growth, aneuploidy and perinatal mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42 : 622-628. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Femur length (FL) · p. 6
Using older measurement charts may lead to an overestimation of the femur length.
“This has clinical implications and recent measurement charts should be used, as using older ones may lead to an overestimation of the FL 24 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] 24. Stirnemann JJ, Fries N, Bessis R, Fontanges M, Mangione R, Salomon LJ. Implementing the INTERGROWTH-21(st) fetal growth standards in France: a ''flash study'' of the College Franc ¸ais d'Echographie Foetale (CFEF). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017; 49 : 487-492. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Recommendations · p. 14
Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of women with singleton gestation, no prior spontaneous preterm birth and transvaginal sonographic CL <25mm before 24 weeks have shown that administration of vaginal progesterone significantly decreases the risk of preterm birth and neonatal morbidity.
“Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of women with singleton gestation, no prior spontaneous preterm birth and transvaginal sonographic CL < 25mm before 24weeks have shown that administration of vaginal progesterone significantly decreases the risk of preterm birth and neonatal morbidity 99-101 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [99] 99. Conde-Agudelo A, Romero R, Da Fonseca E, O'Brien JM, Cetingoz E, Creasy GW, Hassan SS, Erez O, Pacora P, Nicolaides KH. Vaginal progesterone is as effective as cervical cerclage to prevent preterm birth in women with a singleton source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [100] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [101] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Recommendations · p. 14
Risk factors for vasa previa include twin pregnancy, conception by assisted reproductive technology, a low-lying or bilobed placenta, succenturiate placental lobes and velamentous cord insertion.
“Risk factors for vasa previa include twin pregnancy, conception by assisted reproductive technology, a low-lying or bilobed placenta, succenturiate placental lobes and velamentous cord insertion 95 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [95] 95. Ruiter L, Kok N, Limpens J, Derks JB, de Graaf IM, Mol B, Pajkrt E. Incidence of and risk indicators for vasa praevia: a systematic review. BJOG 2016; 123 : 1278-1287. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Recommendations · p. 12
The most frequent severe spinal anomaly, open spina bifida, is usually associated with a characteristic cerebellar deformity and an obliterated cisterna magna.
“The most frequent severe spinal anomaly, open spina bifida, is usually associated with a characteristic cerebellar deformity and an obliterated cisterna magna 83 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [83] 83. Van den Hof MC, Nicolaides KH, Campbell J, Campbell S. Evaluation of the lemon and banana signs in one hundred thirty fetuses with open spina bifida. AmJ Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162 : 322-327. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Recommendations · p. 12
At 18 and 22 weeks, the 95th centile for the longitudinal bladder measurement is 14 and 23 mm, respectively.
“At 18 and 22 weeks, the 95 th centile for the longitudinal bladder measurement is 14 and 23 mm, respectively 82 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [82] 82. Fontanella F, Groen H, Duin LK, Suresh S, Bilardo CM. Z-scores of fetal bladder size for antenatal differential diagnosis between posterior urethral valves and urethral atresia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2021; 58 : 875-881. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Recommendations · p. 14
In women with singleton gestation, a short cervix and prior spontaneous preterm birth, cerclage is associated with significant decrease in the risk of preterm birth and neonatal morbidity and mortality.
“In women with singleton gestation, a short cervix and prior spontaneous preterm birth, cerclage is associated with significant decrease in the risk of preterm birth and neonatal morbidity and mortality 107 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [107] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Recommendations · p. 13
Recently suggested cut-offs for likely placental migration for an anteriorly and a posteriorly located placenta were 5 mm and 15.5 mm, respectively, from the internal os, using transvaginal imaging at the mid-trimester scan.
“recently suggested cut-offs for likely placental migration for an anteriorly and a posteriorly located placenta were 5 mm and 15.5 mm, respectively, from the internal os, using transvaginal imaging at the mid-trimester scan 91 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [91] 91. Jansen CHJR, Kleinrouweler CE, Kastelein AW, Ruiter L, van Leeuwen E, Mol BW, Pajkrt E. Follow-up ultrasound in second-trimester low-positioned anterior and posterior placentae: prospective cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020; 56 : 725-731. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Recommendations · p. 14
Two cost-effectiveness analyses have shown that measurement of CL in the mid trimester and progesterone supplementation in women with a short cervix appears to be a cost-effective screening strategy for preterm birth.
“Two cost-effectiveness analyses have shown that measurement of CL in the mid trimester and progesterone supplementation in women with a short cervix appears to be a cost-effective screening strategy for preterm birth 102,103 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [102] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [103]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Recommendations · p. 14
Several studies have demonstrated a strong correlation between short transvaginal sonographic CL, usually defined as <25mm, especially before 24 weeks, and subsequent preterm birth.
“Several studies have demonstrated a strong correlation between short transvaginal sonographic CL, usually defined as < 25mm, especially before 24weeks, and subsequent preterm birth.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 16
- May combine two claims. 13
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone given§ Recommendation · p. 4Prenatal ultrasonography appears to be safe in clinical practice.
“Prenatal ultrasonography appears to be safe in clinical practice. To date, there has been no independently confirmed study to suggest otherwise.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Fetal biometry and wellbeing · p. 5Abnormal head shape can lead to inaccurate estimates of fetal age when BPD is used; in these cases, HC measurements are more reliable.
“This finding can also lead to inaccurate estimates of fetal age when the BPD is used; in these cases, HC measurements are even more reliable 20,21 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [20] 20. Malinger G, Paladini D, Haratz KK, Monteagudo A, Pilu GL, Timor-Tritsch IE. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): sonographic examination of the fetal central nervous system. Part 1: performance of screening examination and indications for targeted neurosonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020; 56 : 476-484. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [21] 21. Hadlock FP, Deter RL, Carpenter RJ, Park SK. Estimating fetal age: effect of head shape on BPD. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1981; 137 : 83-85. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Recommendation · p. 3Strategies that include a mid-trimester ultrasound scan result in more abnormalities being detected and have lower costs per anomaly detected, according to a 2005 cost-effectiveness analysis.
“A 2005 cost-effectiveness analysis concluded that strategies which include a mid-trimester ultrasound scan result in more abnormalities being detected and have lower costs per anomaly detected 5 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] 5. Ritchie K, Bradbury I, Slattery J, Wright D, Iqbal K, Penney G. Economic modelling of antenatal screening and ultrasound scanning programmes for identification of fetal abnormalities. BJOG 2005; 112 : 866-874. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Femur length (FL) · p. 6Technical improvements in modern ultrasound machines have reduced the beam width, which has affected fetal measurements in the lateral direction.
“Technical improvements in modern ultrasound machines have reduced the beam width, which has affected fetal measurements in the lateral direction 23 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [23] 23. Økland I, Bj˚ astad TG, Johansen TF, Gjessing HK, Grøttum P, Eik-Nes SH. Narrowed beam width in newer ultrasound machines shortens measurements in the lateral direction: fetal measurement charts may be obsolete. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 38 : 82-87. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Recommendation · p. 6Observational evidence comparing ultrasound with dye-determination of amniotic fluid volume has shown that deepest vertical pocket may be superior for identifying oligohydramnios and amniotic fluid index superior for identifying polyhydramnios.
“Observational evidence comparing ultrasound with dye-determination of amniotic fluid volume has shown that DVP may be superior for identifying oligohydramnios and the AFI superior for identifying polyhydramnios 39 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] 39. Hughes DS, Magann EF, Whittington JR, Wendel MP, Sandlin AT, Ounpraseuth ST. Accuracy of the Ultrasound Estimate of the Amniotic Fluid Volume (Amniotic Fluid Index and Single Deepest Pocket) to Identify Actual Low, Normal, and High Amniotic Fluid Volumes as Determined by Quantile Regression. J Ultrasound Med 2020; 39 : 373-378. source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ Recommendations · p. 12A renal pelvis ≥ 7mm indicates a need for reassessment in the third trimester.
“A renal pelvis ≥ 7mm indicates a need for reassessment in the third trimester 80,81 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [80] 80. Sairam S, Al-Habib A, Sasson S, Thilaganathan B. Natural history of fetal hydronephrosis diagnosed on mid-trimester ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 17 : 191-196. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [81] 81. Nguyen HT, Benson CB, Bromley B, Campbell JB, Chow J, Coleman B, Cooper C, Crino J, Darge K, Herndon CDA, Odibo AO, Somers MJG, Stein DR. Multidisciplinary consensus on the classification of prenatal and postnatal urinary tract dilation (UTD classification system). J Pediatr Urol 2014; 10 : 982-998. source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ Recommendations · p. 8Chorionicity is better evaluated before 14-15 weeks, when the lambda sign or T-sign can be determined.
“however, chorionicity is better evaluated before 14-15weeks, when the lambda sign or T-sign can be determined;”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [54] 54. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 47 : 247-263. source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ Recommendations · p. 6Estimated fetal weight or abdominal circumference can be used as a baseline parameter for the detection of subsequent growth problems.
“Estimated fetal weight (EFW) or AC can be used as a baseline parameter for the detection of subsequent growth problems 26 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] 26. McCowan LM, Figueras F, Anderson NH. Evidence-based national guidelines for the management of suspected fetal growth restriction: comparison, consensus, and controversy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 218 (2S): S855-S868. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Recommendation · p. 6Amniotic fluid index identifies more women as having oligohydramnios than does deepest vertical pocket, thereby increasing the rate of labor induction, but without improving clinical outcome.
“However, it appears that AFI identifies more women as having oligohydramnios than does DVP, thereby increasing the rate of labor induction, but without improving the clinical outcome 37,38 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [37] 37. Magann EF, Chauhan SP, Doherty DA, Magann MI, Morrison JC. The evidence for abandoning the amniotic fluid index in favor of the single deepest pocket. Am J Perinatol 2007; 24 : 549-555. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [38] 38. Kehl S, Schelkle A, Thomas A, Puhl A, Meqdad K, Tuschy B, Berlit S, Weiss C, Bayer C, Heimrich J, Dammer U, Raabe E, Winkler M, Faschingbauer F, Beckmann MW, S¨ utterlin M. Single deepest vertical pocket or amniotic fluid index as evaluation test for predicting adverse pregnancy outcome (SAFE trial): a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 47 : 674-679. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Recommendation · p. 6Both amniotic fluid index and deepest vertical pocket correlate poorly with the actual dye-calculated volume of amniotic fluid, and neither appears significantly better than the other.
“Both AFI and DVP correlate poorly with the actual dye-calculated volume of amniotic fluid, and neither of them appears significantly better than the other 37 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [37] 37. Magann EF, Chauhan SP, Doherty DA, Magann MI, Morrison JC. The evidence for abandoning the amniotic fluid index in favor of the single deepest pocket. Am J Perinatol 2007; 24 : 549-555. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Recommendations · p. 7Single umbilical artery is associated with congenital anomalies and fetal growth restriction, although it does not constitute an anomaly per se.
“SUA is associated with congenital anomalies and FGR 49 , although it does not constitute an anomaly per se .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [49] 49. Hasegawa J. Ultrasound screening of umbilical cord abnormalities and delivery management. Placenta 2018; 62 : 66-78. source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ Recommendations · p. 9Two axial planes, commonly referred to as the transventricular and transthalamic planes, permit visualization of the cerebral structures relevant to the anatomical integrity of the brain.
“Two axial planes, commonly referred to as the transventricular and transthalamic planes, permit visualization of the cerebral structures relevant to the anatomical integrity of the brain (Figure 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] 20. Malinger G, Paladini D, Haratz KK, Monteagudo A, Pilu GL, Timor-Tritsch IE. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): sonographic examination of the fetal central nervous system. Part 1: performance of screening examination and indications for targeted neurosonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020; 56 : 476-484. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Recommendations · p. 7Single umbilical artery is the result of obliteration or atrophy of one of the arteries, most commonly the left.
“Single umbilical artery (SUA) is the result of obliteration or atrophy of one of the arteries, most commonly the left 48 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [48] 48. Santillan M, Santillan D, Fleener D, Stegmann B, Zamba G, Hunter S, Yankowitz J. Single umbilical artery: Does side matter? Fetal Diagn Ther 2012; 32 : 201-208. source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ Recommendations · p. 8Reporting distinguishing features (gender, unique markers, position in uterus) is critical to label twins correctly.
“reporting of distinguishing features (gender, unique markers, position in uterus), as it is critical to label twins correctly 55 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [55] 55. Dias T, Arcangeli T, Bhide A, Napolitano R, Mahsud-Dornan S, Thilaganathan B. First-trimester ultrasound determination of chorionicity in twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 38 : 530-532. source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationcitation§ Recommendation · p. 7There is insufficient evidence to support universal use of uterine or umbilical artery pulsed Doppler evaluation for the screening of low-risk pregnancies.
“There is insufficient evidence to support universal use of uterine or umbilical artery pulsed Doppler evaluation for the screening of low-risk pregnancies 53 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [53] 53. Alfirevic Z, Stampalija T, Medley N. Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in normal pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; ( 4 ): CD001450. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Recommendations · p. 7The insertion of the umbilical cord is central in about 80% of cases, paracentral in about 12%, marginal in 5-8%, and velamentous in approximately 1%.
“The insertion of the umbilical cord is in the center of the placenta in about 80% of cases, paracentral in about 12% of cases and marginal (within 2 cm of the placental edge) in 5-8% of cases. Velamentous insertion occurs in approximately 1% of cases, and is defined as insertion of the umbilical vessels within the amniotic membranes instead of the placenta 46 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] 46. Padula F, Lagan` a AS, Vitale SG, Mangiafico L, D'Emidio L, Cignini P, Giorlandino M, Gulino FA, Capriglione S, Giorlandino C. Ultrasonographic evaluation of placental cord insertion at different gestational ages in low-risk singleton pregnancies: a predictive algorithm. Facts Views Vis ObGyn 2016; 8 : 3-7.
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Amniotic membranes · p. 7Amniotic sheets are benign findings, to be distinguished from amniotic bands which may cause fetal deformities.
“Amniotic sheets are benign findings, to be distinguished from amniotic bands which may cause fetal deformities 40-42 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [40] 40. Ples ¸ L, Sima RM, Moisei C, Moga MA, Dracea L. Abnormal ultrasound appearance of the amniotic membranes - diagnostic and significance: a pictorial essay. Med Ultrason 2017; 19 : 211-215. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [41] 41. Shetty P, Menezes LT, Tauro LF, Diddigi KA. Amniotic band syndrome. Indian J Surg 2013; 75 : 401-402. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [42] 42. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine,Gandhi M, Rac MWF, McKinney J. Amniotic Band Sequence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019; 221 : B5-B6. source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ Recommendations · p. 10Fetal cardiac screening is performed for the detection of congenital heart disease during the mid-trimester scan.
“Fetal cardiac screening is performed for the detection of congenital heart disease during the mid-trimester scan (Figure 4) 71 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [71] 71. International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology,Carvalho JS, Allan LD, Chaoui R, Copel JA, DeVore GR, Hecher K, Lee W, Munoz H, Paladini D, Tutschek B, Yagel S. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): sonographic screening examination of the fetal heart. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41 : 348-359. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Fetal movement · p. 7The biophysical profile is not considered part of the routine mid-trimester scan.
“The biophysical profile is not considered part of the routine mid-trimester scan 45 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [45] 45. Manning FA. Fetal biophysical profile. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1999; 26 : 557-577. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Thorax · p. 10Both lungs should appear homogeneous and without evidence of mediastinal shift or masses.
“Both lungs should appear homogeneous and without evidence of mediastinal shift or masses 68 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [68] 68. Delacourt C, Bertille N, Salomon LJ, Benachi A, Henry E, Massardier J, Mottet N, Rosenblatt J, Sartor A, Thong-Vanh C, Valat-Rigot AS, Winer N, Lelong N, Khoshnood B, for the Prenatal MALFPULM Study Group, Alanio E, Bory J -P., Aquilue LN, Choupeaux L, Hauw C, Banaszkiewicz N, Bertorello S, Lebouar G, Biquard F, Sentilhes L, Bonfiglioli V, Carbillon L, Bonnard A, Bremont F, Bultez T, Roth P, Stirnemann J, Ville Y, Castaigne V, Touboul C, Coatleven F, Mangione R, Darras A -M., Guilbaud L, Jouannic J-M., Dazel-Salonne C, Ducoin H, Dugue-Marechaud M, Goua V, Eszto-Cambon M-L., Fange C, Prieur source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Recommendations · p. 14Prenatal knowledge of vasa previa significantly increases survival and decreases perinatal morbidity.
“prenatal knowledge of vasa previa significantly increases survival and decreases perinatal morbidity 96 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [96] 96. Zhang W, Geris S, Al-Emara N, Ramadan G, Sotiriadis A, Akolekar R. Perinatal outcome of pregnancies with prenatal diagnosis of vasa previa: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2021; 57 : 710-719. source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisereasoning§ Recommendations · p. 14Transvaginal ultrasound CL measurement is commonly recommended in the general population.
“For these reasons, transvaginal ultrasound CL measurement is commonly recommended in the general population 104-106 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Recommendations · p. 14Several medical societies recommend serial transvaginal sonographic CL measurement at 16-23 weeks in women with singleton gestation, a short cervix and prior spontaneous preterm birth.
“Several medical societies recommend serial transvaginal sonographic CL measurement at 16-23 weeks in this population 104,105,108,109 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Thorax · p. 10The shape of the thorax should be regular, with a smooth transition to the abdomen.
“The shape of the thorax should be regular, with a smooth transition to the abdomen 67 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [67] 67. Azouz EM, Teebi AS, Eydoux P, Chen MF, Fassier F. Bone dysplasias: an introduction. Can Assoc Radiol J 1998; 49 : 105-109.
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Recommendations · p. 14There is ongoing debate regarding whether routine screening for velamentous cord insertion and/or vasa previa should be performed at the mid-trimester scan; the evidence is of limited quality and fails to take into account the consequences of over-diagnosing such anomalies.
“There is, however, ongoing debate regarding whether routine screening for velamentous cord insertion and/or vasa previa should be performed at the mid-trimester scan; the evidence is of limited quality and fails to take into account the consequences of over-diagnosing such anomalies 47,88 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [47] 47. Buchanan-Hughes A, Bobrowska A, Visintin C, Attilakos G, Marshall J. Velamentous cord insertion: results from a rapid review of incidence, risk factors, adverse outcomes and screening. Syst Rev 2020; 9 : 147. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [88] 88. Jauniaux E, Alfirevic Z, Bhide AG, Burton GJ, Collins SL, Silver R, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Vasa Praevia: Diagnosis and Management: Green-top Guideline No. 27b. BJOG 2019; 126 : e49-e61. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Recommendations · p. 12Other views of the fetal spine may identify other spinal malformations, including vertebral anomalies and sacral agenesis.
“Other views of the fetal spine may identify other spinal malformations, including vertebral anomalies and sacral agenesis 20 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] 20. Malinger G, Paladini D, Haratz KK, Monteagudo A, Pilu GL, Timor-Tritsch IE. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): sonographic examination of the fetal central nervous system. Part 1: performance of screening examination and indications for targeted neurosonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020; 56 : 476-484. source
Not checked in the free run.
The paper relies on this without support.
There are significant differences in detection rates between centers and between operators.
“However, there are significant differences in detection rates between centers and between operators.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The mid-trimester fetal ultrasound scan serves as a baseline against which later scans can be compared for the evaluation of fetal growth.
“The mid-trimester fetal ultrasound scan also serves as a baseline against which later scans can be compared for the evaluation of fetal growth.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Most countries offer one mid-trimester scan as part of routine prenatal care.
“Most countries offer one mid-trimester scan as part of routine prenatal care.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Abnormal head shape can be associated with syndromes or be the result of oligohydramnios or breech presentation.
“Abnormal head shape (e.g. brachycephaly or dolichocephaly) can be associated with syndromes or be the result of oligohydramnios or breech presentation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The degree of deviation from normal at mid-trimester that would justify action has not been established.
“However, the degree of deviation from normal at this early stage of pregnancy that would justify action (e.g. follow-up scan to assess fetal growth or fetal chromosomal analysis) has not been established.”
The paper relies on this without support.
From 16 weeks onwards, the amnion and chorion are usually fused.
“From 16weeks onwards, the amnion and chorion are usually fused.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Normal fetuses typically have a neutral position and show regular movements.
“Normal fetuses typically have a neutral position and show regular movements.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A velamentous cord insertion may be associated with vasa previa and fetal growth restriction.
“A velamentous cord insertion may be associated with vasa previa and FGR.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Single umbilical artery is more frequent in twin pregnancy.
“It is more frequent in twin pregnancy.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Rarely, brain tissue can extrude through defects, for example, of the frontal or occipital bones.
“Rarely, brain tissue can extrude through defects, for example, of the frontal or occipital bones.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Normally, high skull density manifests as a continuous echogenic structure that is interrupted only by cranial sutures in specific anatomical locations.
“normally, high skull density manifests as a continuous echogenic structure that is interrupted only by cranial sutures in specific anatomical locations.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Vasa previa is found in approximately 0.5 per 1000 pregnancies in the general population.
“Vasa previa, defined as unprotected fetal vessels running through the fetal membranes, over or within 2 cm of the internal cervical os, is found in approximately 0.5 per 1000 pregnancies in the general population.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The neck normally appears as cylindrical, with no protuberances, masses or fluid collections.
“The neck normally appears as cylindrical, with no protuberances, masses or fluid collections.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A normal, regular heart rate typically ranges from 120 to 160 bpm.
“A normal, regular heart rate typically ranges from 120 to 160 bpm.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The heart is positioned in the left chest (as is the fetal stomach) if the situs is normal.
“The heart is positioned in the left chest (as is the fetal stomach) if the situs is normal.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A normal heart is usually no larger than one-third of the area of the chest and is without pericardial effusion.
“A normal heart is usually no larger than one-third of the area of the chest and is without pericardial effusion.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Normal-appearing great vessels are approximately equal in size and should cross each other as they exit their respective ventricular chambers.
“Normal-appearing great vessels are approximately equal in size and should cross each other as they exit their respective ventricular chambers (Figure 4b,c).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Routine assessment of the cardiac outflow tracts in addition to the four-chamber view increases the screening performance for identifying conotruncal anomalies, such as tetralogy of Fallot, transposition of the great arteries, double-outlet right ventricle and truncus arteriosus communis.
“Routine assessment of the cardiac outflow tracts in addition to the four-chamber view increases the screening performance for identifying conotruncal anomalies, such as tetralogy of Fallot, transposition of the great arteries, double-outlet right ventricle and truncus arteriosus communis.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The fetal stomach should be clearly visible in its normal position on the left side and should occupy about one-third of the left half of the transverse section of the fetal abdomen used for AC measurement.
“The fetal stomach should be clearly visible in its normal position on the left side and should occupy about one-third of the left half of the transverse section of the fetal abdomen used for AC measurement.”
The paper relies on this without support.
An abnormal location of any of the stomach, umbilical vein and gallbladder may be associated with a congenital anomaly (e.g. persistent right umbilical vein, heterotaxy, portohepatic shunt).
“An abnormal location of any of these structures may be associated with a congenital anomaly (e.g. persistent right umbilical vein, heterotaxy, portohepatic shunt).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The bowel should be contained within the abdomen.
“The bowel should be contained within the abdomen.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The fetal bladder should not reach the level of the umbilical cord insertion.
“The fetal bladder should not reach the level of the umbilical cord insertion.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A satisfactory examination of the fetal spine requires expertise and meticulous scanning, and the results are very dependent upon fetal position.
“A satisfactory examination of the fetal spine requires expertise and meticulous scanning, and the results are very dependent upon fetal position.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In most cases, in the routine mid-trimester examination, transabdominal ultrasonography permits clear definition of the relationship between the placenta and the internal cervical os.
“In most cases, in the routine mid-trimester examination, transabdominal ultrasonography permits clear definition of the relationship between the placenta and the internal cervical os.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Women with a history of uterine surgery and low anterior placenta or placenta previa are at risk for placenta accreta spectrum disorders.
“Women with a history of uterine surgery and low anterior placenta or placenta previa are at risk for placenta accreta spectrum disorders.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Not all medical practices may have sufficient experience in transvaginal sonography or the resources for proper disinfection procedures.
“Furthermore, not all medical practices may have sufficient experience in transvaginal sonography or the resources for proper disinfection procedures.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Examples of abnormal placental findings include the presence of hemorrhage, multiple anechoic cysts (distinct from normal lacunae) in triploidy, and placental masses, such as chorioangioma.
“Examples of abnormal placental findings include the presence of hemorrhage, multiple anechoic cysts (distinct from normal lacunae) in triploidy, and placental masses, such as chorioangioma.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The ribs should have normal curvature, without deformity.
“The ribs should have normal curvature, without deformity.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Systematic evaluation of fetal anatomy during the first trimester allows for the identification of major structural anomalies.
“Systematic evaluation of fetal anatomy during this period allows for the identification of major structural anomalies, although until recently basic fetal anatomical assessments were primarily performed during the second trimester, which served as the gold standard [4].”
From First-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines (2026) · cites this paper as [4]
The Recommendation (p. 3) says anomalies may be seen or suspected at a first-trimester scan, and the Introduction (p. 2) describes the mid-trimester scan as the main anatomical evaluation. The source does not establish that systematic first-trimester anatomical evaluation identifies major structural anomalies, or call the second-trimester assessment the gold standard. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredUntil recently, basic fetal anatomical assessments were primarily performed during the second trimester, which served as the gold standard.
“Systematic evaluation of fetal anatomy during this period allows for the identification of major structural anomalies, although until recently basic fetal anatomical assessments were primarily performed during the second trimester, which served as the gold standard [4].”
From First-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines (2026) · cites this paper as [4]
The Introduction (p. 2) says the mid-trimester scan is performed mainly to evaluate fetal anatomy, and General Considerations (p. 2) lists basic fetal anatomy as part of that scan. The paper does not establish that this practice prevailed only until recently or describe the second-trimester assessment as the gold standard. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredScanning guidelines comprise a checklist of standard planes, structures and anatomies to be surveyed, but do not dictate the order in which the checklist should be populated.
“Such scanning guidelines comprise typically a checklist of standard planes, structures and anatomies to be surveyed, but do not dictate the order in which the checklist should be populated.”
From Clinical workflow of sonographers performing fetal anomaly ultrasound scans: Deep-learning-based analysis (2022) · cites this paper as [9]
Cites
Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements—A prospective study
Hadlock, F. P., Harrist, R. B., Sharman, R. S., Deter, R. L., & Park, S. K. (1985) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0002-9378(85)90298-4 · Cited by 2,682 · see citing works
Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure: Consensus definition of FGR
Gordijn, S. J., Beune, I. M., Thilaganathan, B., Papageorghiou, A., Baschat, A. A., Baker, P. N., Silver, R. M., Wynia, K., & Ganzevoort, W. (2016) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.15884 · Cited by 1,638 · see citing works
Practice guidelines for performance of the routine mid-trimester fetal ultrasound scan
Salomon, L. J., Alfirevic, Z., Berghella, V., Bilardo, C., Hernandez‐Andrade, E., Johnsen, S. L., Kalache, K., Leung, K. ‐., Malinger, G., Munoz, H., et al. (2011) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.8831 · Cited by 1,006 · see citing works
Self-citationHassan, S. S., Romero, R., Vidyadhari, D., Fusey, S., Baxter, J. K., Khandelwal, M., Vijayaraghavan, J., Trivedi, Y., Soma‐Pillay, P., Sambarey, P., et al. (2011) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.9017 · Cited by 923 · see citing works
Lees, C. C., Stampalija, T., Baschat, A. A., da Silva Costa, F., Ferrazzi, E., Figueras, F., Hecher, K., Kingdom, J., Poon, L. C., Salomon, L. J., et al. (2020) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.22134 · Cited by 886 · see citing works
Self-citationISUOG Practice Guidelines: ultrasound assessment of fetal biometry and growth
Salomon, L. J., Alfirevic, Z., Da Silva Costa, F., Deter, R. L., Figueras, F., Ghi, T., Glanc, P., Khalil, A., Lee, W., Napolitano, R., et al. (2019) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.20272 · Cited by 704 · see citing works
Self-citation<scp>ISUOG</scp> Practice Guidelines (updated): sonographic screening examination of the fetal heart
Carvalho, J., Allan, L., Chaoui, R., Copel, J., DeVore, G., Hecher, K., Lee, W., Munoz, H., Paladini, D., Tutschek, B., et al. (2013) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.12403 · Cited by 681 · see citing works
Self-citationNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence.
Cowie, M. (2015) · PubMed · Cited by 651 · see citing works
ISUOG Practice Guidelines: role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy
Khalil, A., Rodgers, M., Baschat, A., Bhide, A., Gratacos, E., Hecher, K., Kilby, M. D., Lewi, L., Nicolaides, K. H., Oepkes, D., et al. (2016) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.15821 · Cited by 645 · see citing works
Self-citation<scp>ISUOG</scp> Practice Guidelines: performance of first‐trimester fetal ultrasound scan
(2013) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.12342 · Cited by 621 · see citing works
Self-citationPractice Bulletin No. 130: Prediction and Prevention of Preterm Birth
(2012) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e3182723b1b · Cited by 590 · see citing works
Nguyen, H. T., Benson, C. B., Bromley, B., Campbell, J. B., Chow, J., Coleman, B., Cooper, C., Crino, J., Darge, K., Anthony Herndon, C. D., et al. (2014) · Journal of Pediatric Urology · doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.10.002 · Cited by 561 · see citing works
Ultrasound evaluation of amniotic fluid volume
Chamberlain, P. F., Manning, F. A., Morrison, I., Harman, C. R., & Lange, I. R. (1984) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(84)90359-4 · Cited by 526 · see citing works
Romero, R., Conde-Agudelo, A., Da Fonseca, E., O’Brien, J. M., Cetingoz, E., Creasy, G. W., Hassan, S. S., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2018) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.576 · Cited by 522 · see citing works
Placenta Praevia and Placenta Accreta: Diagnosis and Management: Green‐top Guideline No. 27a
Jauniaux, E., Alfirevic, Z., Bhide, A., Belfort, M., Burton, G., Collins, S., Dornan, S., Jurkovic, D., Kayem, G., Kingdom, J., et al. (2019) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.15306 · Cited by 506 · see citing works
Self-citationMcCowan, L. M., Figueras, F., & Anderson, N. H. (2018) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.004 · Cited by 451 · see citing works
FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum disorders: Prenatal diagnosis and screening,
Jauniaux, E. R. M., Bhide, A., Kennedy, A., Woodward, P. J., Hubinont, C., Collins, S., & Panel, F. T. F. P. A. D. A. M. E. C. (2018) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1002/ijgo.12408 · Cited by 385 · see citing works
Progesterone and preterm birth prevention: translating clinical trials data into clinical practice
(2012) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2012.03.010 · Cited by 341 · see citing works
Proposal for standardized ultrasound descriptors of abnormally invasive placenta ( <scp>AIP</scp> )
Collins, S. L., Ashcroft, A., Braun, T., Calda, P., Langhoff‐Roos, J., Morel, O., Stefanovic, V., Tutschek, B., Chantraine, F., & on behalf of the European Working Group on Abnormally Invasive Placenta (EW‐AIP) (2016) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.14952 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
Malinger, G., Paladini, D., Haratz, K. K., Monteagudo, A., Pilu, G. L., & Timor‐Tritsch, I. E. (2020) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.22145 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
Self-citationUltrasound evaluation of amniotic fluid volume
Chamberlain, P. F., Manning, F. A., Morrison, I., Harman, C. R., & Lange, I. R. (1984) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(84)90360-0 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Natural history of fetal hydronephrosis diagnosed on mid‐trimester ultrasound
Sairam, S., Al‐Habib, A., Sasson, S., & Thilaganathan, B. (2001) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00333.x · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Vasa previa: prenatal diagnosis, natural evolution, and clinical outcome
Lee, W. (2000) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00600-6 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Self-citationNormal fetal motility: an overview
de Vries, J. I. P., & Fong, B. F. (2006) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.2740 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Evaluation of the lemon and banana signs in one hundred thirty fetuses with open spina bifida
Van den Hof, M. C., Nicolaides, K. H., Campbell, J., & Campbell, S. (1990) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0002-9378(90)90378-k · Cited by 207 · see citing works
The amniotic fluid index, single deepest pocket, and two-diameter pocket in normal human pregnancy
Magann, E. F., Sanderson, M., Martin, J. N., Jr., & Chauhan, S. P. (2000) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1067/mob.2000.107325 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in normal pregnancy
Alfirevic, Z., Stampalija, T., & Medley, N. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001450.pub4 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Ultrasound‐based gestational‐age estimation in late pregnancy
Papageorghiou, A. T., Kemp, B., Stones, W., Ohuma, E. O., Kennedy, S. H., Purwar, M., Salomon, L. J., Altman, D. G., Noble, J. A., Bertino, E., et al. (2016) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.15894 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Self-citationFirst and second trimester screening for fetal structural anomalies
Edwards, L., & Hui, L. (2018) · Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.siny.2017.11.005 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
How to measure cervical length
Kagan, K. O., & Sonek, J. (2015) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.14742 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Hammami, A., Mazer Zumaeta, A., Syngelaki, A., Akolekar, R., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2018) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.19066 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Lytzen, R., Vejlstrup, N., Bjerre, J., Petersen, O. B., Leenskjold, S., Dodd, J. K., Jørgensen, F. S., & Søndergaard, L. (2018) · JAMA Cardiology · doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2018.2009 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Conde-Agudelo, A., Romero, R., Da Fonseca, E., O’Brien, J. M., Cetingoz, E., Creasy, G. W., Hassan, S. S., Erez, O., Pacora, P., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2018) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2018.03.028 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Estimating fetal age: effect of head shape on BPD
Hadlock, F., Deter, R., Carpenter, R., & Park, S. (1981) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.137.1.83 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Kehl, S., Schelkle, A., Thomas, A., Puhl, A., Meqdad, K., Tuschy, B., Berlit, S., Weiss, C., Bayer, C., Heimrich, J., et al. (2016) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.14924 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Systematic review of methodology used in ultrasound studies aimed at creating charts of fetal size
Ioannou, C., Talbot, K., Ohuma, E. O., Sarris, I., Villar, J., Conde‐Agudelo, A., & Papageorghiou, A. T. (2012) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03451.x · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Salomon, L. J., Bernard, J. P., Duyme, M., Doris, B., Mas, N., & Ville, Y. G. (2005) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.2665 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Self-citationIncidence of and risk indicators for vasa praevia: a systematic review
Ruiter, L., Kok, N., Limpens, J., Derks, J., de Graaf, I., Mol, B., & Pajkrt, E. (2016) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.13829 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Prognostic implications of fetal echogenic bowel
Slotnick, R. N., & Abuhamad, A. (1996) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(96)90210-x · Cited by 133 · see citing works
(2019) · Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine · doi:10.1002/jum.15163 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Pilu, G., & Segata, M. (2006) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.3877 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
First‐trimester ultrasound determination of chorionicity in twin pregnancy
Dias, T., Arcangeli, T., Bhide, A., Napolitano, R., Mahsud‐Dornan, S., & Thilaganathan, B. (2011) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.8956 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Charts of fetal size: limb bones
Chitty, L. S., & Altman, D. G. (2002) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01022.x · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of fetal craniosynostosis
Delahaye, S., Bernard, J. P., Rénier, D., & Ville, Y. G. (2003) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.91 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Manning, F. A. (1999) · Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s0889-8545(05)70099-1 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Mongelli, M. (1998) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00349-4 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Fetal Skeletal Dysplasia: An Approach to Diagnosis with Illustrative Cases
Dighe, M., Fligner, C. L., Cheng, E., Warren, B. H., & Dubinsky, T. J. (2008) · Radiographics · doi:10.1148/rg.284075122 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
The impact of choice of reference charts and equations on the assessment of fetal biometry
Salomon, L. J., Bernard, J. P., Duyme, M., Buvat, I., & Ville, Y. G. (2005) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.1901 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Self-citationRotten, D., & Levaillant, J. M. (2004) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.984 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Chaoui, R., Heling, K. ‐., Sarut Lopez, A., Thiel, G., & Karl, K. (2011) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.8952 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Clinical guidelines for prevention and management of preterm birth: a systematic review
Medley, N., Poljak, B., Mammarella, S., & Alfirevic, Z. (2018) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.15173 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
RETIRED: Diagnosis and Management of Placenta Previa
Oppenheimer, L. W., Armson, A. B., Farine, D., Keenan-Lindsay, L., Morin, V., Pressey, T., Delisle, M., Gagnon, R. J., Mundle, W. R., & Aerde, J. V. (2007) · Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada · doi:10.1016/s1701-2163(16)32401-x · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Guideline No. 402: Diagnosis and Management of Placenta Previa
Jain, V., Bos, H., & Bujold, E. (2020) · Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada · doi:10.1016/j.jogc.2019.07.019 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Werner, E. F., Hamel, M. S., Orzechowski, K. M., Berghella, V., & Thung, S. (2015) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2015.06.020 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Self-citationBuilding consensus and standards in fetal growth restriction studies
Gordijn, S. J., Beune, I. M., & Ganzevoort, W. (2018) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.02.002 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Vasa Praevia: Diagnosis and Management: Green‐top Guideline No. 27b
Jauniaux, E., Alfirevic, Z., Bhide, A., Burton, G., Collins, S., Silver, R., & the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (2019) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.15307 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Sarris, I., Ioannou, C., Dighe, M., Mitidieri, A. M. D. S., Oberto, M., Qingqing, W., Shah, J., Sohoni, S., Zidjali, W. A., Hoch, L., et al. (2011) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.8997 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Sarris, I., Ioannou, C., Ohuma, E. O., Altman, D. G., Hoch, L., Cosgrove, C., Fathima, S., Salomon, L. J., & Papageorghiou, A. T. (2013) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.12315 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Self-citationBritish Medical Ultrasound Society
Hall, A. J. (1984) · Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1016/0301-5629(84)90208-4 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
(2013) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.13208 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Zhang, W., Geris, S., Al‐Emara, N., Ramadan, G., Sotiriadis, A., & Akolekar, R. (2021) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.22166 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Self-citationVoskamp, B. J., Fleurke‐Rozema, H., Oude‐Rengerink, K., Snijders, R. J. M., Bilardo, C. M., Mol, B. W. J., & Pajkrt, E. (2013) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.12541 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Self-citationKhalifeh, A., & Berghella, V. (2015) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2015.12.017 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Self-citationBravo, C., Gámez, F., Pérez, R., Álvarez, T., & De León-Luis, J. (2016) · Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine · doi:10.7863/ultra.15.02063 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Normal fetal heart axis and position.
Ch, C. (1987) · PubMed · Cited by 66 · see citing works
The Evidence for Abandoning the Amniotic Fluid Index in Favor of the Single Deepest Pocket
Magann, E., Chauhan, S., Doherty, D., Magann, M., & Morrison, J. (2007) · American Journal of Perinatology · doi:10.1055/s-2007-986689 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Sonographic prenatal diagnosis of central nervous system abnormalities
Aubry, M. C., Aubry, J. P., & Dommergues, M. (2003) · Child's Nervous System · doi:10.1007/s00381-003-0768-3 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Quality control of ultrasound for fetal biometry: results from the INTERGROWTH‐21st Project
Cavallaro, A., Ash, S., Napolitano, R., Wanyonyi, S., Ohuma, E. O., Molloholli, M., Sande, J., Sarris, I., Ioannou, C., Norris, T., et al. (2017) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.18811 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Self-citationHughes, D. S., Magann, E. F., Whittington, J. R., Wendel, M. P., Sandlin, A. T., & Ounpraseuth, S. T. (2020) · Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine · doi:10.1002/jum.15116 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Noble, V. E., & Nelson, B. P. (2011) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511734281.002 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Napolitano, R., Donadono, V., Ohuma, E. O., Knight, C. L., Wanyonyi, S. Z., Kemp, B., Norris, T., & Papageorghiou, A. T. (2016) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.15956 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
DiBiase, A. T., Biase, D. D. D., Hay, N., & Sommerlad, B. C. (2002) · The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal · doi:10.1597/1545-1569(2002)039 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Thymic–thoracic ratio in fetuses with trisomy 21, 18 or 13
Karl, K., Heling, K. ‐., Sarut Lopez, A., Thiel, G., & Chaoui, R. (2012) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.11068 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Ranzini, A. C., & Oyelese, Y. (2020) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.23520 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Pathophysiological significance of abnormal umbilical cord coiling index
Sebire, N. J. (2007) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.5180 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Three‐dimensional ultrasound imaging of the fetal skull and face
Tutschek, B., Blaas, H. ‐. K., Abramowicz, J. S., Baba, K., Deng, J., Lee, W., Merz, E., Platt, L. D., Pretorius, D. H., Timor‐Tritsch, I. E., et al. (2017) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.17436 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Self-citationUltrasound screening of umbilical cord abnormalities and delivery management
Hasegawa, J. (2018) · Placenta · doi:10.1016/j.placenta.2017.12.003 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Buchanan-Hughes, A., Bobrowska, A., Visintin, C., Attilakos, G., & Marshall, J. (2020) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-020-01355-0 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Delacourt, C., Bertille, N., Salomon, L. J., Benachi, A., Henry, E., Massardier, J., Mottet, N., Rosenblatt, J., Sartor, A., Thong‐Vanh, C., et al. (2019) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.20130 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationStirnemann, J. J., Fries, N., Bessis, R., Fontanges, M., Mangione, R., & Salomon, L. J. (2017) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.17223 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Self-citationKim, H. J., Kim, J.-H., Chay, D. B., Park, J. H., & Kim, M.-A. (2017) · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science · doi:10.5468/ogs.2017.60.3.266 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Diagnosis and Management of Placenta Previa
Reed, B. D., Cypher, R. L., & Shields, A. D. (2008) · Postgraduate Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/01.pgo.0000335559.70183.5b · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Everwijn, S. M. P., van Nisselrooij, A. E. L., Rozendaal, L., Clur, S. B., Pajkrt, E., Hruda, J., Linskens, I. H., van Lith, J. M., Blom, N. A., & Haak, M. C. (2018) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.5347 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Jansen, C. H. J. R., Kleinrouweler, C. E., Kastelein, A. W., Ruiter, L., van Leeuwen, E., Mol, B. W., & Pajkrt, E. (2020) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.21903 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Økland, I., Bjåstad, T. G., Johansen, T. F., Gjessing, H. K., Grøttum, P., & Eik‐Nes, S. H. (2011) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.8954 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Sonographic development of the normal foetal thorax and abdomen across gestation
Blaas, H. K., & Eik‐Nes, S. H. (2008) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.1963 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Papastefanou, I., Nowacka, U., Syngelaki, A., Dragoi, V., Karamanis, G., Wright, D., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2021) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.23593 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Ritchie, K., Bradbury, I., Slattery, J., Wright, D., Iqbal, K., & Penney, G. (2005) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00560.x · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Multiple congenital contractures (Congenital multiple arthrogryposis)
Bonilla-Musoles, F., Machado, L. E., & Osborne, N. G. (2002) · Journal of Perinatal Medicine · doi:10.1515/jpm.2002.012 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Fuchs, F., Grosjean, F., Captier, G., & Faure, J. (2017) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.5189 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Gandhi, M., Rac, M. W. F., & McKinney, J. (2019) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2019.09.020 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Prenatal sonographic diagnosis of congenital hiatal hernia
Ruano, R., Benachi, A., Aubry, M., Bernard, J., Hameury, F., Nihoul‐Fekete, C., & Dumez, Y. (2004) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.772 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Shetty, P., Menezes, L. T., Tauro, L. F., & Diddigi, K. A. (2013) · Indian Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/s12262-012-0468-x · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Padula, F., Laganà, A. S., Vitale, S. G., Mangiafico, L., D’Emidio, L., Cignini, P., Giorlandino, M., Gulino, F. A., Capriglione, S., & Giorlandino, C. (2016) · PubMed Central · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Tolsgaard, M. G., & Chalouhi, G. E. (2018) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.19071 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Self-citationFinal outcome of a second trimester low-positioned placenta: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Jansen, C. H. J. R., Kleinrouweler, C. E., van Leeuwen, L., Ruiter, L., Limpens, J., van Wely, M., Mol, B. W., & Pajkrt, E. (2019) · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.06.020 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Sonographic definition of the fetal situs
Bronshtein, M. (2002) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02017-3 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Fontanella, F., Groen, H., Duin, L. K., Suresh, S., & Bilardo, C. M. (2021) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.23647 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citationCerclage decreases preterm birth: finally the level I evidence is here
Berghella, V. (2011) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2011.02.079 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Self-citationFrequency and Importance of Incomplete Screening Fetal Anatomic Sonography in Pregnancy
Silvestri, M. T., Pettker, C. M., Raney, J. H., Xu, X., & Ross, J. S. (2016) · Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine · doi:10.7863/ultra.16.01084 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Wikström, T., Kuusela, P., Jacobsson, B., Hagberg, H., Lindgren, P., Svensson, M., Wennerholm, U. ‐., & Valentin, L. (2022) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.24884 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Incidence of Fetal Anomalies After Incomplete Anatomic Surveys Between 16 and 22 Weeks
Waller, S. A., O’Connell, K., Carter, A., Gravett, M. G., Dighe, M., Richardson, M. L., & Dubinsky, T. J. (2013) · Ultrasound Quarterly · doi:10.1097/ruq.0b013e31829a6ad3 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Single Umbilical Artery: Does Side Matter?
Santillan, M., Santillan, D., Fleener, D., Stegmann, B., Zamba, G., Hunter, S., & Yankowitz, J. (2012) · Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy · doi:10.1159/000338133 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Bone dysplasias: an introduction.
Azouz, E. M., Teebi, A. S., Eydoux, P., Chen, M. F., & Fassier, F. R. (1998) · PubMed · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Approach to the diagnosis of skeletal dysplasias: Experience at a center with limited resources
Kumar, M., Thakur, S., Haldar, A., & Anand, R. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Ultrasound · doi:10.1002/jcu.22371 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
The prenatal ultrasonographic diagnosis of osteogenesis imperfecta lethalis.
Bs, B. (1984) · PubMed · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Pleș, L., Sima, R. M., Moisei, C., Moga, M. A., & Dracea, L. (2017) · Medical Ultrasonography · doi:10.11152/mu-844 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
A new two‐dimensional sonographic approach to the assessment of the fetal hard and soft palates
Frisová, V., Cojocaru, L., & Turan, S. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Ultrasound · doi:10.1002/jcu.22928 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
The role of prenatal ultrasound assessment in management of fetal cervicofacial tumors
Zieliński, R., & Respondek‐Liberska, M. (2016) · Archives of Medical Science · doi:10.5114/aoms.2016.60972 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Peixoto, A. B., Caldas, T. M. R. D. C., Giannecchini, C. V., Rôlo, L. C., Martins, W. P., & Júnior, E. A. (2016) · Journal of Perinatal Medicine · doi:10.1515/jpm-2015-0265 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
The Fetal 3‐Vessel Views: An Illustrative Case‐Based Tutorial
Anton, T., Sklansky, M. S., Perez, M., & Pretorius, D. H. (2019) · Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine · doi:10.1002/jum.15067 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
ISUOG statement on the non‐diagnostic use of ultrasound in pregnancy
Salvesen, K. Å., Abramowicz, J. S., ter Haar, G., Miloro, P., Sinkovskaya, E. S., Dall’Asta, A., Maršál, K., Lees, C. C., & Board of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) (2021) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.23611 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
3 of the 115 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 10.1597/1545-1569_2002_039_0073_udoc_2.0.co_2 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): fetal cardiac screening
Carvalho, J. S., Axt-Fliedner, R., Chaoui, R., Copel, J. A., Cuneo, B. F., Goff, D., Kopylov, L. G., Hecher, K., Lee, W., Moon‐Grady, A. J., et al. (2023) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.26224 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
Self-citationA review on deep-learning algorithms for fetal ultrasound-image analysis
Fiorentino, M. C., Villani, F. P., Cosmo, M. D., Frontoni, E., & Moccia, S. (2022) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2022.102629 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
ISUOG Practice Guidelines: role of ultrasound in the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth
Coutinho, C. M., Sotiriadis, A., Odibo, A. O., Khalil, A. A., D'Antonio, F., Feltovich, H. M., Salomon, L. J., Sheehan, P. M., Napolitano, R., Berghella, V., et al. (2022) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.26020 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Self-citationISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): performance of fetal magnetic resonance imaging
Prayer, D., Malinger, G., Catte, L. D., Keersmaecker, B. D., Gonçalves, L. F., Kasprian, G. J., Laifer‐Narin, S., Lee, W., Millischer, A., Platt, L. D., et al. (2023) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.26129 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Self-citationISUOG Practice Guidelines: performance of third‐trimester obstetric ultrasound scan
Khalil, A. A., Sotiriadis, A., D’Antonio, F., Costa, F. D. S., Odibo, A. O., Prefumo, F., Papageorghiou, A. T., & Salomon, L. J. (2024) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.27538 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Self-citationUse of artificial intelligence and deep learning in fetal ultrasound imaging
Ramirez Zegarra, R., & Ghi, T. (2023) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.26130 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy
Khalil, A. A., Sotiriadis, A., Baschat, A., Bhide, A., Gratacós, E., Hecher, K., Lewi, L., Salomon, L. J., Thilaganathan, B., & Ville, Y. G. (2025) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.29166 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Self-citationGestationsdiabetes (GDM) (Update 2023)
Kautzky‐Willer, A., Winhofer, Y., Kiss, H., Falcone, V., Berger, A., Lechleitner, M., Weitgasser, R., & Harreiter, J. (2023) · Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · doi:10.1007/s00508-023-02181-9 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Standard fetal ultrasound plane classification based on stacked ensemble of deep learning models
Krishna, T. B., & Kokil, P. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122153 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
How to do a fetal cardiac scan
Quaresima, P., Fesslová, V., Farina, A., Kagan, K. O., Candiani, M., Morelli, M., Crispi, F., & Cavoretto, P. I. (2023) · Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics · doi:10.1007/s00404-023-06951-8 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Krishna, T. B., & Kokil, P. (2023) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2023.105283 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Drukker, L., Sharma, H., Karim, J. N., Droste, R., Noble, J. A., & Papageorghiou, A. T. (2022) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.24975 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Bottelli, L., Franzè, V., Tuo, G., Buffelli, F., & Paladini, D. (2022) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.26094 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citationFetal anomaly diagnosis and termination of pregnancy
Graf, W. D., Cohen, B. H., Kalsner, L., Pearl, P. L., Sarnat, H. B., & Epstein, L. G. (2023) · Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology · doi:10.1111/dmcn.15528 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Tonni, G., Peixoto, A. B., Werner, H., Grisolia, G., Ruano, R., Sepúlveda, F., Sepúlveda, W., & Júnior, E. A. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Ultrasound · doi:10.1002/jcu.23403 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Krishna, T. B., & Kokil, P. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2024.3369155 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Guideline No. 456: Prenatal Screening for Fetal Chromosomal Anomalies
Audibert, F., Wou, K., Okun, N. B., Bie, I. D., & Wilson, R. D. (2024) · Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada · doi:10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102694 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Zhen, C., Wang, H., Cheng, J., Yang, X., Chen, C., Hu, X., Zhang, Y., Cao, Y. W., Ni, D., Huang, W., et al. (2023) · Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2023.05.005 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Assessing maternal cardiac function by obstetricians: technique and reference ranges
DeVore, G. R., & Polanco, B. (2023) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2023.01.003 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Mascherpa, M., Pegoire, C., Meroni, A., Minopoli, M., Thilaganathan, B., Frick, A., & Bhide, A. (2023) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.27568 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Introduction of a nationwide first-trimester anomaly scan in the Dutch national screening program
Lust, E. E. R., Bronsgeest, K., Henneman, L., Crombag, N. M. T. H., Bilardo, C. M., Galjaard, R. H., Sikkel, E., van der Hout, S., Coumans, A. B. C., Elvan‐Taşpınar, A., et al. (2024) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2024.07.026 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationMonod, C., Kotzaeridi, G., Linder, T., Yerlikaya‐Schatten, G., Wegener, S., Mosimann, B., Henrich, W., Tura, A., & Göbl, C. S. (2023) · Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/aogs.14688 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Lei, T., Zheng, Q., Feng, J., Zhang, L., Zhou, Q., He, M., Lin, M.-H., & Xie, H. (2024) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.29101 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Ultrasound imaging based recognition of prenatal anomalies: a systematic clinical engineering review
Sriraam, N., Chinta, B., Suresh, S., & Sudharshan, S. (2024) · Progress in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1088/2516-1091/ad3a4b · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Pietrolucci, M. E., Maqina, P., Mappa, I., Marra, M. C., Antonio, F. D., & Rizzo, G. (2023) · Journal of Perinatal Medicine · doi:10.1515/jpm-2023-0052 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Antenatal screening for fetal structural anomalies – Routine or targeted practice?
Yahya, R. H., Roman, A., Grant, S., & Whitehead, C. L. (2024) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2024.102521 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Automated Detection of Common Maternal Fetal Ultrasound Planes Using Deep Feature Fusion
Krishna, T. B., & Kokil, P. (2022) · IEEE India Conference · doi:10.1109/indicon56171.2022.10039879 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Königbauer, J. T., Fangmann, L., Reinhardt, C., Weichert, A., Henrich, W., Saskia, B., & Gabriel, H. (2023) · Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics · doi:10.1007/s00404-023-07165-8 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Coronado-Gutiérrez, D., Eixarch, E., Monterde, E., Matas, I., Traversi, P., Gratacós, E., Bonet-Carné, E., & Burgos-Artizzu, X. P. (2023) · Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy · doi:10.1159/000533203 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Whole examination AI estimation of fetal biometrics from 20-week ultrasound scans
Venturini, L., Budd, S., Farruggia, A., Wright, R., Matthew, J., Day, T. G., Kainz, B., Razavi, R., & Hajnal, J. V. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-024-01406-z · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Robertis, V. D., Stampalija, T., Abuhamad, A., Bosco, M., Chaoui, R., Formigoni, C., Moon‐Grady, A. J., Paladini, D., Pilu, G., Ramezzana, I. G., et al. (2025) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.29224 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationFetal imaging, phenotyping, and genomic testing in modern prenatal diagnosis
Shear, M. A., Robinson, P. N., & Sparks, T. N. (2024) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2024.102575 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Ebbing, C., Rasmussen, S., Kessler, J., & Moster, D. (2022) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.26047 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Prenatal diagnosis of cleft lip and/or palate: What do we tell prospective parents?
Wilkes, C., Graetz, M., Downie, L., Bethune, M., & Chong, D. K. (2023) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.6418 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Considering the Effects and Maternofoetal Implications of Vascular Disorders and the Umbilical Cord
Sánchez‐Trujillo, L., Montero, C. G., Fraile‐Μartinez, O., Guijarro, L. G., Bravo, C., León-Luis, J. A. D., Saez, J. V., Buján, J., Álvarez‐Mon, M., García‐Honduvilla, N., et al. (2022) · Medicina · doi:10.3390/medicina58121754 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Cleft Lip and Palate Antenatal Diagnosis: A Swiss University Center Performance Analysis
Guichoud, Y., Ezzi, O. E., & Roessingh, A. D. B. (2023) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics13152479 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Benson, M., Walton, S., Hartley, T., Meagher, S. E., Seshadri, S., Sleep, N., & Papageorghiou, A. T. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-02024-z · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Fetal cardiac screening: 1st trimester and beyond
Freud, L. R., & Simpson, L. L. (2024) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.6571 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Tu, P., Zhang, X., Zhong, C., Ran, Q., & Ran, S. (2024) · Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases · doi:10.1186/s13023-024-03107-y · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Krishna, T. B., & Kokil, P. (2024) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2024.3485216 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Referral scan for congenital anomalies: time to agree on indications
Robertis, V. D., Calì, G., Corbella, P., Formigoni, C., Iuculano, A., Nonino, F., Pasquini, L., Prefumo, F., Sciarrone, A., Stampalija, T., et al. (2022) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.24950 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citationCongenital hypotonia: systematic approach for prenatal detection
Weissbach, T., Hausman‐Kedem, M., Yanay, Z., Meyer, R., Bar‐Yosef, O., Leibovitch, L., Berkenstadt, M., Chorin, O., Shani, H., Massarwa, A., et al. (2023) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.26178 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Prenatal diagnosis and postnatal outcome of closed spinal dysraphism
Bedei, I. A., Krispin, E., Cortés, M. S., Lombaard, H. A., Zemet, R., Whitehead, W. E., Belfort, M. A., & Huisman, T. A. G. M. (2023) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.6454 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
The clinical impact of the first‐trimester nuchal translucency between the 95th–99th percentiles
Fantasia, I., Catagini, S., Zamagni, G., Greco, P., Bianchini, I., Bussolaro, S., Quadrifoglio, M., Bello, L. L., Monasta, L., Ricci, G., et al. (2023) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.6390 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Han, X., Yu, J., Yang, X., Chen, C., Zhou, H., Qiu, C., Cao, Y., Zhang, T., Peng, M., Zhu, G., et al. (2024) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-024-06336-y · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Current practice of placental cord insertion documentation in Australia – A sonographer survey
Ward, S., Sun, Z., & Maresse, S. (2023) · Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine · doi:10.1002/ajum.12360 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Ługowski, F., Babińska, J., & Stanirowski, P. J. (2026) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2025.1737391 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Fetal Hands: A Comprehensive Review of Prenatal Assessment and Diagnosis Over the Past 40 Years
Tonni, G., Grisolia, G., Bonasoni, M. P., Rizzo, G., Werner, H., Sepúlveda, W., Ruano, R., & Júnior, E. A. (2022) · Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2022.09.022 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Rodríguez, M., Echevarrı́a, M., Perdomo, L., Gómez‐Chiari, M., García, S., Prats, P., Serra, B., & Albaigés, G. (2024) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.6510 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Obliterated cavum septi pellucidi: Clinical significance and role of fetal magnetic resonance
Fantasia, I., Ciardo, C., Bracalente, G., Filippi, E., Murru, F. M., Spezzacatene, A., Bin, M., Quintero, O. M., Montaguti, E., Lees, C. C., et al. (2023) · Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/aogs.14575 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citationLei, T., Feng, J. L., Lin, M. F., Xie, B. H., Zhou, Q., Wang, N., Zheng, Q., Yang, Y. D., Guo, H., & Xie, H. (2023) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1002/ijgo.15167 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Advances in Fetal Cardiac Imaging and Intervention
Barber, N. J., & Freud, L. R. (2023) · CJC Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease · doi:10.1016/j.cjcpc.2023.10.012 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
The fetal anomaly screening scan: an international perspective
Suwaidi, H. H. A., Abdelhalem, R. M. A., & Agten, A. K. (2024) · Obstetrics Gynaecology & Reproductive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ogrm.2024.05.002 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Fortin, O., Mulkey, S. B., & Fraser, J. L. (2024) · Pediatric Research · doi:10.1038/s41390-024-03343-9 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Sivasubramanian, A., Sasidharan, D., Sowmya, V., & Ravi, V. (2025) · Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine · doi:10.1007/s13246-025-01566-6 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Cost-effectiveness analysis of AI-based image quality control for perinatal ultrasound screening
Tan, Y., Peng, Y., Guo, L., Liu, D. T. Y., & Luo, Y. (2024) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-024-06477-w · Cited by 10 · see citing works
He, G., Li, Z., Zhu, Z., Han, T., Cao, Y., Chen, C., Huang, Y., Dou, H., Liang, L., Zhang, F., et al. (2025) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-024-07108-4 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Cao, X., Li, B., Zhou, Y., Cao, Y. W., Yang, X. Y., Hu, X., Chen, K., Zhu, S., Lin, H.-L., Wang, T., et al. (2025) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-025-07485-4 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Corroënne, R., Paladini, D., Papastefanou, I., Chaoui, R., Pomar, L., Guibaud, L., Haratz, K. K., Pooh, R. K., Herrera, M., Ximenes, R. L. D. S., et al. (2025) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.70003 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citationShort‐term outcome after the prenatal diagnosis of right aortic arch
Bet, B., Snoep, M. C., van Leeuwen, E., Linskens, I. H., Haak, M. C., Rozendaal, L., Knobbe, I., van Schuppen, J., Hoekstra, C. E. L., Koolbergen, D. R., et al. (2023) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.6326 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Siargkas, A., Giouleka, S., Tsakiridis, I. G., Mamopoulos, A. M., Kalogiannidis, I. A., Athanasiadis, A. P., & Dagklis, T. (2023) · Medicina · doi:10.3390/medicina59061080 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Fetal Cerebellar Area: Ultrasound Reference Ranges at 13–39 Weeks of Gestation
Manzo, L., Orlandi, G., Gabrielli, O., Toscano, P., Lella, E. D., Lettieri, A., Mazzarelli, L. L., Sica, G., Meglio, L. D., Meglio, L. D., et al. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm12124080 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Monier, I., Lelong, N., Benachi, A., Jouannic, J., Khoshnood, B., & Zeitlin, J. A. (2023) · American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM · doi:10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101170 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Belciug, S. (2024) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-024-02505-3 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Italian Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (SIEOG) Working Group on the Obstetric Referral Scan (2023) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.26271 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Sleep quality during pregnancy and fetal growth: A prospective cohort study
Wu, F., Sun, L., Chen, J., Du, Y., Fan, Z., Cao, Z., Liu, H., Lei, X., & Zhang, F. (2024) · Journal of Sleep Research · doi:10.1111/jsr.14233 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Pavanya, M., Chadaga, K., Jaganathan, V., Vasudeva, A., Rao, B. K., Prabhu, S., & Bhat, S. K. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-11837-7 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
ISUOG Practice Guidelines: point‐of‐care ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology
Robertis, V. D., Bilardo, C. M., Abu-Rustum, R., Poon, L. C., Kamel, R., Rocha, R. M., Syngelaki, A., Stampalija, T., & Collaborators (2025) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.70122 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationBelciug, S., Ivănescu, R. C., Şerbănescu, M.-S., Ispas, F., Nagy, R. D., Comănescu, C. M., Istrate-Ofiţeru, A. M., & Iliescu, D. G. (2024) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077366 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Lamon, S., de Dumast, P., Sanchez, T., Dunet, V., Pomar, L., Vial, Y., Koob, M., & Cuadra, M. B. (2024) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2024.1358741 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Lauer, G., Pradel, W., & Birdir, C. (2023) · HNO · doi:10.1007/s00106-023-01291-0 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Garel, J., Rossi, A., Blondiaux, É., Cassart, M., Hoffmann, C., & Garel, C. (2023) · Pediatric Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00247-023-05766-8 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Fetal eye ultrasound: Normal anatomy, abnormal findings, and clinical impact
Kagan, K. O., Tost, F., Heling, K., Hoopmann, M., Sonek, J., & Chaoui, R. (2024) · Ultraschall in der Medizin - European Journal of Ultrasound · doi:10.1055/a-2318-5464 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Ward, S., Sun, Z., & Maresse, S. (2024) · Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine · doi:10.1002/ajum.12399 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Spectrum of congenital anomalies detected through anatomy ultrasound at a referral hospital in Ghana
Swarray‐Deen, A., Yapundich, M., Boudová, S., Doffour-Dapaah, K., Osei-Agyapong, J., Sepenu, P., Boateng, A. K., Mensah, T. A., Anum, P., Oduro, N. E., et al. (2025) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-025-07640-x · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Mishra, D., Saha, P., Zhao, H., Hernandez-Cruz, N., Patey, O. V., Papageorghiou, A. T., & Noble, J. A. (2025) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2025.103611 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Nagasaki, S., Ishii, K., Murakami, Y., Tsutsui, A., Hidaka, N., Takahashi, H., Ichizuka, K., Miyakoshi, K., Miura, K., Miyashita, S., et al. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-14508-9 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Yu, J., Wu, Q., Kong, F., & Ning, Y. (2024) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-024-06375-5 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Jia, S., Xie, W., Yang, C., Dong, Y., Luo, W., Gu, H., Wei, X., Ma, W., Liu, D., Cao, S., et al. (2025) · JCI Insight · doi:10.1172/jci.insight.186629 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Lee, S. U., Jung, G., Kim, H. W., & Ko, H. S. (2023) · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science · doi:10.5468/ogs.23022 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Wang, Y., Lv, Y., Yao, J., Ding, H., Li, G., Li, J., & Chen, L. (2024) · Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/aogs.15025 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Brock, C. O., Baschat, A., Moldenhauer, J. S., Ryan, G., & Johnson, A. (2025) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2025.07.001 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
IUGC: A benchmark of landmark detection in end-to-end intrapartum ultrasound biometry
Bai, J., Tang, Y., Liu, X., Hu, J., Li, Y. D., Chen, X., Wang, Y. T., Ma, C., Li, Y., Guo, B., et al. (2026) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2026.103960 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Goergen, S., Furruqh, F., Evans, R., Cicilet, S., & Mankad, K. (2023) · British Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1259/bjr.20221042 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Prenatal diagnosis of bilobate placenta: incidence, risk factors and impact on pregnancy outcomes
Giouleka, S., Siargkas, A., Tsakiridis, I. G., Mamopoulos, A. M., Athanasiadis, A. P., & Dagklis, T. (2023) · Journal of Perinatal Medicine · doi:10.1515/jpm-2023-0122 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Small size, big problems: insights and difficulties in prenatal diagnosis of fetal microcephaly
Haddad, L., Hadi, E., Leibovitz, Z., Lev, D., Shalev, Y., Gindes, L., & Lerman‐Sagie, T. (2024) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2024.1347506 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Can, S. T., Gölbaşı, H., Bayraktar, B., Sağlam, C., Ömeroğlu, İ., Torun, R., Gercik, I., Aktaş, H. A., & Ekin, A. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Ultrasound · doi:10.1002/jcu.23839 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Counselling in Fetal Medicine: Complications of Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin Pregnancies
Sorrenti, S., Khalil, A. A., D’Antonio, F., D’Ambrosio, V., Zullo, F., D’Alberti, E., Derme, M., Mappa, I., Mascio, D. D., Rizzo, G., et al. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm13237295 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Automated craniofacial biometry with 3D T2w fetal MRI
Matthew, J., Uus, A. U., Egloff, A. M., Luis, A., Arulkumaran, S., Fukami-Gartner, A., Kyriakopoulou, V., Cromb, D., Wright, R., Colford, K., et al. (2024) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000663 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Feasibility of a Standardised Mid‐Trimester Ultrasound Protocol: A National Multicenter Study
Bultez, T., Salomon, L. J., Mahallati, H., Fries, N., & the CNEOFT2 Study Group (2025) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.18102 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationPrenatal diagnosis and pregnancy outcomes in fetuses with vertebral abnormalities
Hu, J. S., Zeng, L., Wang, T., Yi, M., & Song, J. (2025) · The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine · doi:10.1080/14767058.2025.2468000 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Doğru, Ş., & Akkuş, F. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Ultrasound · doi:10.1002/jcu.23476 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Shi, Z., Wen, H., Leng, J., Wang, J., Wang, Y., Luo, D., Chen, Z., Qin, Y., Liang, M., Tan, Y., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Pediatrics · doi:10.3389/fped.2023.1199965 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Pei, S., Guan, H.-L., & Jin, F. (2023) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000036623 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Tersigni, C., Simone, N. D., Lucchetti, D., Colella, F., Onori, M., Perossini, S., Vidiri, A., Franco, R., Sgambato, A., Vatish, M., et al. (2024) · Reproductive Sciences · doi:10.1007/s43032-024-01491-1 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Absent or hypoplastic nasal bone: What to tell the prospective parents?
., S. D., Sharma, C., Yadav, T., Dubey, K., Shekhar, S., Singh, P., Singh, K., Gothwal, M., Jhirwal, M., & Shekhawat, D. S. (2024) · Birth Defects Research · doi:10.1002/bdr2.2348 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Andrietti, S., D’Agostino, S., Panarelli, M., Sarno, L., Pisaturo, M. L., & Fantasia, I. (2024) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics14222543 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Association of uterine fibroids with late miscarriage: multicenter cohort study
Siargkas, A., Mira, M. D. M. G., Chaveeva, P., Matallana, C. D. P., Oglou, M. I., Muñoz-Contreras, M., Kalev, V., Gonzalez-Gea, L., Fernández‐Buhigas, I., Sánchez‐Romero, J., et al. (2025) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.29169 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
AI to Assist in the Fetal Anomaly Ultrasound Scan: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Day, T. G., Matthew, J., Budd, S., Farruggia, A., Venturini, L., Wright, R., Jamshidi, B., To, M. S., Ling, H., Lai, J., et al. (2025) · NEJM AI · doi:10.1056/aioa2400747 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Du, Y., Ji, C., Xu, J., Wei, M., Ren, Y., Xia, S., & Zhou, J. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-99268-2 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Salomon, L. J., Alfirevic, Z., Berghella, V., Bilardo, C. M., Chalouhi, G. E., Da Silva Costa, F., Hernandez‐Andrade, E., Malinger, G., Munoz, H., Paladini, D., Prefumo, F., Sotiriadis, A., Toi, A., & Lee, W.
- Affiliations
- Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades (FR)
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool Liverpool UK
- Thomas Jefferson University (US)
- University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
- Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit, Gold Coast University Hospital and School of Medicine, Griffith University, Gold Coast Queensland Australia
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- University of Chile Hospital, Fetal Medicine Unit, Obstetrics & Gynecology Santiago Chile
- Istituto Giannina Gaslini (IT)
- University of Brescia (IT)
- Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
- Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
- Baylor College of Medicine (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-05-20
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 840-856
- ISSN
- 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-0705
- OpenAlex
- W4280616996
- Semantic Scholar
- 3c0a6efe5b25ce7ec618babcfe77b2b4dea02d19
- Cited by
- 436
- References
- 115
- Citations by year
- 2026: 113 · 2025: 131 · 2024: 106 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 14 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 88.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- erratum (2022-10-02)
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Brescia) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Keywords
- second-trimester ultrasound, prenatal ultrasound, best practice recommendations
- MeSH terms
- Female, Gestational Age, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, Second, Ultrasonography, Prenatal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review