The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structural accelerated failure time models for survival analysis in studies with time-varying treatments
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the absence of unmeasured confounding factors and model misspecification, standard methods for estimating the causal effect of time-varying treatments on survival are biased when (i) there exists a time-dependent risk factor for survival that also predicts subsequent treatment and (ii) past treatment history predicts subsequent risk factor level. In contrast, structural models provide consistent estimates of causal effects when unmeasured confounding and model misspecification are absent. The parameters of nested structural models are estimated by g-estimation and those of marginal structural models by inverse probability weighting. METHODS: We describe a nested structural accelerated failure time model and use it to estimate the total causal effect of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) on the time to AIDS or death among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected participants of the Multicenter AIDS Cohort and Women's Interagency HIV Studies. The Appendix describes g-estimation and methods to deal with censoring. RESULTS: Comparing the regime 'always treated' to 'never treated,' the AIDS-free survival time ratio was 2.5 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7, 3.3). CONCLUSIONS: Our finding of a strongly beneficial effect is consistent with results from randomized trials and from a previous analysis of the same data using a marginal structural Cox model. In contrast, a previous analysis using a standard (non-structural) model did not find an effect of treatment on survival.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A structural approach to selection bias
Hernán, M. A., Hernández-Díaz, S., & Robins, J. M. (2004) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/01.ede.0000135174.63482.43 · Cited by 2,844
Self-citationRobins, J. (1986) · Mathematical Modelling · doi:10.1016/0270-0255(86)90088-6 · Cited by 2,451
Self-citationRobins, J. M., & Finkelstein, D. M. (2000) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00779.x · Cited by 877
Self-citation
Cited by
Constructing Inverse Probability Weights for Marginal Structural Models
Cole, S. R., & Hernan, M. A. (2008) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwn164 · Cited by 2,796
Self-citationHernán, M. A. (2010) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/ede.0b013e3181c1ea43 · Cited by 1,370
Self-citationHernán, M. A., Alonso, A., Logan, R., Grodstein, F., Michels, K. B., Willett, W. C., Manson, J. E., & Robins, J. M. (2008) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/ede.0b013e3181875e61 · Cited by 818
Self-citationPer-Protocol Analyses of Pragmatic Trials
Hernán, M. A., & Robins, J. M. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsm1605385 · Cited by 660
Self-citationMarginal Structural Models for the Estimation of Direct and Indirect Effects
VanderWeele, T. J. (2009) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/ede.0b013e31818f69ce · Cited by 583
Metadata
- Authors
- Hernán, M. A., Cole, S. R., Margolick, J., Cohen, M., & Robins, J. M.
- Venue
- Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 477-491
- ISSN
- 1053-8569 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1557
- OpenAlex
- W2149848064
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structural accelerated failure time models for survival analysis in studies with time-varying treatments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pds.1064
- The paper
- Hernán, M. A., Cole, S. R., Margolick, J., Cohen, M., & Robins, J. M. (2005). Structural accelerated failure time models for survival analysis in studies with time-varying treatments. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.1064
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.