Cited by 2,451Advanced Causal Inference TechniquesStatistical Methods in EpidemiologyStatistical Methods and Inference

A New Approach To Causal Inference in Mortality Studies With a Sustained Exposure Period - Application To Control of the Healthy Worker Survivor Effect

Open access
Robins, James·1986·Mathematical Modelling

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0270-0255(86)90088-6

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The biostatistics literature has focused on sequential random ignorability assumptions that impose treatment in each period is random conditional on the path of covariates and realized outcomes, rather than parallel trends.

    “the biostatistics literature has focused on sequential random ignorability assumptions that impose that treatment in each period is random conditional on the path of covariates and realized outcomes, rather than parallel trends.”
  • The truncated factorization formula is not restricted to interventions on a single variable; it applies to simultaneous or sequential interventions, such as time-varying treatments with time-varying confounders.

    “Note also that the truncated factorization formula is not restricted to interventions on a single variable; it is applicable to simultaneous or sequential interventions such as those invoked in the analysis of time varying treatment with time varying confounders (Robins, 1986; Arjas and Parner, 2004).”

    From Causal inference in statistics: An overview (2009) · cites this paper as Robins, 1986

  • The truncated factorization formula is not restricted to interventions on a single variable; it is applicable to simultaneous or sequential interventions.

    “Note also that the truncated factorization formula is not restricted to interventions on a single variable; it is applicable to simultaneous or sequential interventions such as those invoked in the analysis of time varying treatment with time varying confounders (Robins, 1986, Arjas andParner, 2004).”

    From An Introduction to Causal Inference (2010) · cites this paper as Robins, 1986

  • The algebraic machinery of counterfactual notation can be powerful in refining assumptions, deriving consistent estimands, bounding probabilities of necessary and sufficient causation, and combining experimental and nonexperimental data.

    “the algebraic machinery offered by the counterfactual notation, Y x (u), once a problem is properly formalized, can be extremely powerful in refining assumptions (Angrist et al., 1996, Heckman andVytlacil, 2005), deriving consistent estimands (Robins, 1986), bounding probabilities of necessary and sufficient causation (Tian and Pearl, 2000), and combining data from experimental and nonexperimental”

    From An Introduction to Causal Inference (2010) · cites this paper as Robins, 1986

  • Hypothetical entities Yx are assumed to be connected to observed variables via consistency constraints such as X=x implies Yx=Y.

    “They are assumed to be connected to observed variables via consistency constraints (Robins, 1986) such as X = x =⇒ Y x = Y,(32)”

    From An Introduction to Causal Inference (2010) · cites this paper as Robins, 1986

    The 'Definition of a treatment' section discusses hypothetical survival histories under treatment, and Section 2C.3 relates planned and observed exposure histories. Neither passage states that a hypothetical outcome equals the observed outcome when the hypothetical treatment matches the treatment received. Searches for consistency and that outcome-equality condition did not find it in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.68)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 20 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [2]2. J. M. Robins, A statistical method to control for the healthy worker effect in intracohott comparisons. Am. J. Epidemiology 120, 465 (1984).
  2. [25]25. J. D. Kalbfleisch and R. L. Prentice, The Srotisrical Analysis ofFailure Time Data. Wiley, New York (1980).
  3. [27]27. Bamdorff-Nielsen, Informurion und Exponential Families in Sta:isricul Theory. Wiley, New York (1978).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Robins, J.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Robins, James
Venue
Mathematical Modelling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1986
Volume
7
Issue
9-12
Pages
1393-1512
ISSN
0270-0255 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082299845
Cited by
2,451
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 148 · 2025: 177 · 2024: 221 · 2023: 167 · 2022: 182 · 2021: 167 · 2020: 170 · 2019: 137 · 2018: 107 · 2017: 104 · 2016: 99 · 2015: 98 · 2014: 100 · 2013: 67 · 2012: 85
FWCI
4.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Mathematical Modelling (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
Keywords
causal inference, mortality studies, healthy worker survivor effect, occupational mortality, arsenic exposure, copper smelter workers, lung cancer mortality, all-cause mortality, causal graphical models, mortality risk factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review