The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Newer antidepressants in pregnancy and rates of major malformations: a meta-analysis of prospective comparative studies
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A substantial number of women of childbearing age suffer from depression. Despite this, relatively little is known about the safety of antidepressant use during pregnancy. PURPOSE: We conducted a meta-analysis of prospective comparative cohort studies to quantify the relationship between maternal exposure to the newer antidepressants and major malformations. METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase and Reprotox from 1996 to the present for studies comparing outcomes in first trimester exposures to citalopram, escitalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, sertraline, reboxetine, venlafaxine, nefazodone, trazodone, mirtazapine and bupropion to those of non-exposed mothers. Data were combined using a random effects model; heterogeneity was tested with chi2, and publication bias with a funnel plot and the Begg-Mazumdar statistic. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies were identified, 15 were rejected (4 reviews, 4 without comparison groups, 2 third trimester exposures, 2 retrospective database studies, 2 case reports and 1 duplicate); 7 studies (n = 1774) met inclusion criteria. Effects were not heterogeneous (chi2 = 2.04, p = 0.92); funnel plot and test (tau = -0.24, p = 0.45) indicated no publication bias. The summary relative risk was 1.01 (95%CI: 0.57-1.80). CONCLUSIONS: As a group, the newer antidepressants are not associated with an increased risk of major malformations above the baseline of 1-3% in the population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prevalence of Depression During Pregnancy: Systematic Review
Bennett, H. A., Einarson, A., Taddio, A., Koren, G., & Einarson, T. R. (2004) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000116689.75396.5f · Cited by 1,725
Self-citationDepressive Symptoms among Pregnant Women Screened in Obstetrics Settings
Marcus, S. M., Flynn, H. A., Blow, F. C., & Barry, K. L. (2003) · Journal of Women's Health · doi:10.1089/154099903765448880 · Cited by 742
Cited by
Garvey, W. T., Mechanick, J. I., Brett, E. M., Garber, A. J., Hurley, D. L., Jastreboff, A. M., Nadolsky, K., Pessah-Pollack, R., & Plodkowski, R. (2016) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.4158/ep161365.gl · Cited by 1,914
Practice Bulletin No. 183: postpartum hemorrhage
(2017) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002351 · Cited by 1,406
Goodwin, G., Haddad, P., Ferrier, I., Aronson, J., Barnes, T., Cipriani, A., Coghill, D., Fazel, S., Geddes, Jr., Grunze, H., et al. (2016) · Journal of Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1177/0269881116636545 · Cited by 1,309
Cohen, L. S. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.295.5.499 · Cited by 1,031
Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients With Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
(2008) · APA Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders: Comprehensive Guidelines and Guideline Watches · doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890423363.149114 · Cited by 1,028
Metadata
- Authors
- Einarson, T. R., & Einarson, A.
- Venue
- Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 823-827
- ISSN
- 1053-8569 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1557
- OpenAlex
- W2004928044
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Newer antidepressants in pregnancy and rates of major malformations: a meta-analysis of prospective comparative studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pds.1084
- The paper
- Einarson, T. R., & Einarson, A. (2005). Newer antidepressants in pregnancy and rates of major malformations: a meta-analysis of prospective comparative studies. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.1084
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.