Cited by 38Smoking Behavior and CessationMedical Coding and Health InformationElectronic Health Records Systems

Validation of The Health Improvement Network (THIN) primary care database for monitoring prescriptions for smoking cessation medications

Langley, Tessa E., Szatkowski, Lisa, Gibson, Jack, Huang, Yue, McNeill, Ann, Coleman, Tim, Lewis, Sarah·2010·Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety

Abstract

Purpose: Evaluation of tobacco policy requires high quality and timely data on smoking cessation behaviour in the general population and in relevant target groups. Electronic primary care databases have the potential to provide a valuable source of data due to their size and continuity, and the availability of demographic and socioeconomic data. We therefore sought to investigate whether The Health Improvement Network (THIN) prescribing data are complete and can therefore be used to monitor trends in the prescribing of smoking cessation medications. Methods: The THIN smoking cessation medication prescriptions data for England were compared with smoking cessation medication dispensing data from NHS Prescription Services for January 2004 to December 2005. Results: Throughout the period the rates of prescribing and dispensing were very similar, both for nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and bupropion combined, and for each type of medication alone. For NRT, dispensing exceeded recorded GP prescribing by 5.5% during the study period. For bupropion, prescribing exceeded dispensing by 5%. Conclusions: THIN prescribing and national dispensing data are highly comparable. THIN prescribing data could potentially be used to monitor longitudinal trends in prescribing for smoking cessation medications. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pds.1960

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Since the turn of the millennium, strategies aimed at reducing the mortality gap between people with SMI and the general population have been implemented in the UK.

    “Since the turn of the millennium, a number of strategies aimed at reducing the mortality gap between people with SMI and the general population have been implemented in the UK.10–17”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Langley, T. E., Szatkowski, L., Gibson, J., Huang, Y., McNeill, A., Coleman, T., & Lewis, S.
Affiliations
University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Langley, Tessa E.
Venue
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-05-04
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
586-590
ISSN
  • 1053-8569 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1557
OpenAlex
W2017917886
Cited by
38
References
15
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Cancer Research UK
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • British Heart Foundation
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/G007489/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
Health Improvement Network, smoking cessation medication, nicotine replacement therapy, bupropion, dispensing data, data validation, prescribing trends
MeSH terms
England, United Kingdom, Humans, Nicotine, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Primary Health Care, Databases, Factual, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Smoking Cessation, Bupropion, Nicotinic Agonists, Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review