The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Validation of the national health insurance research database with ischemic stroke cases in Taiwan
Abstract
Objective: The National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) is commonly used for pharmacoepidemiological research in Taiwan. This study evaluated the validity of the database for patients with a principal diagnosis of ischemic stroke. Study design and methods: This cross‐sectional study compares records in the NHIRD with those in one medical center. Patients hospitalized for ischemic stroke in 1999 were identified from both databases. The discharge notes, laboratory data, and medication orders during admission and the first discharge visit were reviewed to validate ischemic stroke diagnoses and aspirin prescribing in the NHIRD. Agreement between the two databases in comorbidities of ischemic stroke diagnosis was evaluated using ICD‐9 codes. Results: Three hundred and seventy two cases were identified from the NHIRD; among them, 364 cases (97.85%) were confirmed as ischemic stroke by radiology examination and clinical presentation. Among these confirmed cases, 344 (94.51%) were assigned ‘ischemic stroke’ as the principal diagnosis in the NHIRD. The overall agreement of comorbid diagnoses between the databases was 48.39%. The PPV for selected conditions also varied widely, from 0.50 for fracture to 1.00 for colon cancer. The accuracy of recorded aspirin prescriptions was higher in first post‐discharge visits (PPV = 0.94) than during hospitalization (PPV = 0.88). Conclusion: The accuracy of the NHIRD in recording ischemic stroke diagnoses and aspirin prescriptions was high, and the NHIRD appears to be a valid resource for population research in ischemic stroke. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
International Trends in Mortality From Stroke, 1968 to 1994
Sarti, C., Rastenyte, D., Cepaitis, Z., & Tuomilehto, J. (2000) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.31.7.1588 · Cited by 451
Cited by
Validity of diagnostic codes for acute stroke in administrative databases: a systematic review.
McCormick, N., Bhole, V., Lacaille, D., & Avina-Zubieta, J. A. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0135834 · Cited by 414
Jung, C.-R., Lin, Y.-T., & Hwang, B.-F. (2015) · Journal of Alzheimer's Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-140855 · Cited by 380
Chao, T.-F., Liu, C.-J., Wang, K.-L., Lin, Y.-J., Chang, S.-L., Lo, L.-W., Hu, Y.-F., Tuan, T.-C., Chen, T.-J., Lip, G. Y. H., et al. (2015) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.11.046 · Cited by 258
Use of lithium and cancer risk in patients with bipolar disorder: population-based cohort study
Huang, R.-Y., Hsieh, K.-P., Huang, W.-W., & Yang, Y.-H. (2016) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.116.181362 · Cited by 83
Lin, D. S.-H., Lee, J.-K., & Chen, W.-J. (2021) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-021-05497-1 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Cheng, C., Kao, Y. Y., Lin, S., Lee, C., & Lai, M. L.
- Venue
- Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-12-29
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 236-242
- ISSN
- 1053-8569 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1557
- OpenAlex
- W2042265219
- Cited by
- 1,277
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 94.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validation of the national health insurance research database with ischemic stroke cases in Taiwan. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/pds.2087
- The paper
- Cheng, C., Kao, Y. Y., Lin, S., Lee, C., & Lai, M. L. (2011). Validation of the national health insurance research database with ischemic stroke cases in Taiwan. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.2087
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.