Cited by 83Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentSchizophrenia research and treatmentTreatment of Major Depression

Use of lithium and cancer risk in patients with bipolar disorder: population-based cohort study

Open access
Huang, Ru-Yu, Hsieh, Kun-Pin, Huang, Wan-Wen, Yang, Yi-Hsin·2016·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Lithium inhibits glycogen synthase kinase-3, which is an enzyme involved in the pathogenesis of cancer. Aims: To investigate the association between lithium and cancer risk in patients with bipolar disorder. Method: A retrospective cohort study was designed using the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) in Taiwan. Patients using lithium comprised the index drug group and patients using anticonvulsants only comprised the control group. Time-dependent Cox regression was used to evaluate the hazard ratios (HRs) for risk of cancer. Results: Compared with anticonvulsant-only exposure, lithium exposure was associated with significantly lower cancer risk (HR = 0.735, 95% CI 0.554–0.974). The hazard ratios for the first, second and third tertiles of the cumulative defined daily dose were 0.762 (95% CI 0.516–1.125), 0.919 (95% CI 0.640–1.318) and 0.552 (95% CI 0.367–0.831), respectively. Conclusions: Lithium is associated with reduced overall cancer risk in patients with bipolar disorder. A dose–response relationship for cancer risk reduction was observed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.116.181362

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, R.-Y., Hsieh, K.-P., Huang, W.-W., & Yang, Y.-H.
Affiliations
Kaohsiung Medical University (TW)
Corresponding author
Yang, Yi-Hsin
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2016-11
Volume
209
Issue
5
Pages
393-399
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2465989363
Cited by
83
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 3
FWCI
9.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
lithium, bipolar disorder, cancer risk, glycogen synthase kinase-3 inhibition, antiepileptic drugs, dose-response relationship, defined daily doses
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anticonvulsants, Bipolar Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Registries, Retrospective Studies, Risk, Taiwan, Lithium Compounds, Antimanic Agents, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review